COMPLETION TECHNOLOGY OF PELVIC SURGERY ACCOMPANYING WITH CYSTECTOMY
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-2-60-65
Abstract
Results of treatment of 143 patients who underwent cystprostatectomy or anterior pelvic exenteration. A comparative analysis of two groups of patients whose operation ended with the traditional drainage through the anterior abdominal wall (n = 71), and bilateral perineal drainage (n = 72). Bilateral perineal drainage after operations on the pelvic organs, accompanied by cystectomy and extended lymphadenectomy in conjunction with the restoration of the peritoneum lateral pelvic walls, improves postoperative recovery of intestinal peristalsis, promotes an earlier reduction in the intensity of pain and morbidity in the early postoperative period. Installation is simple perineal drainage performed and safe procedure. We recommend bilateral perineal drainage after operations on the pelvic organs, accompanied by cystectomy and extended lymphadenectomy.
About the Authors
I. P. Kostyuk
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
S. S. Krestyaninov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
A. Yu. Shestaev
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
K. G. Shostka
Leningrad Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. A. Vasilyev
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
Russian Federation
Department of Urology
V. H. Heyfec
Saint Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology, North-Western Branch, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. N. Pavlenko
Leningrad Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. F. Kagan
Saint Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology, North-Western Branch, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Konety B.R., Allareddy V., Herr H. Complications after radical cystectomy: analysis of population-based data. Urology 2006;68:58−64.
2. Quek M.L., Stein J.P., Daneshmand S. et al. A critical analysis of perioperative mortality from radical cystectomy. J Urol 2006;175: 886−90.
3. Аль-Шукри С.Х., Комяков Б.К., Горелов С.И. и др. Надпузырная деривация мочи при цистэктомии. В кн.: Рак мочевого пузыря: Материалы конференции. 21−22 мая. Ростов-на-Дону, 1998. С. 3−5.
4. Велиев Е.И., Лоран О.Б. Проблема отведения мочи после радикальной цистэктомии и современные подходы к ее решению. Практ онкол 2003;4(4):232−4.
5. Demco L. Pain mapping of adhesions. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004; 11:181−3.
6. Roth B., Birkhäuser F.D., Zehnder P. et al. Readaptation of the peritoneum following extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and cystectomy has a significant beneficial impact on early postoperative recovery and complications: results of a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol 2011;59:204−10.
7. Shabsigh A., Korets R., Vora K.C. et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 2009;55:164−76.
8. Studer U.E., Burkhard F.C., Schumacher M. et al. Twenty years experience with an ilealorthotopic low pressure bladder substitute. J Urol 2006;176:161−6.
9. Ghoneim M.A., el-Mekresh M.M., el-Baz M.A. et al. Radical cystectomy for carcinoma of the bladder: critical evaluation of the results in 1026 cases. J Urol;1997;158:393−9.
10. Van Goor H. Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9:25−34.
11. Hollenbeck B.K. Miller D.C., Taub D. et al. Identifying risk factors for potentially voidable complications following radical cystectomy. J Urol 2005; 174:1231−7.
12. Коган М.И., Перепечай В.А. Радикальная цистэктомия. Современный взгляд. В кн.: Актуальные вопросы лечения онкоурологических заболеваний: Материалы 4-й Всероссийской конференции с участием стран СНГ. М., 2001. С. 113−4.
13. Demco L. Pain mapping of adhesions. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004; 11:181−3.
14. Ellis H., Moran B.J., Thompson J.N. et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999;353:1476−80.
15. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205−13.
16. Комяков Б.К., Горелов С.И., Новиков А.И. Ближайшие результаты
17. радикальной операции при раке мочевого пузыря. Урология 2002;(2):15−9.
18. Kulkarni J.N., Gulia R.I., Tangaonkar H.B. et al. Radical сystoprostatectomy: an extraperitoneal retrograde approach. J Urol 1999; 161:545−8.
Review
For citations:
Kostyuk I.P., Krestyaninov S.S., Shestaev A.Yu., Shostka K.G., Vasilyev L.A., Heyfec V.H., Pavlenko A.N., Kagan O.F. COMPLETION TECHNOLOGY OF PELVIC SURGERY ACCOMPANYING WITH CYSTECTOMY. Cancer Urology. 2012;8(2):60-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-2-60-65
Views:
853
Email this article 