Laparoscopic single port radical nephrectomy challenges: a case presentation
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-2-168-171
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma accounts 2 % of global cancer diagnoses and death. In Malaysia, its occurrence is found in 1.9 in 100,000 patients and more predominantly in male with ratio male to female of 2.75:1 in 2006. Radical nephrectomy has been proven to give the best chance of cure and long term survival. Throughout the years, conventional open surgery has evolved to single port laparoscopic surgery. It has its own advantages, difficulties and cases selections criteria. We report a successful case of Laparoscopic single port surgery in a renal cell carcinoma patient with underlying prostate carcinoma.
About the Authors
M. R. YusofMalaysia
Mohd Razaleigh Yusof.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. P. Arunasalam
Malaysia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
M. Z. Saiful Azli
Malaysia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
C. K.S. Lee
Malaysia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
O. Fahmy
Malaysia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
M. G. Khairul-Asri
Malaysia
Khairul-Asri Mohd Ghani.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Padala S.A., Barsouk A., Thandra K.C. et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. World J Oncol 2020;11(3):79-87. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1279.
2. Singam P., Ho C., Hong G.E. et al. Clinical characteristics of renal cancer in Malaysia: a ten year review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010;11(2):503-6.
3. Yusof M.R., Hashim M.N., Mokhter W.M.W. et al. Renal cell carcinoma with IVC thrombosis: modalities and surgical approach - a case report. Surg Chron 2018;23(2):120-3.
4. Clayman R.V., Kavoussi L.R., Soper N.J. et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1991;146(2):278-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37770-4.
5. Raman J.D., Bensalah K., Bagrodia A. et al. Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology 2007;70(6):1039-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.001.
6. Raman J.D., Bagrodia A., Cadeddu J.A. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 2009;55(5): 1198-204.
7. Matsumoto K., Miyajima A., Fukumoto K. et al. Factors influencing the operating time for singleport laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: focus on the anatomy and distribution of the renal artery and vein. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017;47(10):976-80. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx105.
8. Kurien A., Rajapurkar S., Sinha L. et al. First prize: standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a randomized comparative study. J Endourol 2010;25(3):365-70. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0250.
Review
For citations:
Yusof M.R., Arunasalam A.P., Saiful Azli M.Z., Lee C.K., Fahmy O., Khairul-Asri M.G. Laparoscopic single port radical nephrectomy challenges: a case presentation. Cancer Urology. 2021;17(2):168-171. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-2-168-171