IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC KIDNEY CANCER: ITS ROLE AT THE PRESENT STAGE AND PROSPECTS FOR CLINICAL APPLICATION

With the clinical introduction of targeted drugs, the results of therapy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) of all prognostic groups as witnessed by the data of randomized trials. Nevertheless, there is a group of favorable prognosis patients (MSKCC) that may use first-line immunotherapy equally with a targeted approach without apparently affecting overall survival. As a rule, these are the patients who have no symptoms of the disease with the primary tumor being removed and the disease is being minimally disseminated. At the same time, how long very rare (1 %) complete remissions achieved by targeted drugs last, whether they can transformed into complete recovery, and how this may be observed in 3–4 % of cases when immune therapeutic options are used in favorable prognosis patients remain to be investigated. Due to the fact that nonspecific therapy involving cytokines fails to overcome fully the phenomenon of immunological tumor tolerance and has limited antitumor activity, the clinical trials are actively studying the efficiency of more specific immunotherapeutic approaches, such as anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies, as well as different vaccination types.

Thus, there is an opportunity to make the immunotherapeutic approach molecular targeted and to integrate it into a drug treatment algorithm for patients with mRCC. Accordingly, the priority for additional clinical trials is to identify predictive markers of response (or resistance) to immunotherapy that can rationalize and individualize this therapeutic approach.

1. Parkin D.M., Bray F., Ferlay J., Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55(2):74–108.

2. Tsimafeyeu I., Aksel E. Renal cell carcinoma in the Russian Federation in 2008. J Malignant Tumors 2010;2:3–4.

3. Motzer R.J. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with stage 4 renal cell carcinoma: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:6302–3.

4. Ljungberg B., Landberg G., Alamdari F.I. Factors of importance for prediction of survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, treated with or without nephrectomy. J Urol Nephrol 2000;34:246–51.

5. McDermott D.F., Regan M.M., Clark J.I et al. Randomized phase III trial of high-dose interleukin-2 versus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(1):133–41.

6. Bukowski R.M. Natural history and therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The role of interleukin-2. Cancer 1997;80:1198–220.

7. Gerlinger M., Rowan A.J., Horswell S. et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012;366(10):883–92.

8. Motzer R.J., Bacik J., Murphy B. et al. Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(1):289–96.

9. Atzpodien J., Kirchner H., Illiger H.J. et al. IL-2 in combination with IFN-alpha and 5-FU versus tamoxifen in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: long-term results of a controlled randomized clinical trial. Br J Cancer 2001; 85(8):1130–6.

10. Motzer R.J., Hutson T.E., Tomczak P. et al. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007;356:115–24.

11. Escudier B., Koralewski P., Pluzanska A. et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind phase III study (AVOREN) of bevacizumab/ interferon-2a vs placebo/interferon-2a as first-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2s (suppl; abstr. 3).

12. Hudes G., Carducci M., Tomczak P. et al. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2271–81.

13. Sternberg C., Davis I.D., Mardiak J. et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1061–8.

14. Rini B., Halabi S., Rosenberg J. et al. Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa versus interferon alfa monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final results of CALGB 90206. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2137–43.

15. Mansh M. Ipilimumab and cancer immunotherapy: A new hope for advanced stage melanoma. Yale J Biol Med 2011; 84(4):381–9.

16. Yang J.C., Hughes M., Kammula U. et al. Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4 antibody) causes regression of metastatic renal cell cancer associated with enteritis and hypophysitis. J Immunother 2007;30(8):825–30.

17. Thompson R.H., Dong H., Kwon E.D. Implications of B7-H1 expression in clear cell carcinoma of the kidney for prognostication and therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13(2 Pt 2):709–15.

18. Topalian S.L., Hodi S., Brahmer J.R. et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366(26):2443–54.

19. Gabrilovich D.I., Ishida T., Nadaf S. et al. Antibodies to vascular endothelial growth factor enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy by improving endogenous dendritic cell function. Clin Cancer Res1999;5:2963–70.

20. Gabrilovich D. Mechanisms and functional significance of tumourinduced dendritic-cell defects. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:941–52.

21. Ko J.S., Zea A.H., Rini B.I. et al. Sunitinib mediates reversal of myeloidderived suppressor cell accumulation in renal cell carcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:2148–57.

22. Ko J.S., Rayman P., Ireland J. et al. Direct and differential suppression of myeloidderived suppressor cell subsets by sunitinib is compartmentally constrained. Cancer Res 2010;70:3526–36.

23. Amin A.D.A., Logan T. A phase II study testing the safety and activity of AGS-003 as an immunotherapeutic in subjects with newly diagnosed advanced stage renal cell carcinom in combination with sunitinib. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4588.