GEMCYTABIN (CYTOGEM®) AND CISPLATIN AS FIRST-LINE THERAPY FOR ADVANCED BLADDER CANCER: RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE OPEN-LABELED NON-COMPARATIVE NON-RANDOMIZED STUDY
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2009-5-4-46-49
Abstract
Purpose. The primary end-points of the study were overall response rate, progressive-free and overall survival in patients received Gemcytabin (Cytogem®) and Cisplatin as first-line therapy for transitional-cell bladder cancer. Secondary end-points were toxicity and safty of the regimen.
Material. From February 2005 to March 2007 25 patients with morphologically verified inoperable locally advanced and metastatic transitional-cell bladder cancer were recruited. Men-to-women ratio was 3:1. Median age of the patients was 66,5±6,8 years. All the patients received Cytogem® 1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 2; every 28 days. No more than 6 cycles were allowed if the evidence of disease progression and unacceptable toxicity were not registered. Median follow-up was 36,2±12,1 months.
Results. Complete response was observed in 2 (8%), partial — in 11 (44%), stabilization — in 10 (40%), progression — in 2 (8%) of 25 patients. Twelve- and 24-month overall survival was — 51,3% and 22,4% (median 13,4±3,5 (95% CI: 6,6—20,4) months), progressive- free survival — 26% and 13% respectively (median 8,8±1 (95% CI: 6,6—10,6) months). Toxicity was evaluated in 24 patients and occurred in all cases (grade I—II — 16 (67%), grade III—IV — 8 (33%)). The main regimen-related toxicity was hematological (neutropenia — 16 (67%) (grade I—II — 8 (33%), grade III—IV — 8 (33%)), thrombocytopenia — 14 (58%) (grade I—II — 10 (41,5%), grade III—IV — 4 (16,5%)), anemia — 7 (29%) (grade I—II — 5 (21%), grade III—IV — 2 (8%))). Hematological toxicity was not associated with com- plications in any case. Non-hematological side-effects were nausea and vomiting in 21 (88%) (grade I—II — 67%, grade III — 21%), alopecia — in 11 (44%) patients. The regimen-related toxicity was considerable and reversible. No side-effect demanded blood transfusion, antibiotic and/or growth factors administration, and hospital admission.
Conclusion. Gemcytabin (Cytogem®) and Cisplatin as first-line therapy for advanced transitional-cell bladder cancer have demonstrated satisfactory efficacy and acceptable toxicity. The regimen can be recommended for the clinical practice.
About the Authors
V. B. MatveevRussian Federation
M. I. Volkova
Russian Federation
M. M. Konstantinova
Russian Federation
L. V. Schapligin
Russian Federation
G. M. Manikhas
Russian Federation
References
1. Давыдов М.И., Аксель Е.М. Статистика злокачественных новообразований в России и странах СНГ в 2006 го- ду. М., 2008.
2. Sternberg C.N., Yagoda A., Scher H.I. et al. Preliminary results of M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) for transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. J Urol 1985;133:403—7.
3. Loehrer P.J. Sr, Einhorn L.H., Elson P.J. et al. A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1066—73.
4. Sternberg C.N., Yagoda A., Scher H.I. et al. Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxoru- bicin, and cisplatin for advanced transition- al cell carcinoma of the urothelial. Efficacy and patterns of response and relapse. Cancer 1989;64:2448—58.
5. Saxman S.B., Propert K.J., Einhorn L.H. et al. Long-term follow-up of a phase III intergroup study of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2564—9.
6. Von der Maase H. Gemcitabine in transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2003;3:11—9.
7. Von der Maase H., Hansen S.W., Roberts J.T. et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:3068—77.
8. Roberts J.T., von der Maase H., Sengel L. et al. Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine/cisplatin and methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer. Ann Oncol 2006;17(Suppl 5):118—22.
9. Kaufman D., Stadler W., Carducci M. et al. Gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin (CDDP) in metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCQ: final results of a phase II study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998;17:320. Abstr 1235.
10. Mancarella S., Lorusso V., Manzione L. et al. Gemcitabine/cisplatin in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract (TCQ: a phase II multicemer trial. Eur J Cancer 1999;35(Suppl 4):347. Abstr 1405.
11. Moore J.M., Winquist E.W., Murray N. et al. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin, an active regimen in advanced urothelial cancer: a phase II trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Clin Oncol 1999;17:2876—81.
Review
For citations:
Matveev V.B., Volkova M.I., Konstantinova M.M., Schapligin L.V., Manikhas G.M. GEMCYTABIN (CYTOGEM®) AND CISPLATIN AS FIRST-LINE THERAPY FOR ADVANCED BLADDER CANCER: RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE OPEN-LABELED NON-COMPARATIVE NON-RANDOMIZED STUDY. Cancer Urology. 2009;5(4):46-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2009-5-4-46-49