Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

CONTINENT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2013-9-3-43-47

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the impact of dissection of the dorsal venous complex without pre-ligation, suturing, or coagulation during radical prostatectomy (RPE) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PC) on the quality of surgery and the function of urinary retention.

Subjects and methods. The data of 42 patients who had undergone posterior and anterior anatomical repair and vesicourethral anastomosis using a V-lock suture after prostatectomy were analyzed. All the patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 22 patients in whom the dorsal venous complex was closed using a 3-0 vicryl suture before urethral dissection. Group 2 included 20 patients in whom the urethra was dissected without suturing the venous complex.

Results. In group 1, complete urinary retention after catheter removal was noted in 9 (40.9 %) and 15 (68 %) patients within 24 hours and after 3 months, respectively. Following 12 months, two (9 %) patients were observed to have partial mild urinary incontinence (as many as 2 pads per day). Group 2 patients showed complete urinary retention in 17 (85 %) cases on the first day after catheter removal; all the patients retained urine 3 months later.

Conclusion. In patients with localized PC, dissection of the dorsal venous complex without presuturing during laparoscopic RPE exerts a considerable impact on the preservation of urinary retention, namely 45% more of the patients reported complete urinary retention in early periods and 10 % more did this in later periods. At the same time, there was no statistically significant increase in intraoperative blood loss (p > 0.05), the number of positive edges, or biochemical recurrences.

About the Authors

Yu. P. Sernyak
M. Gorky Donetsk National Medical University
Ukraine

Department of Urology, Internship and Postgraduate Training



А. S. Fukszon
M. Gorky Donetsk National Medical University
Ukraine

Department of Urology, Internship and Postgraduate Training



Yu. V. Roshchin
M. Gorky Donetsk National Medical University
Ukraine

Department of Urology, Internship and Postgraduate Training



A. S. Frolov
M. Gorky Donetsk National Medical University
Ukraine

Department of Urology, Internship and Postgraduate Training



References

1. Miller B.A., Ries L.A.G., Hankey B.F. et al. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 1994. Медицинские Диссертации http://medical-diss.com/medicina/osnovnyenapravleniya-razrabotki-i-realizatsiigorodskoy-protivorakovoyprogrammy#ixzz2f3EhMHYX.

2. Boring C.C., Squires T.S., Tong T. Cancer Statistics,1993. CA Cancer J Clin 1993;43:7–26.

3. Бойченко А.В. Рак предстательной железы в Украине: взгляд на проблему. Онкология 2011;1.

4. Takenaka A., Murakami G., Matsubara A. et al. Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. Urology 2005;65:136–42.

5. Wieder J.A., Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1998;160:299–315.

6. Лоран О.Б., Велиев Е.И., Петров С.Б. Частота и локализация позитивного хирургического края и его роль в прогнозировании рецидива рака предстательной железы. Урология 2004;6:19–21.

7. Walsh P.C., Marschke P., Ricker D. et al. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000;55:58.

8. Rocco F., Carmignani L., Acquati P. et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2006;175:2201–6.

9. Rocco F., Gadda F., Acquati P. et al. Personal research: reconstruction of the urethral striated sphincter. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2001;73:127–37.

10. Tewari A.K., Bigelow K., Rao S. et al. Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;69:726–31.

11. Tewari A., El-Hakim A., Rao S. et al. Identification of the retrotrigonal layer as a key anatomical landmark during robotically assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2006;98:829–32.


Review

For citations:


Sernyak Yu.P., Fukszon А.S., Roshchin Yu.V., Frolov A.S. CONTINENT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. Cancer Urology. 2013;9(3):43-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2013-9-3-43-47

Views: 946


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X