IMPROVED TECHNIQUE FOR ACHIEVING HEMOSTASIS DURING NEOPLASTIC KIDNEY RESECTION
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2009-5-1-14-19
Abstract
Due to the better diagnostic feasibilities of health care facilities, the proportion of patients with small renal tumors (T1a) has substantiallyincreased in recent years. In accordance with the international standards, these patients should undergo nephron-sparing surgery: neoplas-tic kidney resection. At Russian hospitals, organ-preserving treatment is not in adequate use for the technical difficulties associated withresection and for the likelihood of postoperative complications. The performed study has yielded a simple highly effective procedure ofnephrectomy in neoplasms, by using vasoselective parenchymatous sutures enhanced with polymer stripe-implants.
About the Authors
S. B. Petrov
Department of Urology, Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. S. Shpilenya
Department of Urology, Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Kukushkin
Department of Urology, Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. D. Shkarupa
Department of Urology, Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Vermooten V. Indications for conserva-tive surgery in certain renal tumors: a studybased in the growth pattern of the clear cellcarcinoma. J Urol 1950;60:200—4.
2. Robson C.J. Radical nephrectomy forrenal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1963;89:37—42.
3. Harry W.H. A history of partial nephrec-tomy for renal tumors. J Urol2005;173:705—8.
4. Матвеев В.Б., Перлин Д.В., Фигурин К.М., Волкова М.И. Органо-сохраняющее лечение рака почки.Практ онкол 2005;6(3):162—7.
5. Leibovich B.C., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C. Nephron sparing surgery forappropriately selected renal cell carcinomabetween 4 and 7 cm results in outcomesimilar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol2004;171(3):1066—70.
6. Lau W.K.O., Blute M.L., Torres V.E. et al. Matched comparison of radicalnephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery inpatients with unilateral renal cell carcino-ma and a normal contralateral kidney.Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:1236—42.
7. Лахмотко А.А. Отдаленные результа-ты органосохраняющих операций прираке почки: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед.наук. М., 1999.
8. Айвазян А.В. Гемостаз при операцияхна почке. М.: Наука, 1982.
9. Аляев Ю.Г. Крапивин А.А. Резекцияпочки при раке. М.: Медицина, 2001. с.42—51.
10. Thompson R.H., Leibovich B.C.,Lohse C.M. Complications of contempo-rary nephron-sparing surgery: a single insti-tution experience. J Urol 2005;174(1):42—7.
11. O'Connor C., Harding J.N., Steinberg G.D. et all. Novel modificationof partial nephrectomy technique usingporcine small intestine submucosa.Urology 2002;90:906—9.
12. Uzzo R.G., Novick A.C. Nephronsparing surgery for renal tumors: indica-tions, techniques and outcomes. J Urol2001;166:6—18.
Review
For citations:
Petrov S.B., Shpilenya E.S., Kukushkin A.V., Shkarupa D.D. IMPROVED TECHNIQUE FOR ACHIEVING HEMOSTASIS DURING NEOPLASTIC KIDNEY RESECTION. Cancer Urology. 2009;5(1):14-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2009-5-1-14-19
Views:
616
Email this article 