Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

Laparoscopic management renal cell carcinoma in left kidney with tumor caval thrombus

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-1-32-39

Abstract

Background.Treatment of level II-III inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus for left renal cell carcinoma is among the most challenging open urologic oncologic surgeries with 38 % complications and 4—10 % mortality rate. There are increasing numbers of centers using a right side laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy at last years but only few reports about laparoscopic management of IVC thrombus from left kidney.

The study objectiveis to demonstrate reproducibility and relative safety of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy of IVC tumor thrombus originating from the left kidney.

Materials and methods. We describe the method and present the initial series of full laparoscopic level II-III IVC thrombectomy in three patients with tumor in left kidney. One patient had been diagnosed distant metastases before operation, the another — pancreas involvement in the tumor process. The follow up time consist 4—26 months after surgery.

Results. All procedures completed without conversion to open surgery. Tumor sizes were 5—16 cm, length of thrombus in IVC — 2.4—7.0 cm. Volume of blood loss ranged from 300 to 2500 ml. One patient received blood transfusion after surgery. One patient have died because of distant metastases 5 months after surgery. Two others were alive at 4 and 26 months follow-up without signs of progression.

Conclusion.Laparoscopic IVC tumor thrombectomy for level II-III thrombi in cases of left kidney cancer is feasible, safe. This kind of pro­cedure doesn’t lead to serious perioperative complications and can gain a quicker recovery after surgery. It needs more operations and longer follow-up for evaluation oncological efficiency.

About the Authors

D. V. Perlin
Volgograd State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology
Russian Federation

1 Pavshykh Bortsov Ploshchad, Volgograd 400131; 86 im. Generala Karbysheva St., Volzhsky 404120


Competing Interests: no conflict of interest


I. V. Alexandrov
Volgograd State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology
Russian Federation

1 Pavshykh Bortsov Ploshchad, Volgograd 400131; 86 im. Generala Karbysheva St., Volzhsky 404120


Competing Interests: no conflict of interest


I. N. Dymkov
Volgograd State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology
Russian Federation

1 Pavshykh Bortsov Ploshchad, Volgograd 400131; 86 im. Generala Karbysheva St., Volzhsky 404120


Competing Interests: no conflict of interest


A. O. Shmanev
Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology
Russian Federation

86 im. Generala Karbysheva St., Volzhsky 404120


Competing Interests: no conflict of interest


References

1. Alekseev B.Ya., Kalpinskiy A.S., Mukhomed’yaгovа A.A. et al. Targeted therapy in patients with poor-prognosis renal cell carcinoma. Onkourologiya = Can-cer Urology 2017;13(2):49— 55. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2017-13-2-49-55

2. Volkova M.I., Chernyaev V.A., Klimov A.V. et al. Nephrectomy, inferior vena cava thrombectomy in renal cell carcinoma with tumor venous thrombosis and pulmonary metastases. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2018;14(1):28—35. (In Russ.).

3. Gill I., Metcalfe C., Abreu A. et al. Robotic level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: initial series. J Urol 2015;194(4):929—38. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.119. PMID: 25858419.

4. Blute M., Leibovich B., Lohse C. et al. The Mayo Clinic experience with surgical management, complications and outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumour thrombus. BJU Int 2004;94(1):33—41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04897.x. PMID: 15217427.

5. Chopra S., Simone G., Metcalfe C. et al. Robot-assisted level II—III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: step-by-step technique and 1-year outcomes. Eur Urol 2017;72(2):267-74. DOI: 0.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.066. PMID: 27663048.

6. Desai M., Gill I., Ramani A. et al. Lapa¬roscopic radical nephrectomy for cancer with level i renal vein involvement. J Urol 2003;169(2):487—91. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200302000-00012. PMID: 12544294.

7. Abaza R. Initial series of robotic radical nephrectomy with vena caval tumor thrombectomy. Eur Urol 2011;59(4):652—6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.038. PMID: 20846783.

8. Bratslavsky G., Cheng J.S. WITH¬DRAWN: robotic-assisted radical ne¬phrectomy with retrohepatic vena caval tumor thrombectomy (level III) combined with extended retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urology 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.009. PMID: 26321150.

9. Shao P., Li J., Qin C. et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and inferior vena

10. cava thrombectomy in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2015;68(1):115—22. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.011. PMID: 25534934.

11. Wang B., Li H., Ma X. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic inferior vena cava thrombectomy: different sides require different techniques. Eur Urol 2016;69(6):1112—9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.001. PMID: 26706105.

12. Ramirez D., Maurice M.J., Cohen B. et al. Robotic level III IVC tumor thrombectomy: duplicating the open approach. Urology 2016;90:204-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.011. PMID: 26802799.

13. Xu B., Zhao Q., Jin J. et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for renal masses with infrahepatic tumor thrombus: the largest series of retroperitoneal experience from China. J Endourol 2014;28(2):201-7. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0519. PMID: 24032413.


Review

For citations:


Perlin D.V., Alexandrov I.V., Dymkov I.N., Shmanev A.O. Laparoscopic management renal cell carcinoma in left kidney with tumor caval thrombus. Cancer Urology. 2019;15(1):32-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-1-32-39

Views: 1245


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X