Predictors of survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after surgical treatment
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2025-21-1-60-70
Abstract
Background. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for only 5–10 % of all urothelial cancer sites. Radical nephroureterectomy is the main treatment method in patients without distant metastases.
Aim. To study survival and assess the impact of preand postoperative clinical and pathomorphological factors on the risk of death in patients with UTUC after surgical treatment.
Materials and methods. The results of surgical treatment of 157 patients with UTUC over a ten-year period were analyzed. Radical nephroureterectomy was performed in 151 (96.1 %) patients. Organ-preserving treatment was used in 6 (5.9 %) cases. Smoking was registered in 64 (40.8 %) patients. Obesity was observed in 40 (36.4 %) of 110 (70.1 %) patients available for analysis. Overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), progression-free (PFS), and recurrence-free survival rates were estimated. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of clinical and pathomorphological factors on the risk of patient death.
Results. The 5-year OS, CSS, and PFS were 67.9, 76.5, and 74.2 %, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 73.4 %. The 5-year OS in the obese group was 72.7 % versus 56.5 % in the non-obese group (p = 0.042). In obese patients, there was statistically significant predominance of women (p = 0.001), significantly lower proportion of patients with regional lymph node involvement (p = 0.041), and a significantly lower number of smoking patients (p = 0.049). According to multivariate regression analysis, the risk of death was significantly increased in patients with Charlson comorbidity index above 5 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.34; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.33–4.11; p <0.001) and regional lymph node involvement (HR 2.78; 95 % CI 1.36–5.70; p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that development of non-muscle invasive recurrence in the bladder decreased the risk of death after surgical treatment (HR 0.23; 95 % CI 0.08–0.61; p = 0.003).
Conclusion. Such factors as advancement of the primary tumor and initial somatic status of the patient have negative impact on the risk of patient death after surgical treatment of UTUC. Patients with obesity have better OS, CSS, PFS, are significantly more often female, significantly rarer have regional lymph node involvement and smoke. Development of non-muscle invasive recurrence in the bladder significantly reduces the risk of patient death.
About the Authors
A. S. OrlovRussian Federation
Alexander Sergeevich Orlov
29 Soboleva St., Ekaterinburg 620036
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. O. Mager
Russian Federation
29 Soboleva St., Ekaterinburg 620036
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. P. Shcheglova
Russian Federation
29 Soboleva St., Ekaterinburg 620036
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. A. Kovalenko
Russian Federation
29 Soboleva St., Ekaterinburg 620036
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. A. Sorochkin
Russian Federation
29 Soboleva St., Ekaterinburg 620036
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
S. E. Ivanov
Russian Federation
29 Soboleva St., Ekaterinburg 620036
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Siegel R., Miller K., Fuchs H. et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71(1):7–33. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21654
2. Joshi S., Quast L., Chang S. et al. Effects of tumor size and location on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy. Indian J Urol 2018;34(1):68–73. DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_216_17
3. DominguezEscrig J.L., Peyronnet B., Seisen T. et al. Potential benefit of lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review by the European association of urology guidelines panel on non muscleinvasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2019;5(2):224–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.09.015
4. Ehdaie B., Chromecki T., Lee R. et al. Obesity adversely impacts disease specific outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 2011;186(1):66–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.031
5. Rink M., Xylinas E., Margulis V. et al. Impact of smoking on oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. Eur Urol 2013;63(6):1082–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.029
6. Shigeta K., Kikuchi E., Abe T. et al. A novel riskbased approach simulating oncological surveillance after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2020;3(6):756–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.021
7. Lwin A., Hsu C., Chipollini J. et al. Urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter: does location make a difference? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020;18(1):45–9.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.10.023
8. Brusselaers N., Lagergren J. The Charlson comorbidity index in registrybased research. Methods Inf Med 2017;56(5):401–6. DOI: 10.3414/ME17010051
9. Brierley J., Gospodarowicz M., Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 8th edition. WileyBlackwell, December 2016.
10. Soukup V., Capoun O., Cohen D. et al. Prognostic performance and reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization grading classification systems in nonmuscleinvasive bladder cancer: a European Association of Urology Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel systematic review. Eur Urol 2017;72(5):801–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.015
11. Simsir A., Sarsik B., Cureklibatir I. et al. Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: stage, grade, and smoking status. Int Urol Nephrol 2011;43(4):1039–45. DOI: 10.1007/s112550119915z
12. Rink M., Xylinas M., Trinh Q. et al. Genderspecific effect of smoking on upper tract urothelial carcinoma outcomes. BJU Int 2013;112(5):623–37. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12014
13. Osch F., Jochems S., Schooten F. et al. Significant role of lifetime cigarette smoking in worsening bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial carcinoma prognosis: a metaanalysis. J Urol 2016; 195(4 Pt 1):872–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.139
14. Miyazaki J., Nishiyama H., Fujimoto H. et al. Impact of smoking on the age at diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: subanalysis of the Japanese urological association multiinstitutional national database. Int J Urol 2015;22(11):1023–7. DOI: 10.1111/iju.12886
15. Xylinas E., Kluth L., Rieken M. et al. Impact of smoking status and cumulative exposure on intravesical recurrence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. BJU Int 2014;114(1):56–61. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12400
16. Hagiwara M., Kikuchi E., Tanaka N. et al. Impact of smoking status on bladder tumor recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 2013;189(6):2062–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.024
17. Dabi Y., Mrini M., Duquesnes I. et al. Impact of body mass index on the oncological outcomes of patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2018;36(1):65–71. DOI: 10.1007/s0034501720954
18. Kim H., Jeong C., Kwak C. et al. Can body mass index predict survival outcomes in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for uppertract urothelial carcinoma? Int Urol Nephrol 2015;47(8):1311–20. DOI: 10.1007/s1125501510394
19. Liu J., Li Y., Liu Z. et al. Influence of body mass index on oncological outcomes in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Urol 2014;21(2):136–42. DOI: 10.1111/iju.12208
20. Yeh H., Li C., Chien T. et al. Interethnic differences in the impact of body mass index on upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2021;39(2):491–500. DOI: 10.1007/s00345020032040
21. Орлов А.С., Магер В.О., Щеглова В.П. и др. Влияние немы шечноинвазивного рецидива уротелиального рака верхних мочевых путей на выживаемость пациентов после радикаль ной нефруретерэктомии. Уральский медицинский журнал 2024;23(4):104–15. DOI: 10.52420/umj.23.4.104
Review
For citations:
Orlov A.S., Mager V.O., Shcheglova V.P., Kovalenko D.A., Sorochkin D.A., Ivanov S.E. Predictors of survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after surgical treatment. Cancer Urology. 2025;21(1):60-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2025-21-1-60-70