Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

CLINICAL STAGING OF CANCER OF THE PROSTATE DURING ITS PRIMARY BIOPSY

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2010-6-2-45-49

Abstract

Clinical staging of cancer is the important element of a diagnostic process that determines the nature and scope of therapeutic measures required for a patient. Objective: to assess the role of clinical, clinical laboratory, and morphological findings in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) and to analyze the pattern of its clinical stages in patients having different levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the results of digital rectal examination (DRE) and ultrasound study (USS) of the gland. Subjects and methods. The examination and follow-up records were analyzed in 2579 males aged 38-88 years who had indications for primary puncture biopsy of the prostate. Results. PC was detected in 997 (38.66%) patients. Clinically localized adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 50.85% of cases, locally advanced one being in 49.15%, including that with its invasion into the seminal vesicles in 8.73%. The findings of DRE and transrectal USS and serum PSA values allow one to substantially define the likely extent of cancer.

About the Authors

S. B. Petrov
Department of Urology, Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation


S. A. Rakul
Department of Urology, Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation


A. V. Zhivov
Andros Medical Center
Russian Federation


R. A. Eloyev
Department of Urology, Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation


A. Yu. Plekhanov
Andros Medical Center
Russian Federation


P. V. Kharchenko
Department of Urology, Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation


References

1. Hernandez J., Thompson I.M. Prostatespecific antigen: a review of the validation of the most commonly used Cancer biomarker. Cancer 2004;101:894-904.

2. Teahan S.J., Klotz L.H. Current role of prostate-specific antigen kinetics in managing patients with prostate cancer. Br J Urol Int 2006; 97: 451-5.

3. Hodge K.K., McNeal J.E., Terris M.K.,Stamey T.A. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989;142:71-4.

4. Cooperberg M.R., Broering J.M.,Litwin M.S. et al. The contemporary management of prostate cancer in the United States: lessons from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor (CapSURE), a national disease registry. J Urol 2004;171(4):1393-401.

5. Shah J.B., McKiernan J.M.,Elkin E.P. et al. Prostate biopsy patterns in the CaPSURE database: evolution with time and impact on outcome after prostatectomy. J Urol 2008;179(1):136-40.

6. Лоран О.Б. Рак простаты: современный взгляд на проблему. В кн.: Материалы XI съезда урологов России. М., 2007. с. 5-13.

7. Ильин К.А., Магер В.О., Завацкий С.Е. и др. Анализ результатов биопсий пред-стательной железы в лечебных учрежде-ниях Екатеринбурга за 2000-2006 гг. Он-коурология 2008; (4):33-7.

8. Sobin L.H., Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. Wiley, 2002.


Review

For citations:


Petrov S.B., Rakul S.A., Zhivov A.V., Eloyev R.A., Plekhanov A.Yu., Kharchenko P.V. CLINICAL STAGING OF CANCER OF THE PROSTATE DURING ITS PRIMARY BIOPSY. Cancer Urology. 2010;6(2):45-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2010-6-2-45-49

Views: 714


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X