Clinical case of primary transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff implantation
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-1-134-139
Abstract
Among surgical methods of treatment of male stress urinary incontinence, implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter is the leading technique. Despite its acceptable effectiveness, the intervention carries a risk of complications, some of which require removal of a component or the entire device.
The article presents a clinical case of primary artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement and literature review on this topic.
About the Authors
A. A. Tomilov
Moscow Urological Center, S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Tomilov.
5 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284; Build. 1, 2/1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993
Competing Interests:
None
E. I. Veliev
Moscow Urological Center, S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
5 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284; Build. 1, 2/1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993
Competing Interests:
None
E. N. Golubtsova
Moscow Urological Center, S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
5 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284; Build. 1, 2/1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993
Competing Interests:
None
References
1. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan March 2023.
2. Corrales-Acosta E., Corrales M., Arenas-Aquino A.E. et al. Artificial urinary sphincter outcomes for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence. A narrative review. Rev Mex Urol 2022;81(6):1–13. DOI: 10.48193/revistamexicanadeurologa.v81i6.826
3. Guralnick M.L., Miller E., Toh K.L., Webster G.D. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol 2002;167(5):2075–8.
4. Incontinence. Eds.: P. Abrams, L. Cardozo, A. Wagg, A. Wein. 6th edn. ICI-ICS. International Continence Society, Bristol UK, 2017. 2619 p.
5. Schillebeeckx C., Deruyver Y., Beels E. et al. Long-term functional outcomes and patient satisfaction of artificial urinary sphincter implantation for male non-neurogenic incontinence: a retrospective study of 30-year experience in a tertiary centre. Paper presented at: 2021 International Continence Society Annual Meeting; October 14–17, 2021; virtual. Available at: https://www.ics.org/2021/abstract/4.
6. Veliev E.I., Tomilov A.A. Modern possibilities for diagnosing and treating urinary incontinence in men. M.: AO “Vidal Rus”, 2020. 80 p. (In Russ.).
7. Ortiz N.M., Wolfe A.R., Baumgarten A.S. et al. Artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion heat map shows similar anatomical characteristics for transcorporal and standard approach. J Urol 2020;204(5):1027–32. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001148
8. Veliev E.I., Tomilov A.A., Golubtsova E.N. Long-term efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800ТМ implantations. Vestnik urologii = Urology Herald 2021;9(1):14–21. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-1-14-21
9. Veliev E.I., Golubtsova E.N., Tomilov A.A. Possibilities of surgical treatment of patients with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Onkokhirurgiya = Oncosurgery 2014;(1):17–21. (In Russ.).
10. Diao L., Nealon S.W., Carpinito G.P. et al. Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion. Int Braz J Urol 2022;48(4):679–85. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0089
11. Hughes M., Caza T., Li G. et al. Histologic characterization of the post-radiation urethral stenosis in men treated for prostate cancer. World J Urol 2020;38(9):2269–77. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03031-y
12. Redmond E., Tong S., Zemp L. et al. Improved artificial urinary sphincter outcomes using a transcorporal cuff placement in patients with a “fragile urethra”. Can Urol Assoc J 2020;14(12):E621–4. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6431
13. Mann R.A., Kasabwala K., Buckley J.C. et al. The “fragile” urethra as a predictor of early artificial urinary sphincter erosion. Urology 2022;169:233–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.023
14. Hoy N.Y., Rourke K.F. Artificial urinary sphincter outcomes in the “fragile urethra”. Urology 2015;86(3):618–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.023
15. El-Akri M., Bentellis I., Tricard T. et al. Transcorporal vs. bulbar artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients with fragile urethra. World J Urol 2021;39(12):4449–57. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03783-6
16. Lee D., Zafirakis H., Shapiro A. et al. Intermediate outcomes after transcorporal placement of an artificial urinary sphincter. Int J Urol 2012;19(9):861–6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03034.x
17. Wiedemann L., Cornu J.N., Haab E. et al. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter implantation as a salvage surgical procedure for challenging cases of male stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and functional outcomes in a contemporary series. BJU Int 2013;112(8):1163–8. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12386
18. Smith P.J., Hudak S.J., Scott J.F. et al. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with a higher risk of postoperative urinary retention. Can J Urol 2013;20(3):6773–7.
19. Zheng D.C., Xie M.K., Bao J.W. et al. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in a case requiring revision for urethral atrophy. J Vis Exp 2022;(184). DOI: 10.3791/63678
20. Hernández-Hernández D., Ortega-González M.Y., Padilla-Fernández B., Castro-Díaz D.M. Artificial urinary sphincter in a high-risk urethra: transcorporal gullwing modification description of the technique. Turk J Urol 2022;48(6):460–4. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2022.22134
Review
For citations:
Tomilov A.A., Veliev E.I., Golubtsova E.N. Clinical case of primary transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff implantation. Cancer Urology. 2024;20(1):134-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-1-134-139
Views:
217
Email this article 