FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF ENDOSCOPIC EXTRAPERITONEAL RADICAL INTRAFASCIAL PROSTATECTOMY
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2014-10-2-46-52
Abstract
Introduction. Endoscopic radical prostatectomy is a highly effective treatment for localized prostate cancer. Intrafascial prostate dissection ensures early recovery of urine continence function and erectile function. This article sums up our own experience of performing intrafascial endoscopic prostatectomy.
Materials and methods. 25 patients have undergone this procedure. 12 months after surgery 88.2 % of the patients were fully continent, 11.7 % had symptoms of minimal stress urinary incontinence. We encountered no cases of positive surgical margins and one case of bio-chemical recurrence of the disease.
Conclusion. Oncologically, intrafascial endoscopic radical prostatectomy is as effective as other modifications of radical prostatectomy and has the benefits of early recovery of urine continence function and erectile function.
About the Authors
D. V. Perlin
Volgograd State Medical University; Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology, Volzhsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. V. Aleksandrov
Volgograd State Medical University; Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology, Volzhsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. D. Sapoghnikov
Volgograd State Medical University; Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology, Volzhsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. P. Zipunnikov
Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology, Volzhsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Rassweiler J., Schulze M., Teber D. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 2004;14:75–82.
2. Anastasiadis A.G., Salomon L., Katz R. et al. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 2003;62:292–7.
3. Barrй C. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;52:71–80.
4. Матвеев В.Б., Алексеев Б.Я. Лапароско-пическая хирургия в онкоурологии. М.: АБВ-пресс, 2007. 216 с.
5. Алексеев Б.Я., Нюшко К.М., Воробьев Н.В. и др. Частота и локализация метастазов в лимфатических узлах при выполнении радикальной простатэктомии и расширенной лимфаденэктомии у боль-ных раком предстательной железы. Онко-урология 2012;(1):77–82.
6. Stolzenburg J.U., Do M., Pfeiffer H. et al. The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol 2002;20:48–55.
7. Stolzenburg J.U., Schwalenberg T., Horn L.C. et al. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:629–39.
8. Walsh P.C., Donker P.J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982;128:492–7.
9. Menon M., Tewari A., Peabody J. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 2003;169:2289–92.
10. Costello A.J., Brooks M., Cole O.J. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and the cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 2004;94:1071–6.
11. Kiyoshima K., Yokomizo A., Yoshida T. et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn Clin Oncol 2004;34:463–8.
12. Stolzenburg J.U., Kallidonis P., Do M. et al. A comparison of outcomes for interfascial and intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010;76:743–8.
13. van der Poel H.G., de Blok W., Joshi N. et al. Preservation of lateral prostatic fascia is associated with urine continence after robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2009;55:892–900.
14. Stolzenburg J.U., Rabenalt R., Do M.et al. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008;53:931–40.
15. Noldus J., Michl U., Graefen M. et al. Patient-reported sexual function after nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2002;42:118–24.
16. Kundu S.D., Roehl K.A., Eggener S.E. et al. Potency, continence and complications in 3477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 2004;172:2227–31. 17. Do M., Haefner T., Liatsikos E. et al. Endoscopic еxtraperitoneal radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of prostate: oncologic and functional outcomes of 100 cases. Urology 2010;75:1348–52.
17. Stolzenburg J.U., Kallidonis P., Do M. et al. A comparison of outcomes for interfascial and intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010;76:743–8.
18. Potdevin L., Ercolani M., Jeong J. Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J Endourol 2009;23:1479–84.
19. Shikanov S., Woo J., Al-Ahmadie H. et al. Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics. Urology 2009;4:611–6.
Review
For citations:
Perlin D.V., Aleksandrov I.V., Sapoghnikov A.D., Zipunnikov V.P. FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF ENDOSCOPIC EXTRAPERITONEAL RADICAL INTRAFASCIAL PROSTATECTOMY. Cancer Urology. 2014;10(2):46-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2014-10-2-46-52
Views:
1035
Email this article 