Metastasis suppressor kisspeptin (KISS1) in serum of patients with renal cell carcinoma

Background. The most important problems in improvement of treatment outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are search and validation of molecular markers for its early diagnosis and prognosis. Genes suppressing distant metastasizing but not affecting the primary tumor are called metastasis suppressors. Study of these genes and their products not only improves understanding of the mechanisms of tumor progression, but has practical value for diagnosis, prognosis, and establishment of new molecular targets for antitumor therapy. One of such genes is KISS1 with its product kisspeptin (KISS1) protein.

Aim: comparative evaluation of KISS1 concentration in blood serum of practically healthy persons and patients with renal cancer; analysis of correlations between the marker’s level and clinical and morphological characteristics of the disease.

Materials and methods. 140 patients with RCC (88 men, 52 women) aged between 29 and 82 years were included in the study. Among them, clear cell RCC was diagnosed in 84 patients, papillary in 38, chromophobe in 18. The control group was comprised of 40 healthy persons of matched age and sex. Pre-treatment KISS1 concentration in blood serum was measured using a direct enzyme immunoassay kit (Kisspeptin 1 – KISS1, Cloud-Clone Corp., USA).

Results. Median serum KISS1 concentration in the control group was 51.7 pg/mL which was significantly lower than in the total RCC patient group – 243.6 pg/mL (p <0.0001). ROC analysis of diagnostic value of serum KISS1 level was performed both for the total RCC group and for each of its three histological types. In the total group the sensitivity of the test was 75 %, specificity – 80 % (AUC 0.877; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.827–0.927; optimal cut-off level 130.8 pg/mL; р <0.0001). For clear cell RCC, both sensitivity and specificity were 85 % (AUC 0.941; 95 % CI 0.902– 0.979; cut-off 141.8 pg/mL; p <0.0001). In non-clear cell RCC types, sensitivity of this marker was only 58 % while the specificity remained 80 % (for papillary RCC AUC 0.787; 95 % CI 0.684–0.889; cut-off level 135.5 pg/mL; p <0.0001, and for chromophobe RCC AUC 0.774; 95 % CI 0.617–0.929; cut-off level 132.1 pg/mL; p <0.001). KISS1 level increased with disease progression: it is significantly higher at more advanced stages above stage I, and in patients with distant metastases compared to those without metastases. Higher serum KISS1 level is also observed in patients with poorly differentiated high-grade (per Furhman) clear cell RCC and papillary RCC (G₃–G₄) than in those with well differentiated low-grade (G1–G2) tumors.

Conclusion. KISS1 level is significantly increased in patients with RCC compared to healthy controls and is a stagedependent marker of this disease. It has relatively high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (both 85 %) for the most frequent histological type of RCC – clear cell RCC. Thus, clinical significance of kisspeptin in RCC requires further investigation.

1. Kushlinskii N.E., Gershtein E.S., Alferov A.A. et al. Prognostic role of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 7, 8, 9 and their type 1 tissue inhibitor in blood serum of patients with kidney cancer. Bull Exp Biol Med 2020;168(5):673–6. DOI: 10.1007/s10517-020-04778-w

2. Steeg P.S., Ouatas T., Halverson D. et al. Metastasis suppressor genes: basic biology and potential clinical use. Clin Breast Cancer 2003;4(1):51–62. DOI: 10.3816/cbc.2003.n.012

3. Ly T., Harihar S., Welch D.R. KISS1 in metastatic cancer research and treatment: potential and paradoxes. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2020;39(3):739–54. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09868-9

4. Harihar S., Welch D.R. KISS1 metastasis suppressor in tumor dormancy: a potential therapeutic target for metastatic cancers? Cancer Metastasis Rev 2023;42(1):183–96. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-023-10090-6

5. Hu K.L., Chang H.M., Zhao H.C. et al. Potential roles for the kisspeptin/kisspeptin receptor system in implantation and placentation. Hum Reprod Update 2019;25(3):326–43. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy046

6. Wang C.H., Qiao C., Wang R.C., Zhou W.P. KiSS-1-mediated suppression of the invasive ability of human pancreatic carcinoma cells is not dependent on the level of KiSS-1 receptor GPR54. Mol Med Rep 2016;13(1):123–9. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4535

7. Wang W., Yang Z.L., Liu J.Q. et al. Overexpression of MTA1 and loss of KAI-1 and KiSS-1 expressions are associated with invasion, metastasis, and poor-prognosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Tumori 2014;100(6):667–74. DOI: 10.1700/1778.19276

8. Teng Y., Mei Y., Hawthorn L., Cowell J.K. WASF3 regulates miR-200 inactivation by ZEB1 through suppression of KISS1 leading to increased invasiveness in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2014;33(2):203–11. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2012.565

9. Zhu N., Zhao M., Song Y. et al. The KiSS-1/GPR54 system: Essential roles in physiological homeostasis and cancer biology. Genes Dis 2022;9(1):28–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.07.008

10. Ohtaki T., Shintani Y., Honda S. et al. Metastasis suppressor gene KiSS-1 encodes peptide ligand of a G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 2001;411(6837):613–7. DOI: 10.1038/35079135

11. Kuohung W., Kaiser U.B. GPR54 and KiSS-1: role in the regulation of puberty and reproduction. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2006;7(4):257–63. DOI: 10.1007/s11154-006-9020-2

12. Francis V.A., Abera A.B., Matjila M. et al. Kisspeptin regulation of genes involved in cell invasion and angiogenesis in first trimester human trophoblast cells. PLoS One 2014;9(6):e99680. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099680

13. Ciaramella V., Della Corte C.M., Ciardiello F., Morgillo F. Kisspeptin and cancer: molecular interaction, biological functions, and future perspectives. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2018;9:115. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00115

14. Loosen S.H., Luedde M., Lurje G. et al. Serum levels of kisspeptin are elevated in patients with pancreatic cancer. Dis Markers 2019;2019:5603474. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5603474

15. Canbay E., Ergen A., Bugra D. et al. Kisspeptin-54 levels are increased in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Surg 2012;36(9):2218–24. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1636-7

16. Ergen A., Canbay E., Bugra D. et al. Plasma Kisspeptin-54 levels in gastric cancer patients. Int J Surg 2012;10(9):551–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.08.014

17. Gatti L., Rolli L., Corno C. et al. Increased serum levels of KiSS1- derived peptides in non-small cell lung cancer patient liquid biopsies and biological relevance. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2022;11(7):1315–26. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-22-52

18. Harihar S., Ray S., Narayanan S. et al. Role of the tumor microenvironment in regulating the anti-metastatic effect of KISS1. Clin Exp Metastasis 2020;37(2):209–23. DOI: 0.1007/s10585-020-10030-6

19. Zheng S., Chang Y., Hodges K.B. et al. Expression of KISS1 and MMP-9 in non-small cell lung cancer and their relations to metastasis and survival. Anticancer Res 2010;30(3):713–8.