Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-4-112-119

Abstract

Background. Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignant diseases in men worldwide, with over 1.1 million cases of PCa reported annually. In the Russian Federation, the proportion of patients with stage I—II PCa from 2008 to 2018 increased from 37.6 % to 56 %, which in turn allows more and more patients to perform radical treatment methods. However, it should be noted that the number of patients with both recurrent PCa after radiation therapy (external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy) and with local recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RPE) is steadily increasing.

Objective. Improve treatment outcomes for patients with recurrent PCa.

Materials and methods. A. F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, since 2016, has been treating patients with recurrent PCa using salvage high-dose brachytherapy (SHDR) (192Ir) after radical radiation treatment (EBRT, brachytherapy) or with local recurrence after RPE. Patients with recurrent PCa were divided into three groups, depending on the type of initial radical treatment: patients with recurrent disease after RPE, after EBRT and after brachytherapy.

Results. The most favorable results of SHDR were registered in the group of patients with local recurrence after RPE: in 7 patients out of 8 (87 %), one year after the PSA, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was less than 0.1 ng/mL. In 1 patient, the PSA level dropped to 0.71 ng/mL (baseline 2.47 ng/mL) two years after salvage treatment. Currently, there is a further decrease in PSA levels.

Results after SHDR (192Ir) in patients with relapse after EBRT: of 8 patients, 2 (25 %) had PSA levels less than 0.2 ng/mL after a year. In 4 patients, the PSA level two years after treatment was more than 2.0 ng/mL. In these patients, a relapse was registered. Another 2 patients also had a repeated relapse after SHDR.

The following results were obtained after carrying out SHDR in patients with relapse after braahythempy (both low- and high-dose). Of the 12patients, 7patients (58 %) had PSA levels less than 0.5 ng/mL two years after SHDR. SHDR was performed in the mode of two fractions of 12.5 Gyerahwith an interval of two weeks between them. In 3 patients, the PSA level exceeded 0.5 ng/ mL two years after the salvage treatment, and therefore, a second relapse is determined in them. Another 2 patients also had a repeated relapse.

Conclusion. This article provides preliminary results of our research. We would like to reiterate that as possible options for the treatment of local recurrence of PCa, it is possible to choose salvage prostatectomy, salvage radiation therapy, hormonal therapy or SHDR brachytherapy. In some cases EBRT is used in this category of patients, however, this can lead to the development of severe radiation damage. The choice of a treatment method in case of recurrent PCa is a complex problem, the decision of which is based on many factors. The clinical course of PCa, the prevalence of the disease, the level of markers, and molecular genetic data are taken into account.

About the Authors

A. D. Kaprin
A. F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


S. A. Ivanov
A. F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


O. B. Karyakin
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


A. A. Obuhov
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


V. A. Biryukov
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031
Competing Interests: not


N. B. Borysheva
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


D. B. Sanin
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


O. G. Lepilina
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


A. L. Smolkin
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


A. V. Dem’yanovich
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


N. G. Minaeva
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


N. V. Mikhaylovskiy
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4 Koroleva St., Obninsk 249031


Competing Interests: not


References

1. Guidelines of European Association of Urology, 2020, www.uroweb.org.

2. State of oncological care in Russia in 2018. Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena - filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2019. 236 p. (In Russ.).

3. NCCN Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy. NCCN Guidelines for patients. Prostate cancer, 2019.

4. Brachytherapy. Ed.: A.D. Kaprin, Yu.S. Mardynskiy. Obninsk: MRNTS im. A.F. Tsyba - filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2017. (In Russ.).

5. Tisseverasinghe S.A., Crook J.M. The role of salvage brachytherapy for local relapse after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2018;7(3):414-35. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.05.09.

6. Solodkiy V.A., Pavlov A.Yu., Tsybul’skiy A.D. Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for local prostate cancer recurrence after radical radiotherapy. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2016;12(4):81-6. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2016-12-4-81-86.

7. Therapeutic radiology: national guideline. Ed.: A.D. Kaprin, Yu.S. Mardynskiy. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2018. 704 p.

8. Olarte A., Cambeiro M., Moreno-Jimenez M. et al. Dose escalation with external beamradiation therapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy in high and very high risk prostate cancer: Comparison of two consecutive high-dose-rate schemes. Brachytherapy 2016;15(2):127-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.12.008.

9. Matei D.V., Ferro M., Jereczek-Fossa B.A. et al. Salvage radical prostatectomy after external beam radiation therapy: a systematic review of current approaches. Urol Int 2015;94(4):373-82. DOI: 10.1159/000371893.

10. Grado G.L., Collins J.M., Kriegshauser J.S. et al. Salvage brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer after radiotherapy failure. Urology 1999;53(1):2-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00492-0.

11. Kaprin A.D., Galkin V.N., Ivanov S.A. Role of brachytherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Biomedical Photonics 2015;4(4):21-6. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Kaprin A.D., Ivanov S.A., Karyakin O.B., Obuhov A.A., Biryukov V.A., Borysheva N.B., Sanin D.B., Lepilina O.G., Smolkin A.L., Dem’yanovich A.V., Minaeva N.G., Mikhaylovskiy N.V. Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. Cancer Urology. 2020;16(4):112-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-4-112-119

Views: 3178


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X