Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

Nephrometry scoring systems RENAL, PADUA, C-index, SPARE, and ZONAL NePhRO for prediction of partial nephrectomy outcomes

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-1-15-23

Abstract

Background. Modern imaging methods make it possible to detect kidney tumors at early stages which, along with active development of laparoscopic technologies, has led to an increase in the number of nephron-sparing surgeries and their effectiveness. The RENAL, PADUA, C-index, ZONAL NePhRO, and SPARE nephrometry score systems are actively used to predict outcomes of partial nephrectomy.

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of nephrometry scores in predicting the results of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Materials and methods. The data on 90 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy at the Urology Center of the Mariinsky Hospital from September 2021 to May 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. There were 43 men (47.8 %) and 47 women (52.2 %). The median age of patients was 61 years (interquartile range (IQR) 48–69). Tumor of the left kidney was diagnosed in 46 (51.1 %) patients, and tumor of the right kidney in 44 (48.9 %) patients.

Results. Mean operative time was 132 ± 39 minutes. Median warm ischemia time and intraoperative blood loss were 15 minutes (IQR 12–20 min) and 150 mL (IQR 70–257.5), respectively. Mean hemoglobin level and red blood cell count before surgery were 132 ± 15 g/L and 4.6 ± 0.63 × 1012/L, respectively. After the surgery, the mean values were 119 ± 16 g/L and 4.06 ± 0.6 × 1012/L, respectively. Median creatinine and mean glomerular filtration rate before surgery were 83.5 µmol/L (IQR 72–97 µmol/L) and 76.9 ± 21 mL/min, respectively; in the early postoperative period, 83 µmol/L (IQR 70–100 µmol/L) and 76.4 ± 24 mL/min, respectively. The strongest relationship was established between the RENAL and PADUA scores (r = 0.907; p <0.001), a slightly weaker relationship was found for the PADUA and SPARE scores, as well as PADUA and C-index (r = 0.856; p <0.001 and r = –0.785; p <0.001, respectively). The RENAL score showed high predictive value in assessing the volume of intraoperative blood loss and operative time (r = 0.881; p = 0.001 and r = 0.854; p <0.001, respectively). The PADUA scale demonstrated high predictive efficiency for warm ischemia time (r = 0.775; p = 0.001). C-index significantly predicted the volume of intraoperative blood loss and operative time (r = –0.807; p <0.001 and r = –0.797; p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion. All of the above nephrometry scores showed high predictive efficiency, but the RENAL and PADUA scores were the most valuable.

About the Authors

B. G. Guliev
Urology Center with Robot-Assisted Surgery, Mariinsky Hospital
Russian Federation

Bakhman G. Guliev.

56 Liteynyy Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 191014


Competing Interests:

None



I. A. Povago
Urology Center with Robot-Assisted Surgery, Mariinsky Hospital
Russian Federation

56 Liteynyy Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 191014


Competing Interests:

None



References

1. Phelan M.W., Perry K.T., Gore J. et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery. Curr Urol Rep 2003;4(1):13–20. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-003-0052-9

2. Wunderlich H., Reichelt O., Schubert R. et al. Preoperative simulation of partial nephrectomy with three-dimensional computed tomography. BJU Int 2000;86(7):777–81. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00898.x

3. Zhang Y., Long G., Shang H. et al. Comparison of the oncological, perioperative and functional outcomes of partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies. Asian J Urol 2021;8(1):117–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.11.004

4. Guliev B.G., Komyakov B.K., Yagubov Kh.Zh. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with selective ischemia. Urologiia = Urology 2022;(1):55–60. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2022.1.55-60

5. Campos-Sañudo J.A., Ballestero-Diego R., Zubillaga-Guerrero S. et al. Impact of radical nephrectomy on kidney function and prognostic factors for adverse cardiovascular events. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) 2020;44(4):239–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.02.003

6. Klatte T., Ficarra V., Gratzke C. et al. A Literature review of renal surgical anatomy and surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2015;68(6):980–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.010

7. Kutikov A., Uzzo R.G. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182(3):844–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035

8. Ficarra V., Novara G., Secco S. et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009;56(5):786–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.040

9. Simmons M.N., Ching C.B., Samplaski M.K. et al. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method. J Urol 2010;183(5):1708–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.005

10. Ficarra V., Porpiglia F., Crestani A. et al. The Simplified PADUA REnal (SPARE) nephrometry system: a novel classification of parenchymal renal tumours suitable for partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2019;124(4):621–8. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14772

11. Hakky T.S., Baumgarten A.S., Allen B. et al. Zonal NePhRO scoring system: a superior renal tumor complexity classification model. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2014;12(1):13–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2013.07.009

12. Zhang Z.Y., Tang Q., Li X.S. et al. Clinical analysis of the PADUA and the RENAL scoring systems for renal neoplasms: a retrospective study of 245 patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2014;21(1):40–4. DOI: 10.1111/iju.12192

13. Karamık K., İslamoğlu E., Erdemir A.G. et al. The associations of RENAL, PADUA and C-index nephrometry scores with perioperative outcomes and postoperative renal function in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Turk J Urol 2021;47(1):14–21. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20247

14. Alvim R.G., Audenet F., Vertosick E.A. et al. Performance prediction for surgical outcomes in partial nephrectomy using nephrometry scores: a comparison of Arterial Based Complexity (ABC), RENAL and PADUA systems. Eur Urol Oncol 2018;1(5):428–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.05.004

15. Wang Y.D., Huang C.P., Chang C.H. et al. The role of RENAL, PADUA, C-index, CSA nephrometry systems in predicting ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy. BMC Urol 2019;19(1):72. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0504-2

16. Maxwell A.W.P., Baird G.L., Iannuccilli J.D. et al. Renal cell carcinoma: comparison of RENAL nephrometry and PADUA scores with maximum tumor diameter for prediction of local recurrence after thermal ablation. Radiology 2017;283(2):590–7. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016161225

17. Karamık K., Aktaş Y., Erdemir A.G. et al. Predicting strict trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: comparison of RENAL, PADUA, and C-Index Scores. J Kidney Cancer VHL2021;8(4):1–12. DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v8i4.183


Review

For citations:


Guliev B.G., Povago I.A. Nephrometry scoring systems RENAL, PADUA, C-index, SPARE, and ZONAL NePhRO for prediction of partial nephrectomy outcomes. Cancer Urology. 2024;20(1):15-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-1-15-23

Views: 669


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X