CYSTECTOMY WITH THE PROSTATE AND SEMINAL VESICLES BEING PRESERVED: PROGNOSIS AND REALITY
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2009-5-2-52-55
Abstract
The results of cystectomy (CE) in bladder cancer, performed in the standard and modified modes, were compared. The case histories of 153 patients operated on, by completely or partially preserving the prostate, were analyzed. With the extent ≤ T2N0, the rates of local and distant dissemination after standard and modified CE was 4%/2.1% and 9.5%/10.9%, respectively; i.e. the values did not differ greatly. The data of the performed analysis suggest that the compared values after modified CE are not worse than those after standard CE with orthotopic cystoplasty and do not allow one to doubt the oncological appropriateness in reducing the volume of an operation in specially selected patients.
About the Authors
D. T. Gotsadze
Department of Urology, A.R. Gvamichava Cancer Research Center, Tbilisi
Georgia
Georgia
V. T. Chakvetadze
Department of Urology, A.R. Gvamichava Cancer Research Center, Tbilisi
Georgia
Georgia
References
1. Гоцадзе Д.Т., Чакветадзе В.Т., Данелия Э.В. Цистэктомия с сохранением предстательной железы и семенных пузырьков. Онкоурология 2006;(1): 29—34.
2. Hautmann R.E., Gschwend J.E., de Petriconi R.C. et al. Cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: results of a surgery only series in the neobladder era. J Urol 2006;176(2):486— 92; discussion 491—2.
3. Hautmann R.E., Stein J.P. Neobladder with prostatic capsule and seminal-sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer: a step in the wrong direction. Urol Clin North Am 2005;32(2):177—85.
4. Muto G., Bardari F., D'Urso L., Giona C. Seminal sparing cystectomy and ileocapsu- loplasty: long-term followup results. J Urol 2004;172(1):76—80.
5. Terrone C., Cracco C., Scarpa R.M., Rossetti S.R. Supra-ampullar cystectomy with preservation of sexual function and ileal orthotopic reservoir for bladder tumor: twenty years of experience. Eur Urol 2004;46(2):264—9; discussion 269—70.
6. Martis G., D'Elia G., Diana M. et al. Prostatic capsule- and nerve-sparing cys- tectomy in organ-confined bladder cancer: preliminary results. World J Surg 2005;29(10):1277—81.
7. Puppo P., Introini C., Bertolotto F., Naselli A. Potency preserving cystectomy with intrafascial prostatectomy for high risk superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 2008;179(5):1727—32; discussion 1732.
8. Rozet F., Lesur G., Cathelineau X. et al. Oncological evaluation of prostate sparing cystectomy: the Montsouris long-term results. J Urol 2008;179(6):2170—4; dis- cussion 2174—5.
9. Colombo R., Bertini R., Salonia A. et al. Overall clinical outcomes after nerve and seminal sparing radical cystectomy for the treatment of organ confined bladder cancer. J Urol 2004;171(5):1829.
10. Botto H., Sebe P., Molinie V. et al. Prostatic capsule- and seminal-sparing cystectomy for bladder carcinoma: initial results for selected patients. BJU Int 2004;94(7):1021—5.
11. Brausi M., Gavioli M., Viola M. et al. Radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder with prostate and seminal sparing in young patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of bladder. Eur Urol Suppl 2004;4(4):61—6.
12. Zhou F.J., Qin Z.K., Han H. et al. Radical cystectomy with sparing partial prostate for invasive bladder cancer. Ai Zheng 2003;22(10):1066—9.
13. Simone G., Papalia R., Leonardo C. et al. Prostatic capsule and seminal vesicle- sparing cystectomy: improved functional results, inferior oncologic outcome. Urology 2008;72(1):162—6.
Review
For citations:
Gotsadze D.T., Chakvetadze V.T. CYSTECTOMY WITH THE PROSTATE AND SEMINAL VESICLES BEING PRESERVED: PROGNOSIS AND REALITY. Cancer Urology. 2009;5(2):52-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2009-5-2-52-55
Views:
809
Email this article 