Review of the article “Comparative analysis of intra- and postoperative complications of retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic nephrectomy for large tumors”
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-4-29
About the Author
D. V. Perlin
Волгоградский государственный медицинский университет МЗ РФ
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: no conflict of interest
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: no conflict of interest
References
1.
2. Ren T., Liu Y., Zhao X. et al. Transperitoneal approach versus retroperitoneal approach: a meta-analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e91978. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091978. PMID: 24658032.
3. Taue R., Izaki H., Koizumi T. et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a comparative study. Int J Urol 2009;16(3):263–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02219.x. PMID: 19087210.
4. Disanto V., Pansadoro V., Portoghese F. et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma with infrahepatic vena caval thrombus. Eur Urol 2005;47(3):352–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.11.010. PMID: 15716200.
5. Wang W., Wang L., Xu J. et al. Pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for right renal masses with renal vein and inferior vena cava thrombus. J Endourol 2014;28(7):819–24. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0066. PMID: 24635408.
Review
For citations:
Review of the article “Comparative analysis of intra- and postoperative complications of retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic nephrectomy for large tumors”. Cancer Urology. 2018;14(4):29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-4-29
Views:
783
Email this article 