Role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of renal tumors
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2005-1-3-5-9
Abstract
Laparoscopic access allows radical nephrectomy and renal resection to be performed in patients with small tumors, including in those with renal cancer of T1-2, by providing the immediate and early results comparable with those of open interventions. The advantages of the laparoscopic access are low traumatism, less length of stay, a good cosmetic effect, and shorter rehabilitation. At the same time simultaneous operations may be performed. The future role of laparoscopy shall be defined when the 5-year survival rates are assessed.
About the Authors
V. B. Matveyev
ГУ РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. G. Komarov
ГУ РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
B. Ya. Alekseyev
МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. L. Medvedev
РостГМУ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. I. Kogan
РостГМУ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. I. Volkova
ГУ РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Polyakov
МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Gusev
РостГМУ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Abbou C.C., Cicco A., Gasman D. et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopy versus open radical nephrectomy // J. Urol. — 1999; 161: 1776—1780.
2. Rassweiler J., Fornara P., Weber M. еt al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: the experience of the laparoscopic working group of the German Urological Association // J. Urol. — 1998; 160: 18—21.
3. McDougall E.M., Claiman R.V., Elashry O.M. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: the Washington University experience // J. Urol. — 1996; 155:1180—1185.
4. McDougall E.M., Claiman R.V., Elashry O.M. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell cancer: Washington University experience // J. Urol. — 1995; 154: 975—980.
5. Portis J.A., Yan Y., Landman J. et al. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy // J.Urol. — 2002; Mar; 167(3): 1257—1262.
6. Baumert H., Khan F., Shah N. et al. Laparascopic radical nephrectomy with lymph node dissection for advanced renal cell carcinoma (pT3aN2) //XX EAU Congress, Istanbul. — 2005. — Vol. 17.
7. Eswar C., Badillo F.L. Vascular control of the renal pedicle using the hem-o-lok polymer ligating clip in 50 consecutive hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomies //J.Endourol. — 2004. — Vol. 18 (5). — P. 459—461.
8. Joseph J., Leung Y.Y., Eichel L. et al. Comparison of the Ti-knot device and Hem-o-lok clips with other devices commonly used for laparoscopic renal-artery ligation //J.Endourol. — 2004. — Vol. 18 (2). — P. 163—166.
9. deKernion J.B., Belldegrun A. Renal tumors. //Campbell’s Urology. — 6 ed. Edited by Walsh P.C., Retik A.B., Stamey T.A., Vaughan I.D. — USA: W.B. Saunders Company. — 1992. — Vol. 2. — P. 1074—1075.
10. Sagalowsky A.I., Kadesky K.T., Ewalt D.M. et al. Factors influencing adrenal metastasis in renal carcinoma // J. Urol. — 1994; 151: 1181—1184.
11. Blom J.H.M., van Poppel H., Mareshal J.M. et al. Radical nephrectomy with or without Lymph Node Dissection: preliminary Results of the EORTC Randomized Phase III Protocol 30881 // Eur. Urol. — 1999. — Vol. 36. — P. 565—569.
12. Winfield H.N., Donovan J.F., Lund G.O. et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience and comparison to the open surgical approach // J. Urol. — 1995; 153: 1409—1414.
13. Rasweiler J., Abbou C., Janetschek G. et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, the European experience // Urol. Clin. N. Am. — 2000; 27: 721—736.
14. Jeschke K., Peschel R., Wakonig L. et al. Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors // Urology. — 2001; 58: 688—692.
15. Desai M.M., Gill I.S., Kaouk J.H. et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with suture repair of the pelvicaliceal system // Urology. — 2003; 61: 99—104.
16. Guillonneau B., Bermudez H., Gholami S. et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: single center experience comparing clamping and no clamping techniques of the renal vasculature // J Urol. — 2003; 169: 483—486.
17. Wolf J.S. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy // J. Urol. — 2002; 167: 475—476.
18. Esser G. Prophylaktische und simultane Operationen im abdomen // Laugenbeks Arch. Chir. — 1986. — Bd. 369. — P. 293—303.
19. Gill I.S., Matin S.F., Desai M.M. et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients // J. Urol. — 2003. — Vol. 170. — P. 64—68.
20. Holzheimer R.G. Laparoscopic procedures as a risk factor of deep venous thrombosis, superficial ascending thrombophlebitis and pulmonary embolism—case report and review of the literature //Eur. J. Med. Res. — 2004. — Vol. 29. — P. 417—422.
21. Catheline J.M., Capelluto E., Gaillard J.L. Thromboembolism prophylaxis and incidence of thromboembolic complications after laparoscopic surgery // Int. J. Surg. Investig. — 2000. — Vol. 2 (1). — P. 41—47.
Review
For citations:
Matveyev V.B., Komarov I.G., Alekseyev B.Ya., Medvedev V.L., Kogan M.I., Volkova M.I., Polyakov V.A., Gusev A.A. Role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of renal tumors. Cancer Urology. 2005;1(3):5-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2005-1-3-5-9
Views:
252
Email this article 