Preview

Онкоурология

Расширенный поиск

РОБОТ-АССИСТИРОВАННАЯ РАДИКАЛЬНАЯ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИЯ В ЛЕЧЕНИИ КЛИНИЧЕСКИ ЛОКАЛИЗОВАННОГО РАКА ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ (ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ)

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-3-80-87

Полный текст:

Аннотация

За минувшие 10 лет произошли значительные изменения в хирургическом подходе к лечению локализованного рака предстательной железы — лапароскопическая и в большей степени робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия (РПЭ) стали для многих пациентов предпочтительной альтернативой открытой методике. Однако насколько оправдано стремительное распространение такого дорогостоящего метода, как робот-ассистированная РПЭ? Представленный обзор демонстрирует результаты крупных исследований последних лет, посвященных робот-ассистированной простатэктомии, а также сравнению открытой позадилонной и робот-ассистированной методик РПЭ.

Об авторах

С. Н. Нестеров
ФГБУ НМХЦ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ, Москва
Россия


А. А. Страт
ФГБУ НМХЦ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ, Москва
Россия


Список литературы

1. Bill-Axelson A., Holmberg L., Filén F. et al. Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100(16):1144−54.

2. Boorjian S.A., Karnes R.J., Viterbo R. Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Cancer 2011; 17(13):2883−91.

3. Aus G. Current status of HIFU and cryotherapy in prostate cancer — a review. Eur Urol 2006;50(5):927−34.

4. Hu J.C., Wang Q., Pashos C.L. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostate ectomy. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26(14):2278−84.

5. Djavan B., Eckersberger E., Finkelstein J. et al. Oncologic, functional, and cost analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Suppl 2010; 9(3):371−8.

6. Mottrie A., Ficarra V. Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? The IDEAL Evaluation. Eur Urol 2010;58(4):525−7.

7. Trinh Q.D., Sammon J., Sun M. et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012; 61(4):679−85.

8. Hu J.C., Gu X., Lipsitz S.R. et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009;302(14):1557−64.

9. Lepor H., Nieder A.M., Ferrandino M.N. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1000 cases. J Urol 2001;166(5):1729−33.

10. Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И. Диагностика и лечение локализованного рака предстательной железы. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2008; с. 218.

11. Zincke H., Oesterling J.E., Blute M.L. et al. Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. J Urol 1994; 152:1850−7.

12. Badani K.K., Kaul S., Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 2007;110(9):1951−8.

13. Berryhill R. Jr, Jhaveri J., Yadav R. et al. Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 2008;72(1):15−23.

14. Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55(5):1037−63.

15. Fracalanza S., Ficarra V., Cavalleri S. et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 2008; 101(9):1145−9.

16. Tewari A., Srivasatava A., Menon M. Members of the VIP team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robotassisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003;92(3):205−10.

17. Webster T.M., Herrell S.D., Chang S.S. et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. Urology 2005; 174(3):912−4.

18. Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И., Колонтарев К.Б. Радикальная простатэктомия с роботической ассистенцией: анализ первых 80 случаев. Онкоурология 2010;3:37−42.

19. Lasser M.S., Renzulli J., Turini G.A. et al. Anunbiased prospective report of perioperative ecomplications of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010; 75(5):1083−9.

20. Nelson B., Kaufman M., Broughton G. et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;177(3):929−31.

21. Di Pierro G.B., Baumeister P., Stucki P. et al. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 2011;59(1):1−6.

22. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240(2):205−13.

23. Martin R.C. II, Brennan M.F., Jaques D.P. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002; 235(6):803−13.

24. Donat S.M. Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology 2007;69(2):221−5.

25. Coelho R.F., Palmer K.J., Rocco B. et al. Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 2010; 57(6):945−52.

26. Novara G., Ficarra V., D’Elia C. et al. Prospective evaluation with standardized criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57(3):363−70.

27. Agarwal P.K., Sammon J., Bhandari A. et al. Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur Urol 2011;59(5):684−98.

28. Lowrance W.T., Elkin E.B., Jacks L.M. et al. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. Urology 2010;183(4):1366−72.

29. Krambeck A.E., DiMarco D.S., Rangel L.J. et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robotassisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103(4):448−53.

30. Patel V.R., Palmer K.J., Coughlin G. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol 2008;22(10):2299−305.

31. Murphy D.G., Kerger M., Crowe H. et al. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol 2009;55(6):1358−66.

32. Coelho R.F., Chauhan S., Orvieto M.A. et al. Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57(6):1022−9.

33. Atug F., Castle E.P., Srivastav S.K. et al. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2006; 49(5):866−72.

34. Barocas D.A., Salem S., Kordan Y. et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. Urology 2010; 183(3):990−6.

35. Schroeck F.R., Sun L., Freedland S.J. et al. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 102(1):28−32.

36. Ficarra V., Novara G., Fracalanza S. et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 2009; 104(4):534−9.

37. Williams S.B., Chen M.H., D’Amico A.V. et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Urology 2010;76(5):1097−101.

38. Menon M., Bhandari M., Gupta N. et al. Biochemical recurrence following robotassisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol 2010;58(6):838−46.

39. Eastham J.A., Scardino P.T., Kattan M.W. Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram. Urology 2008;179(6): 2207−11.

40. Menon M., Shrivastava A., Kaul S. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51(3):648−58.

41. Coelho R.F., Rocco B., Patel M.B. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotassisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 2010;24(12):2003−15.

42. Joseph J.V., Rosenbaum R., Madeb R. et al. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. Urology 2006;175(3 Pt 1):945−50.

43. Mottrie A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur Urol 2007;52(3):746−50.

44. Patel V.R., Thaly R., Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 2007;99(5):1109−12.

45. Joseph J.V., Leonhardt A., Hitendra R. et al. The cost of radical prostatectomy: retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches. J Robotic Surg 2008;2(1):21−4.

46. Joseph J.V., Leonhardt A., Erturk E. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: is this a cost-viable option? J Endourol 2005;19 (Suppl 1).

47. Patel H.R., Linares A., Joseph J.V. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. Surg Oncol 2009;18(3):242−6.

48. Burgess S.V., Atug F., Castle E.P. et al. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2006; 20(10):827−30.

49. Hohwü L., Akre O., Pedersen K.V. et al. Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a comparison of length of sick leave. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009;43(4):259−64.

50. Lotan Y., Cadeddu J.A., Gettman M.T. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. Urology 2004; 172(4 Pt 1):1431−5.


Для цитирования:


Нестеров С.Н., Страт А.А. РОБОТ-АССИСТИРОВАННАЯ РАДИКАЛЬНАЯ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИЯ В ЛЕЧЕНИИ КЛИНИЧЕСКИ ЛОКАЛИЗОВАННОГО РАКА ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ (ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ). Онкоурология. 2012;8(3):80-87. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-3-80-87

For citation:


Nesterov S.N., Strat A.A. ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER (A REVIEW OF LITERATURE). Cancer Urology. 2012;8(3):80-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-3-80-87

Просмотров: 381


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)