Islam and urostoma: a modern view through the prism of a religiously traditional legal system
E. M. Mamizhev,
I. B. Dzhalilov,
B. I. Aslanov,
T. Kh. Kemryugov,
S. S. Krestianinov,
V. K. Osetnik,
A. A. Kharsov https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-3-205-208
Abstract
Patients who practice Islam often refuse the proposed type of treatment for malignant neoplasms, citing religious reasons. Most fear that complete or partial non-retention of urine, the presence of a urostoma (ileal conduit) will violate their ritual purity and, as a result, their religious duties. The consequence of such refusal of treatment may be a lower quality of life, compared with patients of other faiths. Unfortunately, a low awareness of religious responsibilities among surgeons performing pelvic exentesis, cystectomy, prostatectomy, may prevent a full-fledged discussion of these issues before surgery. The presented review of the literature examined studies, legal aspects, and religious arguments that assist doctors in choosing treatment tactics for patients.
About the Authors
E. M. Mamizhev
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
154 Fontanka River Embankment, Saint-Petersburg 190103.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
154 Fontanka River Embankment, Saint-Petersburg 190103.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
I. B. Dzhalilov
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
154 Fontanka River Embankment, Saint-Petersburg 190103.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
154 Fontanka River Embankment, Saint-Petersburg 190103.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
B. I. Aslanov
I.I. Mechnikov North-West State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
47 Piskarevskiy Prospekt, Saint-Petersburg 195067.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
47 Piskarevskiy Prospekt, Saint-Petersburg 195067.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
T. Kh. Kemryugov
Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
2 Peterburgskoe Shosse, Pushkin, Saint-Petersburg 196601.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
2 Peterburgskoe Shosse, Pushkin, Saint-Petersburg 196601.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
S. S. Krestianinov
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
154 Fontanka River Embankment, Saint-Petersburg 190103.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
154 Fontanka River Embankment, Saint-Petersburg 190103.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
V. K. Osetnik
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
154 Fontanka River Embankment, Saint-Petersburg 190103.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
154 Fontanka River Embankment, Saint-Petersburg 190103.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. A. Kharsov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Islam. Department of State Confessions zional relations RANEPA under the President of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.).
2. Malashenko A.V. Islam for Russia. Moscow, 2007.192 p. (In Russ.).
3. Silant'ev R. Recent history of the Islamic community in Russia. Moscow, 2005. P. 147. (In Russ.).
4. Silant'ev R. Islam in modern Russia: an encyclopedia. Moscow, 2008. P. 12. (In Russ.).
5. Iqbal F., Zaman S., Bowley D.M., Vaizey C.J. Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy in Muslim patients. Gut 2014;63(7):1197-8. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306136.
6. Iqbal F., Batool Z., Varma S. et al. A survey to assess knowledge among international colorectal clinicians and enterostomal therapy nurses about stoma-related faith needs of Muslim patients. Ostomy Wound Manage 2014;60(5):28-37.
7. Miah S., Mangera A., Osman N.I. et al. Islam and the urinary stoma: a contemporary theological and urological dilemma. Eur Urol Focus 2019;5(2):301-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.06.015.
8. Stein J.P., Lieskovsky G., Cote R. et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001;19(3):666-75. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666.
9. Hautmann R.E., Abol-Enein H., Hafez K. et al. Urinary diversion. Urology 2007;69 (1 Suppl):17-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.058
10. Stenzl A. Bladder substitution. Curr Opin Urol 1999;9(3):241-5. DOI: 10.1097/00042307-199905000-00009.
11. Clifford T.G., Shah S.H., Bazargani S.T. et al. Prospective evaluation of continence following radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion using a validated questionnaire. J Urol 2016;196(6):1685-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.093.
12. Bartsch G., Daneshmand S., Skinner E.C. et al. Urinary functional outcomes in female neobladder patients. World J Urol 2014;32(1):221-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1219-8.
13. Yang L.S., Shan B.L., Shan L.L. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Surg Oncol 2016;25(3):281-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.05.027.
14. Carlsson S., Nilsson A.E., Schumacher M.C. et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology 2010;75(5):1092-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.075.
15. Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55(5): 1037-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036.
16. Rabbani F., Yunis L.H., Pinochet R. et al. Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57(3):371-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.034.
17. Resnick M.J., Koyama T., Fan K.H. et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;368(5):436-45. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209978.
18. Haglind E., Carlsson S., Stranne J. et al. Corrigendum re: “Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial” [Eur Urol 2015;68:216-25]. Eur Urol 2017;72(3):e81-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.022.
19. Haglind E., Carlsson S., Stranne J. et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol 2015;68 (2):216-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029.
20. Black A. Fatwas and surgery: how and why a fatwa may inform a Muslim patient's surgical options. ANZ J Surg 2009;79(12):866-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05135.x.
21. Kuzu M.A., Topcu O., Ucar K. et al. Effect of sphincter-sacrificing surgery for rectal carcinoma on quality of life in Muslim patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45(10):1359-66. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6425-4.
22. Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence. Publisher Kuwait Ministry of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs, 2005.
23. Journal of the Islamic Fiqh Academy, 2013.
24. Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by national voting on 12.12.1993) (with amendments No. 6-ФКЗ dated 30.12.2008, No. 7-ФКЗ dated 30.12.2008, No. 2-ФКЗ dated 05.02.2014, No. 11-ФКЗ dated 21.07.2014). (In Russ.).
25. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 2-П dated 09.02.2012 “On the case of checking the constitutionality of part eight of article 325 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in response to the complaint of I.G. Trunova”. Rossiyskaya Gazeta = Russian Newspaper 2012;(55). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Mamizhev E.M., Dzhalilov I.B., Aslanov B.I., Kemryugov T.Kh., Krestianinov S.S., Osetnik V.K., Kharsov A.A. Islam and urostoma: a modern view through the prism of a religiously traditional legal system. Cancer Urology. 2020;16(3):205-208. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-3-205-208
Views:
1060
Email this article 