PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF MOLECULAR GENETIC MARKERS IN KIDNEY CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING TARGETED THERAPY
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2011-7-4-24-31
Abstract
Objective: to study the prognostic value of alterations in the VHL gene and the plasma markers hVEGF, hVEGFR2, and hVEGFR3 in patients with metastatic kidney cancer (KC) who receive targeted therapy.
Subjects and methods. Paraffin blocks from 22 patients with metastatic KC who received targeted therapy were analyzed for VHL gene mutation/methylation. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were sequenced using a BigDye® Terminator v 3.1, a Cycle Sequencing Kit, and an ABI3100 genetic analyzer in accordance with the Applied Biosystems protocols. VHL gene methylation was determined by methyl-sensitive PCR. The markers hVEGF, hVEGFR2, and hVEGFR3 were measured in the plasma of 43 patients before, during, and after targeted therapy, by applying the commercial DuoSet® ELISA kits (RnDSystems, USA). The results obtained were analyzed by known statistical methods, by using the package of statistical programs SPSS 13.0 for Windows. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival differences were found by the log-rank test in the patient groups. Cox uni- and multi-factorial regression analyses were used to identify factors that were prognostically significant for survival.
Results. Out of 22 patients, 10 (45.5 %) and 1 (4.5 %) were found to have VHL gene mutations or methylation, respectively. VHL gene inactivation did not affect prognosis in patients and the results of antiangiogenic therapy. Correlation analysis revealed no relationship between the concentrations of hVEGF and hVEGFR2 before and during therapy or absolute increases in hVEGF and hVEGFR2 concentrations during treatment with the frequency of progression during targeted therapy, with progression-free survival, and total life expectancy. No correlation was either found between the hVEGFR3 concentration and its changes and the results of antiangiogenic therapy. There was an inverse correlation between the pretreatment plasma hVEGFR3 level and lifetime without progression during antiangiogenic therapy (r = – 0.477, p = 0.039).
Conclusion. VHL gene alterations and plasma hVEGF and hVEGFR2 levels are not predictors of a response to antiangiogenic therapy. The pretreatment plasma hVEGFR3 level correlates with progression-free survival in KC patients receiving targeted therapy.
About the Authors
M. V. PetersRussian Federation
V. E. Shevchenko
Russian Federation
V. B. Matveev
Russian Federation
M. I. Volkova
Russian Federation
S. A. Kalinin
Russian Federation
D. M. Mikhailenko
Russian Federation
D. V. Zaletayev
Russian Federation
References
1. Wood C.G. Multimodal Approaches in the Management of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Combining Surgery and Systemic Therapies to Improve Patient Outcome. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13(Suppl 2):697−702.
2. Херрингтон С., Макги Дж. Молекулярная клиническая диагностика. Пер. с англ. М.: Мир,1999. 558 с.
3. Hansel D.E., Rini B.I. Molecular genetics of hereditary renal cancer: new genes and diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities. Expert Reviews in Anticancer Therapy 2008; 8:895−905.
4. Linehan W.M., Walther M.M., Zbar B. The genetic basis of cancer of the kidney. J Urol 2003; 170:2163−72.
5. Linehan W.M., Zbar B., Klausner R.D. The genetic basis of human cancer, chapter 27 (Renal carcinoma). 2nd ed. USA.: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002.
6. Smits K.M., Schouten L.J., Dijk B.A. et al. Genetic and epigenetic alterations in the von Hippel-Lindau gene: the influence on renal cancer prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:782−7.
7. Gallou C., Joly D., Mejean A. et al. Mutations of the VHL gene in sporadic renal cell carcinoma: definition of a risk factor for VHL patients to develop an RCC. Hum Mutat 1999; 13: 464–75.
8. Choueiri T.K., Vaziri S.A.J., Jaeger E. et al. von Hippel-Lindau gene status and response to vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2008;180(3):860−5.
9. Rini B.I., Jaeger E., Weinberg V. et al. Clinical response to therapy targeted at vascular endothelial growth factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: impact of patient characteristics and Von Hippel-Lindau gene status. BJU International. 2006 Oct 1; 98(4):756−62.
10. Hutson T., Davis I.D., Macheils J.H. et al. Biomarker analysis and final efficacy and safety results of a phase II renal cell carcinoma trial with pazopanib (GW786034), a multi-kinase angiogenesis inhibitor. J Clin Oncol 2008;26.
11. Kim J.H., Jung C.W., Cho Y.H. et al. Somatic VHL alteration and its impact on prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2005;13: 859−64.
12. Van Houwelingen K.P., van Dijk B.A., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C.A. et al. Prevalence of von Hippel-Lindau gene mutations in sporadic renal cell carcinoma: results fromTheNetherlands Cohort Study. BMCCancer 2005;5:57.
13. Ferrara N., Gerber H.P., Le Couter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 2003; 9(6):669−76.
14. Rioux-Leclercq N., Fergelot P., Zerrouki S. et al. Plasma level and tissue expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 50 cases. Hum Pathol 2007;38(10):1489−95.
15. Jacobsen J., Rasmuson T., Grankvist K., Ljungberg B. Vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2000;163(1):343−7.
16. Klatte T., Böhm M., Nelius T. et al. Evaluation of peri-operative peripheral and renal venous levels of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors and their relevance in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BJU International. 2007;100(1):209−14.
17. Negrier S., Perol D., Menetrier-Caux C. et al. Interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and vascular endothelial growth factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: prognostic value of interleukin-6−from the Groupe Francais d’Immunotherapie. J Clin Oncol 2004 Jun 15; 22(12):2371−8.
18. Alamdari F.I., Rasmuson T., Grankvist K., Ljungberg B. Angiogenesis and other markers for prediction of survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology 2007;41(1):5−9.
19. Schips L., Dalpiaz O., Lipsky K. et al. Serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and endostatin in renal cell carcinoma patients compared to a control group. Eur Urol 2007;51(1):168−73.
20. Deprimo S.E., Bello C.L., Smeraglia J. et al. Circulating protein biomarkers of pharmacodynamic activity of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: modulation of VEGF and VEGF-related proteins. J Transl Med 2007;5:32.
21. Rini B.I., Michaelson M.D., Rosenberg J.E. et al. Antitumor activity and biomarker analysis of sunitinib in patients with bevacizumab-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(22):3743−8.
22. Escudier B., Eisen T., Stadler WM. et al. Sorafenib for treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Final efficacy and safety results of the phase III treatment approaches in renal cancer global evaluation trial. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(20):3312−8.
Review
For citations:
Peters M.V., Shevchenko V.E., Matveev V.B., Volkova M.I., Kalinin S.A., Mikhailenko D.M., Zaletayev D.V. PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF MOLECULAR GENETIC MARKERS IN KIDNEY CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING TARGETED THERAPY. Cancer Urology. 2011;7(4):24-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2011-7-4-24-31