Function of the orthotopic urinary reservoir formed from the ileocecal angle in the long term after radical cystectomy in women
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-4-136-146
Abstract
Objective: to study the long-term functional results of creating an orthotopic urinary reservoir from the ileocecal angle in comparison with the Studer technique of creating a urinary reservoir after radical cystectomy in women.
Materials and methods. From 2004 to 2018 radical cystectomy for bladder cancer was performed in 120 women. In 71 (59.2 %) patients, an orthotopic urinary reservoir was formed: 48 (67.6 %) from the ileum, 23 (32.4 %) from segments of the colon. This study included 11 patients who had a reservoir formed from the ileocecal angle, including by their own modification, and 13 patients who had a reservoir forme by Studer. The average age of the patients was 62.6 ± 2.6 (29—82) years. The average follow-up time was 77.1 ± 10.5 (19—184) months. The presence and degree of urinary incontinence was assessed using a questionnaire and a Pad test. 12 months or more after the operation, a complex urodynamic study was performed.
Results. The overall 5-year survival rate was 92.3 %: in the Studergroup it was 90.9 %, in the ileocecal angle group it was 100 % (p = 0.317). In the general population of patients, 37.5 % were completely continent. Women after plastic surgery by Studer retained urine better than after plastic surgery by ileocecal angle (46.2 % vs 27.3 %), the difference was only for mild urinary incontinence, which was more common in the ileocecal angle group. The frequency of severe urinary incontinence in both groups was the same. Nocturnal urinary incontinence was more common in patients in the Studer group (46.2 %). In the group of patients with ileocecal angle plastic surgery, there was no chronic urinary retention requiring intermittent catheterization, and in the group of Studer plastic surgery — in 1 (7.7 %) case. Analysis of urodynamic parameters revealed the presence of a greater physiological capacity of the urinary reservoir in the group of patients after plastic surgery according to Studer (p = 0.043). In the group of patients with ileocecal angle plastic surgery, higher values of the maximum pressure of the reservoir wall, “leakage pressure” and maximum expulsion pressure are observed, possibly associated with a more pronounced muscle layer of the intestinal segment used.
Conclusion. The functional results of the orthotopic reservoir formedfrom the ileocecal angle are comparable to the results of urine derivation using the classical Studer method. Complex urodynamic study showed a direct influence of various characteristics of the reservoir on the nature and degree of urination disorders in patients.
About the Authors
V. A. AtduevRussian Federation
10/1 Minina and Pozharskogo Ploshchad’, Nizhniy Novgorod 603950; 2 Nizhnevolzhskaya Naberezhanya, Nizhniy Novgorod 603001
Competing Interests: not
Z. K. Kushaev
Russian Federation
10/1 Minina and Pozharskogo Ploshchad’, Nizhniy Novgorod 603950
Competing Interests: not
D. S. Ledyaev
Russian Federation
10/1 Minina and Pozharskogo Ploshchad’, Nizhniy Novgorod 603950; 2 Nizhnevolzhskaya Naberezhanya, Nizhniy Novgorod 603001
Competing Interests: not
Yu. O. Lyubarskaya
Russian Federation
2 Nizhnevolzhskaya Naberezhanya, Nizhniy Novgorod 603001
Competing Interests: not
Z. V. Amoev
Russian Federation
2 Nizhnevolzhskaya Naberezhanya, Nizhniy Novgorod 603001
Competing Interests: not
V. E. Gasrataliev
Russian Federation
10/1 Minina and Pozharskogo Ploshchad’, Nizhniy Novgorod 603950; 2 Nizhnevolzhskaya Naberezhanya, Nizhniy Novgorod 603001
Competing Interests: not
G. I. Shejyhov
Russian Federation
2 Nizhnevolzhskaya Naberezhanya, Nizhniy Novgorod 603001
Competing Interests: not
I. S. Shevelev
Russian Federation
2 Nizhnevolzhskaya Naberezhanya, Nizhniy Novgorod 603001
Competing Interests: not
References
1. Witjes J.A., Bruins H.M., Cathomas R. et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2020 Guidelines. EAU Guidelines 2020;S0302-2838(20)30230-X. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055.
2. Lee R.K., Abol-Enein H., Artibani W. et al. Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int 2014;113(1):11-23. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12121.
3. Hautmann R.E., Volkmer B.G., Abol-Enein H. et al. Urinary Diversion. Bladder cancer. Eds: M. Soloway, S. Khoury. 2nd International Consultation on Bladder Cancer. Vienna. 2nd edn. 2012. Pp. 343-378. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.050.
4. Stenzl A., Jarolim L., Coloby P. et al. Urethra-sparing cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion in women with malignant pelvic tumors. Cancer
5. Gakis G., Stenzl A. Ileal neobladder and its variants. Eur Urol Suppl 2010;9(10):745-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.eursup.2010.10.001.
6. Chang D., Lawrentschuk N. Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction. Urol Ann 2015;7(1):1-7. DOI: 10.4103/09747796.148553.
7. Nieuwenhuijzen J.A., de Vries R.R., Bex A. et al. Urinary diversions after cystectomy: the association of clinical factors, complications and functional results of four different diversions. Eur Urol 2008;53(4):834-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.008.
8. Flack K., Monn M.F., Kaimakliotis H.Z., Koch M.O. Functional and clinicopathologic outcomes using a modified vescica ileale padovana technique. Bladder Cancer 2015;1(1):73-9. DOI: 10.3233/BLC-140002.
9. Thuroff J.W, Franzaring L., Gillilzer R. et al. Simplified orthotopic ileocaecal pouch (Mainz pouch) for bladder substitution. BJU Int 2005;96:443-65. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41601.
10. Figurin K.M. Cystectomy. Orthotopic bladder according to Mainz-pouch I. Clinical oncourology. Ed.: B.P. Matveev. Moscow: ABV-press, 2011. Pp. 403-404. (In Russ).
11. Atduev V.A., Ledyaev D.S. Lyubarskaya Yu.O. et al. Method for forming an orthotopic urinary reservoir after radical cystectomy in muscular-non-invasive bladder cancer in females. Patent 2685374 Russian Federation. МПК А61В17/00. Applicant and patentee Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia. Request No. 2018132418 dated 11.09.2018, published 17.04.2019. Available at: https://www.fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet?DB=RUPAT&rn=2169&DocNumber=2685374&TypeFile=pdf. (In Russ.).
12. Ali-el-Dein B., Shaaban A.A., Abu-Eideh R.H. et al. Surgical complications following radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder in women. J Urol 2008;180:206-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.080.
13. Stein J.P., Penson D.F., Wu S.D. et al. Pathological guidelines for orthotopic urinary diversion in women with bladder cancer: a review of the literature. J Urol 2007;178:756-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.013.
14. Hautmann R.E., Volkmer B.G., Schumacher M.C. et al. Long-term results of standard procedures in urology: the ileal neobladder. World J Urol 2006;24:305-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-006-0105-z.
15. Granberg C.F., Boorjian S.A., Crispen P.L. et al. Functional and oncological outcomes after orthotopic neobladder reconstruction in women. BJU Int 2008;102(11):1551-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07909.x.
16. Nesrallah L.J., Almeid F.G., Dall’oglio M.F. et al. Experience with the orthotopic ileal neobladder in women: midterm follow-up. BJU Int 2005;95(7):1045-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05463.x.
17. Stein J.P., Penson D.F., Lee C. et al. Long-term oncological outcomes in women undergoing radical cystectomy and orthotopic diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol 2009;181(5):2052-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.020.2001;92(7):1864-71.
18. El Bahnasawy M.S., Osman Y., Gomha M.A. et al. Nocturnal enuresis in men with an orthotopicilealreservoir: urodynamic evaluation. J Urol 2000;164:10-3. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67437-X.
Review
For citations:
Atduev V.A., Kushaev Z.K., Ledyaev D.S., Lyubarskaya Yu.O., Amoev Z.V., Gasrataliev V.E., Shejyhov G.I., Shevelev I.S. Function of the orthotopic urinary reservoir formed from the ileocecal angle in the long term after radical cystectomy in women. Cancer Urology. 2020;16(4):136-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-4-136-146