Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

Stent-ception: implementation of soft double-J stents in the ureteric Memokath-051TM in bilateral ureteric stricture post radiotherapy for advanced prostate cancer

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2023-19-3-100-103

Abstract

Narrowing of ureter can be due to malignant or benign causes. Temporary double-J (DJ) stents, various metallic stent designs, or definitive corrective surgery can be the options management for ureteric stricture. As an alternative from DJ stents, Memokath-051TM (MMK-051TM) can be inserted in strictured ureters post radiotherapy for advanced prostate cancer patients. We present a case of an advanced prostate cancer which bilateral DJ Stents placed within MMK-051TM. A 76-year-old man with underlying hormone sensitive advanced prostate cancer completed radiotherapy. Post radiotherapy he developed bilateral ureteric strictures  and bilateral DJ stents  inserted.  He had to underwent multiple change of stents due to blockage. Patient had MMK-051TM inserted, however complicated with blockage due to encrustation. Improvisation method done by putting the bilateral DJ stents within the MMK-051TM. Patient had no more blockage of MMK-051TM after the placement of DJ stents within it. However, patient succumbed to death a year after the last procedure. Our case report highlighted encrustation of metallic ureteric stents and a novel approach to overcome this problem. Introduction  of additional DJ stents  not only reduced the incidence of MMK-051TM blockage but also improved the quality of life of the patient.

About the Authors

M. F. Mohd Isa
Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia; Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
Malaysia

Mohd Firdaus Bin Mohd Isa.

Kubang Kerian, Kelantan


Competing Interests:

None



M. D. Mohamed Ashraf
Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia; Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
Malaysia

Mohamed Ashraf Bin Mohamed Daud

Kubang Kerian, Kelantan


Competing Interests:

None



M. R. Yusof
Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia; Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia; Hospital Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Universiti PUTRA Malaysia
Malaysia

Mohd Razaleigh Bin Yusof.

Kubang Kerian, Kelantan; Serdang, Selangor


Competing Interests:

None



N. G. Faiz
Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia; Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia; Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
Malaysia

Ahmad Faiz Najmuddin Bin Mohd Ghazi.

Kubang Kerian, Kelantan


Competing Interests:

None



S.R. H.I. Merican
Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia; Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
Malaysia

Siti Rahmah Binti Hashim Isa Merican.

Kubang Kerian, Kelantan


Competing Interests:

None



References

1. Elliott S.P., Malaeb B.S. Long-term urinary adverse effects of pelvic radiotherapy. World J Urol 2011;29(1):35–41. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0603-x

2. Keyes M., Miller S., Pickles T. et al. Late urinary side effects 10 years after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: population-based results from a multiphysician practice treating with a standardized protocol and uniform dosimetric goal. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;90(3):570–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.037

3. Jarosek S.L., Virnig B.A., Chu H., Elliott S.P. Propensity-weighted long-term risk of urinary adverse events after prostate cancer surgery, radiation, or both. Eur Urol 2014;67(2):273–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.061

4. Joshi H.B., Stainthorpe A., MacDonagh R.P. et al. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol 2003;169(3):1065–9. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000048980.33855.90

5. Staios D., Shergill I., Thwaini A. et al. The Memokath stent. Expert Rev Med Devices 2007;4(2):99–101. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.4.2.99

6. Richter S., Ringel A., Shalev M. The indwelling ureteric stent: A “friendly” procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int 2000;85(4):408–11. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00543.x-i1

7. Maan Z., Patel D., Moraitis K. et al. Comparison of stent-related symptoms between conventional Double-J stents and a new-generation thermoexpandable segmental metallic stent: a validated-questionnaire-based study. J Endourol 2010;24(4):589–93. DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0318

8. Zaman F., Poullis C., Bach C. et al. Use of a segmental thermoexpandable metal alloy stent in the management of malignant ureteric obstruction: a single centre experience in the UK. Urol Int 2011; 87(4):405–10. DOI: 10.1159/000326081

9. Papadopoulos G.I., Middela S., Srirangam S.J. et al. Use of memokath 051 metallic stent in the management of ureteral strictures: a single-center experience. Urol Int 2010;84(3):286–91. DOI: 10.1159/000288230

10. Singh I., Gupta N.P., Hemal A.K. et al. Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors. Urology 2001;58(4):526–31. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01317-6

11. Semins M.J,. Matlaga B.R. Management of urolithiasis in pregnancy. Int J Womens Health 2013;5:599–604. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S51416


Review

For citations:


Mohd Isa M.F., Mohamed Ashraf M.D., Yusof M.R., Faiz N.G., Merican S.H. Stent-ception: implementation of soft double-J stents in the ureteric Memokath-051TM in bilateral ureteric stricture post radiotherapy for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Urology. 2023;19(3):100-103. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2023-19-3-100-103

Views: 260


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X