COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL EVALUATION IN PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY CANCER AFTER ENDOVIDEOSURGICAL RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY AND RENAL RESECTION
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2013-9-2-21-25
Abstract
The results of surgical treatment were analyzed in 48 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Out of them, 31 patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy (LNE), 17 had laparoscopic renal resection (LRR). The mean follow-up period was 34.4 months with a standard deviation of ± 17 months).
Our presented series of 17 LRR and 31 LNE cases is comparable with the similar series described in the world literature in terms of surgical parameters, safety, and efficiency. The results of surgical treatment are objectively close to those of virtually complete cure. The wide introduction of organ-sparing surgical procedures is urgent for patients with T1a-bN0M0 RCC.
About the Authors
S. V. Popov
Saint Luke’s Clinical Hospital, Saint Petersburg City Center of Endoscopic Urology and New Technologies;
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Department of Hospital Surgery, Medical Faculty
Russian Federation
Department of Hospital Surgery, Medical Faculty
R. G. Guseinov
Saint Luke’s Clinical Hospital, Saint Petersburg City Center of Endoscopic Urology and New Technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. B. Borisenkov
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Department of Hospital Surgery, Medical Faculty
Russian Federation
Department of Hospital Surgery, Medical Faculty
A. I. Novikov
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
O. N. Skryabin
Saint Luke’s Clinical Hospital, Saint Petersburg City Center of Endoscopic Urology and New Technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. N. Orlov
Saint Luke’s Clinical Hospital, Saint Petersburg City Center of Endoscopic Urology and New Technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. V. Zaitsev
Saint Luke’s Clinical Hospital, Saint Petersburg City Center of Endoscopic Urology and New Technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
T. M. Topuzov
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
G. M. Manikhas
City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
P. A. Karlov
City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Лопаткин Н.А. Урология: национальное руководство. Под ред. Н.А. Лопаткина. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2009. 1024 с.
2. Юрин А.Г., Ковальский Г.Б. Опухоли почек. Рабочие стандарты паталогоанатомического исследования. Библиотека патологоанатома. СПб.: ГПАБ. 2006. Вып. 75. 82 с.
3. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2008 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. В.И. Чиссова, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой М.: ФГУ «МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена Росмедтехнологий», 2010. 256 с.
4. Мерабишвили В.М. Ежегодник Популяционного ракового регистра. СПб.: КОСТА, 2008. 100 с.
5. Аполихин О.И., Сивков А.В., Бешлие в Д.А. и др. Анализ уронефрологической заболеваемости в Российской Федерации по данным официальной статистики. Экспер и клин урология. 2010;1:4–11.
6. Аляев Ю.Г., Крапивин А.А. Локализованный и местно-распространенный рак почки: нефрэктомия или резекция? Онкоурология 2005;1:10–5.
7. Huang W.C., Levey A.C., Serio A.M. et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006;(7):735–40.
8. Петров С.Б., Новиков Р.В. Основные принципы операций по поводу рака почки. Практ онкол 2005;6(3):14–8.
9. Brandina R., Aron M. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: advances since 2005. Curr Opin Urol 2010;20(2):111–8.
10. Dindo D., Demartines D., Clavien P.-A. et al. Classification of surg. complications. Surgery 2004;240: 205–13.
11. Deklaj T., Lifshitz D.A., Shikanov S.A. et al. Laparoscopic radical versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1bN0M0 renal tumors: comparison of perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes. J Endourol 2010;24:1603–7.
12. Moinzadeh A., Gill I.S., Colombo J.R.Jr. et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: 3-year follow-up. J Urol 2006;175:459–62.
13. Cadeddu J.A., Ono Y., Clayman R.V. et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: evaluation of efficacy and safety: a multicenter experience. Urology 1998;52:773–7.
14. Slupski P., Jarzemski P., Listopadzki S. Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery: early results of 38 cases. EAU urology supplements, vol.8, sept. 2009.
15. Pace K.T., Dyer S.J., Stewart R.J. et al. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2003;17(1):143–52.
16. Siqueira T.M.Jr., Kuo R.L., Gardner T.A. et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol 2002;168 (4 Pt 1):1361 –5.
Review
For citations:
Popov S.V., Guseinov R.G., Borisenkov M.B., Novikov A.I., Skryabin O.N., Orlov I.N., Zaitsev E.V., Topuzov T.M., Manikhas G.M., Karlov P.A. COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL EVALUATION IN PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY CANCER AFTER ENDOVIDEOSURGICAL RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY AND RENAL RESECTION. Cancer Urology. 2013;9(2):21-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2013-9-2-21-25
Views:
1034
Email this article 