MINI-INVASIVE TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER PROSTATE CANCER RADICAL TREATMENT
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2013-9-4-37-42
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate transobturator retrobulbar sling (TRS) implantation midterm results for stress urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy.
Subjects and methods. From April 2008 to December 2012 thirteen TRS implantations were performed in Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology of Russian Medical Academy Postgraduate Education in men with mild to severe stress UI. Preoperative assessment, including urethrocystoscopy, was performed. The use of only one safety pad per day was considered to be recovery. The application of no more than 2 pads or a more than 50 % urine leakage reduction was regarded as improvement.
Results. An average follow-up of 33±19 months indicated recovery in 11 of the 13 patients, 1 patient had improvement, and 1 patient showed no positive result. In addition to urine loss reduction, there was significant quality of life improvement. No complications requiring sling removal were seen.
Conclusion. TRS implantation is an effective and safe treatment option for selected patients with stress UI after radical prostatectomy, leading to significantly quality of life improvement.
About the Authors
E. I. Veliyev
Russian Medical Academy Postgraduate Education, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology
E. N. Golubtsova
Russian Medical Academy Postgraduate Education, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology
A. A. Tomilov
Russian Medical Academy Postgraduate Education, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology
References
1. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2011 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. В. И. Чиссова, В. В. Старинского, Г. В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена, 2013. 289 с.
2. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2011 году. Под ред. В. И. Чиссова, В. В. Старинского, Г. В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена, 2012. 240 с.
3. Велиев Е. И., Петров С. Б. Практическая онкоурология: избранные лекции. Под ред. А. В. Воробьева, С. А. Тюляндина, В. М. Моисеенко. СПб.: Изд. Центр ТОММ, 2008. 368 с.
4. Велиев Е. И., Голубцова Е. Н., Котов С. В. Особенности восстановления функции удержания мочи после нервосберегающей радикальной простатэктомии. Леч дело 2011;2:87–93.
5. Ficarra V., Novara G., Rosen R. C. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62 (3):405–17.
6. Thuroff J. W., Abrams P., Andersson K. E. et al. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2011;59:387–400.
7. Shipley W. U., Zietman A. L., Hanks G. E. et al. Treatment related sequelae following external beam radiation for prostate cancer: a review with an update in patients with stages T1 and T2 tumor. J Urol 1994;152(5):1799–805.
8. Budäus L., Bolla M., Bossi A. et al. Functional outcomes and complications following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2012;61(1):112–27.
9. Heidenreich A., Bellmunt J., Bolla M. et al. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer, 2012.
10. De Ridder D., Rehder P. The AdVance male sling: anatomic features in relation to mode of action. Eur Urol Suppl 2011;10: 383–9.
11. Rehder P., Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;52 (3):860–7.
12. Пошаговое иллюстрированное руководство по имплантации AMS Advance (Эдванс). Электронный ресурс: http://ams-ussia.ru/upload/pdf/articles/Advance/1advance_sbs. pdf
13. Engel R. M., Wade J. C. Experience with the Berry prosthesis. J Urol 1969;102:78–80.
14. Kishev S. V. Surgery for male urinary incontinence. In: Urologic Surgery. 2nd ed. J. F. Glenn, ed. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott, 1975:596–611.
15. Kaufman J. J. A new operation for male incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;131:295–9.
16. Carmel M., Hage B., Hanna S. et al. Longterm efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2010;106 (7):1012–6.
17. Guimarães M., Oliveira R., Pinto R. et al. Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. BJU Int 2009;103(4):500–4.
18. Bochove-Overgaauw D. M., Schrier B. Ph. An adjustable sling for the treatment of all degrees of male stress urinary incontinence: retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications after a minimal followup of 14 months. J Urol 2011;185(4):1363–8.
19. Sousa-Escandón A., Cabrera J., Mantovani F. et al. Adjustable suburethral sling (male remeex system) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol 2007;52(5):1473–80.
20. Rehder P., Freiin von Gleissenthall G., Pichler R., Glodny B. The treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence with the retroluminal transobturator repositioning sling (Advance): lessons learned from accumulative experience. Arch Esp Urol 2009;62:860–70.
Review
For citations:
Veliyev E.I., Golubtsova E.N., Tomilov A.A. MINI-INVASIVE TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER PROSTATE CANCER RADICAL TREATMENT. Cancer Urology. 2013;9(4):37-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2013-9-4-37-42
Views:
746
Email this article 