Clinical and prognostic value of the cystostomy in patients with prostate cancer after combined treatment
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-3-87-91
Abstract
Objective – to assess the clinical and prognostic values of the cystostomy in patients with prostate cancer after hormonal or combined (ADT + radiation therapy) treatment.
Materials and methods. In the study included 185 prostate cancer patients with cystostomy. In all cases patients was treat hormonal
or ADT + radiation. The dependence of frequency cystostomy from baseline characteristics of the tumor was assessed. The effect of cystostomy also were compared with survival rates in patients depending on the tumor process.
Results. It was found that the frequency cystostomy in patients with prostate cancer significantly increases with the volume of the prostate, and the clinical tumor category, Gleason score do not have significant effect on the frequency of cystostomy. The enhancement of overall survivance in patients with generalized prostate cancer was founded in case of cystostomy removed. There was no significant differences in overall survivance rates in patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer after hormonal and hormonoradiation treatment.
About the Authors
S. A. Sidorova
Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Ministry of Health of the Russian; 70, Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. I. Shkolnik
Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Ministry of Health of the Russian; 70, Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Lebedynets
Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Ministry of Health of the Russian; 70, Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. M. Zharinov
Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Ministry of Health of the Russian; 70, Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Переверзев А.С., Коган М.И. Рак простаты. Харьков: Факт, 2004. [Pereverzev A.S., M.I. Kogan. Prostate Cancer. Kharkov: Fact, 2004. (In Russ.)].
2. Матвеев Б.П. Клиническая онкоурология. М: ИД «АБС-пресс», 2011. [Matveev B.P. Clinical Oncological Urology. М: Publishing House “ABC-press”, 2011. (In Russ.)].
3. Матвеев Б.П., Бухаркин Б.В., Матвеев В.Б. Рак предстательной железы. М., 1999. [ Matveev B.P. Prostate Cancer/B.P. Matveev, B.V. Bukharkin, V.B. Matveev. Мoscow, 1999. (In Russ.)].
4. Борисов В.В. Уродинамика при инфравезикальной обструкции у мужчин. Урология и нефрология 1999;(3):26–30. [Borisov V.V. Urodynamics at Infravesicular Obstruction in Men. Urologiya i nefrologiya = Journal of Neurology and Nephrology 1999;(3):26–30. (In Russ.)].
5. Montile J.E. The management of bladder outlet obstruction due to prostate cancer, untreated and after endocrine treatment. Prostate 1992. P.153–163.
6. Varenhorst E., Alund G. Urethral obstruction secondary to carcinoma of the prostate: response to endocrine treatment. Urology 1985;25(4):354–6.
7. Thomas D.J., Balaji V.J., Coptcoat M.J. et al. Acute urinary retention secondary to carcinoma of the prostate. Is initial channel TURP beneficial? J R Soc Med 1992;85:318–9.
8. Лопаткин Н.А., Сивков А.В., Камалов А.А. и др. Трансуре тральная резекция предстательной железы и лечебная так тика ведения больных с верифицированным и неверифицированным раком простаты. Материалы Пленума Правления российского общества урологов. М., 1999. С. 231–232. [Lopatkin N.A., Sivkov A.V., Kamalov A.A. et al. Transurethral resection of the prostate and management of patients with established and not established prostate cancer. Materials of the Plenary Meeting of Board of the Russian Society of Urologists. M., 1999. p. 231–232. (In Russ.)].
9. Mazur A.W., Thompson I.M. Efficacy and morbidity of “channel’ TURP. Urology 1991;38(6):526–8.
10. Durban M.D. Transurethral resection of prostate cancer: efficacy and morbidity. Arc. Es. Urol 1995;48(8):829–35.
11. Dirk P.J., Michielsen D.P., Coomans D. et al. Bipolar versus monopolar technique for palliative transurethral prostate resection. Arch Med Sci 2010;6(5):780–6.
12. Ассад О. Диагностика и лечение урологических осложнений у больных раком предстательной железы. Автореф. дис. … канд.мед.наук. М., 2002. [Assad O. Diagnostics and Treatment of Urologic Complications in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Synopsis of Thesis of … Ph.D. Med. Мoscow, 2002. (In Russ.)].
13. Rodríguez J.V., Chechile G. Usefulness of transurethral resection in cancer of the prostate. Arch Esp Urol 1989;42 (Suppl 2):165–77.
14. Losco G., Mark S., Jowitt S. Transurethral prostate resection for urinary retention: does age affect outcome? J Surg 2013;83(4):243–5.
15. Литвиненко А.Г. Бездренажный свищ мочевого пузыря (экспериментально-клинические исследования). Автореф. дис. … канд.мед.наук. Оренбург, 1971. [Litvinenko A.G. Bladder Fistula without Drain (Experimental and Clinical Studies). Synopsis of thesis … of Ph.D. Med. Orenburg, 1971. (In Russ.)].
16. Петлин А.В. Способ формирования запирательной цистостомы. Автореф. дис. … канд.мед.наук. Томск, 2001. [Petlin A.V. Methods of Obturative Cystostomу Formation: Synopsis of thesis … of Ph.D. Med. Tomsk, 2001. (In Russ.)].
17. Margolin D.J. Retrospective analysis of traumatic bladder injury: does suprapubic catheterization alter outcome of healing? Am Surg 2004;70(12):1057–60.
18. Narayanaswamy В., Wilcox D.T., Cuckow P.M.et al. The Yang-Monti ileovesicostomy: a problematic channel. B.Narayanaswamy, BJU Int 2001;87(9): 861–5.
19. Dobrowolski Z.F., Weglarz W., Jakubik P. et al. Treatment of posterior and anterior urethral trauma. BJU Int 2002;89(7):752–4.
20. Леонов О.В. Инвазивные технологии в паллиативном лечении распространенных форм рака предстательной железы. Автореф. дис. … канд.мед.наук. Омск, 2002. [Leonov O.V. Invasive Technologies in Palliative Treatment of Prevalent Forms of Prostate Cancer: Synopsis of thesis … of Ph.D. Med. Omsk, 2002. (In Russ.)].
21. Лопаткин Н.А. Урология: Национальное руководство. М: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2009. [Lopatkin N.A. Urology: National Guidelines. N.A. Lopatkin. М., 2009. (In Russ.)].
Review
For citations:
Sidorova S.A., Shkolnik M.I., Lebedynets A.A., Zharinov G.M. Clinical and prognostic value of the cystostomy in patients with prostate cancer after combined treatment. Cancer Urology. 2015;11(3):87-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-3-87-91
Views:
1530
Email this article 