Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

Efficiency and safety of organ-sparing surgery for locally advanced kidney cancer

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-1-20-25

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the efficiency of surgical treatment in patients with locally advanced kidney cancer (KC), by comparing the immediate and late results of organ-sparing surgery (OSS) and nephrectomies.
Subjects and methods. The results of surgical treatment were analyzed in 251 patients with KC who had undergone OSS (n = 124) or nephrectomy (n = 127). The groups were matched for gender, age, stage, and baseline glomerular filtration rate. Surgical complications were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 
Results. There were no significant differences between the two patient groups in the amount of blood loss (median 300 ml) and in the hospital length of stay. The median renal ischemia time was 15.0±3.4 min. Complications after OSS and nephrectomies occurred in 10.4 and 4.7% of cases. The OSS group was found to tend to have higher 5-year overall survival rates (89.1%) than the nephrectomy group (70.6%) (p = 0.248). Conclusion. OSS is an effective, safe treatment option for KC, at the same time it is still inadequately frequently used in wide clinical practice. The OSS group was found to tend to have higher 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates than the nephrectomy group (p > 0.05). 

About the Authors

G. N. Alekseeva
Vladivostok Clinical Hospital Two; 57, Russkaya St., Vladivostok 690105, Russia;
Russian Federation


L. I. Gurina
Primorye Territorial Oncology Dispensary; 59, Russkaya St., Vladivostok 690105, Russia
Russian Federation


B. V. Mazalov
Vladivostok Clinical Hospital Two; 57, Russkaya St., Vladivostok 690105, Russia;
Russian Federation


A. G. Filippov
Vladivostok Clinical Hospital Two; 57, Russkaya St., Vladivostok 690105, Russia;
Russian Federation


M. V. Volkov
Primorye Territorial Oncology Dispensary; 59, Russkaya St., Vladivostok 690105, Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2012 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М., 2014. 250 с. [Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2012 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. A.D. Caprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. M., 2014. 250 p. (In Russ.)]

2. Parkin D.M., Bray F., Ferlay J., Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74–108.

3. Матвеев Б.П. Опухоли почечной паренхимы. В кн.: Клиническая онкоурология. Под ред. Б.П. Матвеева. М.: АБВ-пресс, 2011. С. 11–225. [Matveev B.P. Tumors of the renal parenchyma. In: Clinical oncourology. Ed. B.P. Matveev. M.: ABV-press, 2011. P. 11–225. (In Russ.)]

4. Волкова М.И., Скворцов И.Я., Климов А.В. и др. Влияние объема хирургического вмешательства на функциональные результаты и кардиоспецифическую выживаемость у больных клинически локализованным раком почки. Онкоурология 2014;3:22–30. [Volkova, M.I., Skvortsov I.J., Klimov A.V. et al. Influence of surgical intervention on functional outcome and survival in cardiac patients clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. Onkourologija = Oncourology 2014;3:22–30. (In Russ.)].

5. Аляев Ю.Г., Глыбочко П.В., Григорян З.Г. Органосохраняющие операции при опухоли почки. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2009. 272 с. [Alyaev J.G. Ablative surgery for kidney tumors. Alyaev J.G., Glybochko P.V., Grigoryan Z.G. et al. M.: GEOTAR–Media, 2009. 272 p. (In Russ.)]

6. Long C.J., Canter D. J., Kutikov A. et al. Partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥ 7 cm: technical, oncological and functional outcomes. BJU Int 2012;109:1450–6.

7. Amit R., Patel A.R., Eggener S.E. Warm ischemia less than 30 minutes is not necessarily safe during partial nephrectomy: every minute matters. Urol Oncol 2011;29(6):826–8.

8. Khed M., Bellec L., Leobon B. et al. Partial nephrectomy by selective renal parenchymal clamping using a new clamp. Prog Urol 2007;17(1):41–4.

9. Clavien P.A., Barkun J., de Oliviera M.L. et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187–96.

10. Есаян А.М., Аль-Шукри С.Х., Мосоян М.С. Почечно-клеточный рак и хроническая болезнь почек: внимание к отдаленным неонкологическим исходам. Нефрология 2012;16(4):94–9. [Yesayan A.M., Al-Shukri S.H., Mosoyan M.S. Renal cell carcinoma and chronic kidney disease: attention to remote non-cancer outcomes. Nephrology 2012;16(4):94–9.

11. Van Poppel H., Pozzo Da L., Albrecht W. A prospektive, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephronsparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol2011;59:543–52.

12. Kim S.P. Comparative effectiveness for survival and renal function of partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2012;188(1):51–7.

13. Weight C.J., Lieser G., Larson B.T. et al. Partial nephrectomy is associated with improved overall survival compared to radical nephrectomy in patients with unanticipated benign renal tumors. Eur Urol 2010;58: 293–8.

14. Аполихин О.И., Чернышев И.В., Павлов Д.А. и др. Тенденции развития эндовидеохирургии локализованного рака почки. Мат-лы XIV конгресса РОУ. Саратов, 2014 г. С. 247–248. [Apolikhin O.I., Chernyshev I.V., Pavlov D.A. et al. Development trends endovideosurgery localized kidney cancer. Proceedings of the XIV Congress of the ROU. Saratov, 2014. Р. 247–248 (In Russ.)].

15. Leibovich B.C., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C. et al. Prediction of progression afte radical nefrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tooll for prospective clinical trials. Cancer 2003;97(7):1663–71. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov./pub. med./1265523.

16. Thompson R.H., Lane B.R., Lohse C.M. et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2010;58:340–5.

17. Gill I.S., Patil M.B., de Castro Abreu A.L. et al. Zero ischemia anatomical partial nephrectomy: a novel approach. J Urol 2012;187(3):807–15.

18. Матвеев В.Б., Комаров И.Г., Волкова М.И. и др. Безопасность и целесообразность использования трансперитонеального лапароскопического доступа для выполнения радикальной нефрэктомии при клинически локализованном раке почки. Онкоурология 2013;4:14–21. [Matveev V.B., Komarov I.G., Volkova M.I. et al. Safety and usefulness of the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach for performing radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal cancer. Onkourologija = Oncourology 2013;4:14–21. (In Russ.)].

19. Алексеев Б.Я., Калпинский А.С., Нюшко К.М. и др. Анализ непосредственных результатов органосохраняющего лечения у больных раком почки: сравнение лапароскопической резекции почки с резекцией почки открытым способом. Мат-лы VII конгресса РООУ. М., 2012. С. 132– 133. [Alekseev B.J., Kalpinsky A.S., Nyushko K.M. et al. Analysis of the immediate results of organ-preserving treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a comparison of LPN with open partial nephrectomy way. Proceedings of the VII Congress ROOU. M., 2012. Р. 132– 133. (In Russ.)].


Review

For citations:


Alekseeva G.N., Gurina L.I., Mazalov B.V., Filippov A.G., Volkov M.V. Efficiency and safety of organ-sparing surgery for locally advanced kidney cancer. Cancer Urology. 2015;11(1):20-25. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-1-20-25

Views: 1558


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X