Comparative analysis of intra- and postoperative complications of retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic nephrectomy for large tumors
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-4-22-28
Abstract
The objective is to perform comparative analysis of intra- and postoperative complications of retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RRN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for large tumors.
Materials and methods. The study includes examination and treatment data for 108 patients with stage T1—3a renal cell carcinoma.
Results and conclusion. A number of advantages of RRN compared to LRN were demonstrated associated with shorter surgery duration with fast processing of the renal pedicle, lower blood loss, lower use of analgesics in the postoperative period, shorter duration of hospitalization, and quick recovery after the surgery. The rate of intra- and postoperative complications for RRN was 19.2 and 17.3 %, for LRN — 33.9 and 37.5 %, respectively. Complications associated with abdominal organs were absent for RRN. After LRN, the rate of serious complications was significantly higher than after RRN.
About the Authors
Z. A. Kadyrov
Department of Endoscopic Urology, Faculty of Professional Development for Health Care Employees, Medical Institute of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
4 Kolomenskiy Proezd, Moscow 117198.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. Yu. Odilov
Department of Endoscopic Urology, Faculty of Professional Development for Health Care Employees, Medical Institute of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
4 Kolomenskiy Proezd, Moscow 117198.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
D. M. Yagudaev
Central Clinical Hospital 2 named after N.A. Semashko JSC "Russian Railways"; Department of Endoscopic Urology, Faculty of Professional Development for Health Care Employees, Medical Institute of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
4 Kolomenskiy Proezd, Moscow 117198.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Ritchey M.L., Kelalis P.P., Breslow N. et al. Surgical complications after nephrectomy for Wilms’ tumor. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175(6):507—14. PMID: 1333095.
2. Khovari L.F. Immediate results of surgical treatment of patients with renal-cell cancer. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research 2011;(11):269—371. (In Russ.)].
3. Simon S.D., Castle E.P., Ferrigni R.G. et al. Complications of laparoscopic ne-phrectomy: the Mayo clinic experience. J Urol 2004;171(4):1447—50. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000117942.61971.41. PMID: 15017195.
4. El-Tohamy S.A., Shello H.M. Retroperi-toneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopy for simple nephrectomy. Egypt J Anaesth 2013;29:109-16.
5. Matsuda T., Uchida J., Muguruma K. et al. Complications in urological laparoscopic surgery. Hinyokika Kiyo 1993;39(4):337—43. PMID: 850333.
6. Fahlenkamp D., Rassweiler J., Fornara P. et al. Complication of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers. J Urol 1999;162(3):765—70. PMID: 10458362.
7. Eskicorapci S.Y., Teber D., Schulze M. et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the new gold standard surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma. Scientific World Journal 2007;9(7):825—36. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2007.153. PMID: 17619767.
8. Schwartz M.J., Faiena I., Cinman N. et al. Laparoscopic bowel injury in retroperitoneal surgery: current incidence and out-comes. J Urol 2010;184(2):589—94. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.133. PMID: 20639022.
9. Yamamoto M., Minikel L., Zaritsky E. Laparoscopic 5-mm trocar site herniation and literature review. JSLS 2011;15(1): 122—6. DOI: 10.4293/108680811X1302298 5131697. PMID: 21902958.
10. Klap J. 1000 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract: Analysis of complications. Eur Urol Suppl 2017;16(3):456—9.
11. McAllister M., Bhayani S.B., Ong A. et al. Vena caval transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: report of the complication and review of the literature. J Urol 2004;172(1):183—5. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132143.33340.51. PMID: 15201767.
12. Selijuk E., Oner §., Tzevat T., Tayfun O. et al. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy has better perioperative outcomes than transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in obese patients. Turkish J Urol 2012;38(2):80—7. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2012.019.
13. Romaschenko N.N. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in treatment of patients with renal cancer. Autor’s ab-stract of thesis ... of candidate medical sciences. Moscow, 2007. 102 p.
14. Ha U.S., Hwang T.K., Kim YJ. et al. Comparison of oncological outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for the management of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. BJU Int 2011;107(9):1467— 72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09636.x. PMID: 20825400.
15. Pierorazio P.M., Hyams E.S., Lin B.M. et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal masses: critical assessment of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of stage T2a and T2b tumors. Urology 2012;79(3):570—5. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.065. PMID: 22386399.
16. Kadyrov Z.A. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic surgeries in urology. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2017. 488 p. (In Russ.).
17. Kadyrov Z.A. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgeries in urology. Moscow: BINOM, 2012. 183 p. (In Russ.).
18. Zhu X., Yang X., Hu X., Zhang X. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for 152 Chinese patients with large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: a long-term retrospective comparison. J Cancer Res Ther 2016;12(2):805—10. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.186693. PMID: 27461655.
19. Fan X., Xu K., Lin T., et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and metaanalysis. BJU Int 2013;111(4):611—21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11598.x. PMID: 23106964.
Review
For citations:
Kadyrov Z.A., Odilov A.Yu., Yagudaev D.M. Comparative analysis of intra- and postoperative complications of retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic nephrectomy for large tumors. Cancer Urology. 2018;14(4):22-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-4-22-28
Views:
901
Email this article 