Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

EXPERIENCE WITH A NOVEL PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY TECHNIQUE FOR SUPERFICIAL BLADDER CARCINOMA

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2011-7-3-80-84

Abstract

Background. The advantage of our proposed therapy technique is to transit from the photodynamic diagnosis stage to effective therapeutic exposure (photodynamic therapy (PDT)) during one intervention.

Objective: to evaluate the efficiency and safety of the novel treatment option for superficial bladder carcinoma (BC).

Subjects and methods. The study enrolled 18 patients aged 66 ± 5 years (range 60−75 years) with superficial BC. A photosensitizer (photoditazine, Veta-Grand, Russia) was intravesically injected in a dose of 10 mg in 20 ml of saline solution 2 hours before intervention. Endoscopy was carried out on Storz PDT equipment with a monochrome light source at a wavelength of 402 nm, which corresponded to the maximum absorption spectrum for the molecule of photoditazine. The procedure was started with the PDT stage during which damaged bladder mucosal areas were found. Then there was transurethral resection of detected papillary masses and fluorescent areas with well-defined outlines. The fluorescent areas with ill-defined outlines underwent targeted light exposure at a wavelength of 402 nm for 5–10 min. The total light exposure of the bladder mucosa during the entire procedure was at least 30 min. The above procedure was performed in the patients at their inclusion into the study, then 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13 months later. The rates of complete tumor regression and adverse events were estimated during the study.

Results. Multifocal bladder mucosa lesion with invasion grades Ta, T1, Tis was detectable in all the patients at their inclusion into the study. Complete tumor regression was noted in 13 (72 %), 15 (83 %), and 17 (94 %) patients 1, 4, and 7 months after initiation of treatment, respectively. Following 10 and 13 months, no tumor tissue was found in the biopsy specimens from any patients. There were no evident local and systemic toxic reactions, including skin photosensitization.

Conclusions. The proposed technique versus the traditional treatments for superficial BC is advantageous in its high antitumor selectivity and the absence of obvious local and systemic toxic reactions (so in the possibility of multiple repetitions of a treatment procedure), and a complementary combination of photodynamic diagnosis and therapeutic exposure (PDT) during one procedure. Our proposed technique is a promising treatment for superficial BC, including carcinoma in situ.

About the Authors

O. F. Kagan
OrCli Hospital
Russian Federation


V. Kh. Kheifets
OrCli Hospital
Russian Federation


A. Yu. Plekhanov
Andros Clinic, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation


References

1. Аполихин О.И, Сивков А.В., Бешлиев Д.А. и др. Анализ уронефрологической заболеваемости в Российской Федерации по данным официальной статистики. Экспер и клинич урол 2010;(1):4−11.

2. Заболеваемость населения России в 2006 году: Статистические материалы: в II ч. М., 2007 (электронная версия МЗиCP РФ и ЦНИИ организации и инфор матизации здравоохранения МЗиCP РФ).

3. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2007 — Atlanta. American Cancer Sosiety 2007. 72 p.

4. Sobin D.H., Wittekind C.H., editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors, ed. 6-th. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2002; p. 199−202.

5. Oosterlinck W., Witres F., Sylvester R. Diagnostic and Prognostic Factors in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Their Influence on Treatment and Outcomes. Eur Urol 2008;4:321−4.

6. Sylvester R., Kurth K., Denis L. et al. Predicting the short-term and long-term prognosis of patients with Та Tl bladder cancer: Results of EORTC/MRC randomised clinical trials. Eur Urol 2001;39:471−80.

7. Thomas K., O'Brien T. Improving transurethral resection of bladder tumor: the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment of bladder tumors. Eur Urol 2008; 4:328−30.

8. Горелов С.И., Хейфец В.Х., Каган О.Ф. Метод флюоресцентной цистоскопии и его применение в диагностике поверхностного рака мочевого пузыря. Пособие для врачей. СПб., 2004. 32 с.

9. Матвеев Б.П., Бухаркин Б.В., Кудашев Б.В. и др. Использование визуального и спектрального анализов флюоресценции АЛК-индуцированного протопорфирина IX с целью повышения радикальности трансуретральных резекций мочевого пузыря. Лазер мед 2000;11(5):29−31.

10. Fradet Y., Grossman H.B., Gomella L. et al. A comparison of hexaminolevulinate fluorescence cystoscopy and white-light cystoscopy for the detection of carcinoma in situ in patients with bladder cancer: a phase III, multicenter study. J Urol 2007;178:68−73.

11. Van der Meijden А.М., Sylvester R, Oosterlinck W. et al. EAU guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of urothe lial carcinoma in situ. Eur Urol 2005; 48:361−71. 12. Friedrich M.G., Pichlmeier U., Schwaibold H. et al. Long-term intravesical adjuvant chemother apy further reduces the recurrence rate compared with short-term intravesical chemotherapy and short-term therapy with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. Eur Urol 2007;52:1123−30.

12. Sylvester R.J, Oosterlinck W., van der Meijden А.М. A single immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy decreases the risk of recurrence in patients with stage Та Т1 bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of published results of randomized clinical trials. J Urol 2004;171:2186 90.

13. Au J.S., Badalament R.A., Wientjes M.G. et al. Methods to improve efficacy of intravesical mitomycin C: results of a randomized phase III trial.J Nat Cancer Inst 2001;93:597−604.

14. Странадко Е. Ф. Исторический очерк развития фотодинамической терапии: Обзор. Лазер мед 2002(4):4−8.

15. Bamett A.A., Hatte J.C., Cairnduff F. et al. A randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial of photodynamic therapy using 5-aminolaevulinic acid for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer 2003; 103:829−32.

16. Странадко Е. Ф. Механизмы действия фотодинамической терапии. III Всероссийский симпозиум «Фотодинамическая терапия»: Сб. М., 1999; с. 3−15.

17. Moan J., Peng Q., Iani V. et al. Biodistribution, pharmacokinetic and in vivo fluorescence spectroscopic studies of photo sensitizers. SPIE 1995; 2625:234−48.

18. Странадко Е.Ф. Экспериментально-клиническая разработка метода лазерной фотодинамической терапии злокачественных опухолей с использованием отечественных фотосенсибилизаторов первого и второго поколения. Лазер маркет 1994(11−12):20−6.

19. Waidelich R., Beyer W., Knuchel R. et al. Whole bladder photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid using a white light source. Urology 2003; 61(2):332−7.

20. Huang Z. A review of progress in clinical photodynamic therapy.Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4(3): 283−93..


Review

For citations:


Kagan O.F., Kheifets V.Kh., Plekhanov A.Yu. EXPERIENCE WITH A NOVEL PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY TECHNIQUE FOR SUPERFICIAL BLADDER CARCINOMA. Cancer Urology. 2011;7(3):80-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2011-7-3-80-84

Views: 2801


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X