Surgical treatment policy for locally advanced small pelvic tumors involving the bladder
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2006-2-2-26-30
Abstract
As high as 40% of patients have locally advanced pelvic tumors without distant metastases and many of them have previously undergone radical treatment. The only possible treatment for these patients is combined and expanded surgery.
Subjects and methods: In 1996 to 2004, a total of 38 patients with locally advanced pelvic tumors involving the bladder underwent different types of evisceration at the Department of Radiosurgery, Russian Cancer Research Center. There were internal fistulas in 18 cases. Total evisceration was performed in 4 (10.5%) patients, subtotal supralevator evisceration in 25 (65.8%), subtotal infralevator evisceration in 3 (7.9%), and frontal evisceration in 6 (15.8%) patients. Thirty-one (81.6%) patients underwent ureteral reconstruction without ureterostomy; normal stool restored in 35 (92.1%) patients.
Results: One (2.6%) patient died intraoperatively. Twenty-eight patients had postoperative complications that needed resurgery in 12 cases. Three patients with the single-stage ileal orthitopic bladder reported that they had a fair urinary retention. One patient complained about nocturnal urinary incontinence. Stool retention was fair in all cases.
Conclusion: Careful selection of patients, comprehensive preoperative preparation, and improved surgical performance will reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
About the Authors
M. I. DavydovRussian Federation
T. S. Odaryuk
Russian Federation
M. I. Nechushkin
Russian Federation
I. A. Fainshtein
Russian Federation
A. V. Trigolosov
Russian Federation
V. Yu. Strakhov
Russian Federation
T. G. Gevorkyan
Russian Federation
References
1. Федоров В.Д., Воробьев Г.И., Ривкин В.Л. Клиническая оперативная колопроктология. М. 1994: 258–63.
2. Гоцадзе Д.Т., Чакветадзе В.Т., Данелия Э.В. Результаты модифицированной цистэктомии с сохранением простаты и семенных пузырьков. В кн.: Актуальные вопросы лечения онкоурологических заболеваний. Тезисы VI научнопрактической конференции. М. 2005: 41–2.
3. Даренков С.П., Самсонов Ю.В., Чернышев И.В. и соавт. Качество жизни больных после радикальной цистэктомии при инвазивном раке мочевого пузыря. В кн.: Актуальные вопросы лечения онкоурологических заболеваний. Тезисы VI научно-практической конференции. М. 2005: 44–5.
4. Красный С.А., Суконко О.Г., Поляков С.Л. и соавт. Влияние метода отведения мочи после радикальной цистэктомии на отдаленные результаты лечения больных раком мочевого пузыря. В кн.: Актуальные вопросы лечения онкоурологических заболеваний. Тезисы VI научно-практической конференции. М. 2005: 53–4.
5. Одарюк Т.С., Воробьев Г.И., Шелыгин Ю.А. Хирургия рака прямой кишки. М. 2005: 158–65.
6. Давыдов М.И., Одарюк Т.С., Нечушкин М.И. и соавт. Обширные комбинированные вмешательства в хирургическом лечении местно-распространенных новообразований органов малого таза. Вопр онкол 1998; 4(5): 618–22.
7. Bricker E.M. Pelvic exenteration. Adv Surg 1970;4:13–9.
8. Brunschwig A. Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma. Cancer 1948; 1: 177–83.
9. Merz V.W., Studer U.E. Bladder substitutes made of cross folder ileum Scan. J Urol Nefr Suppl 1988;142:100–4.
10. Ketcham A.S., Deckers P.J., Surgerbaker E.V. Pelvic exenteration for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a 15-year experience. Cancer 1970; 26: 189–92.
11. Margina J.F. Types of pelvic exenterations: a reappraisal Gynecol Oncol 1990; 37(2): 234–8.
12. Stanhope C.R., Webb M.J. Pelvic exenteration. In Atlas of surgical oncology. Eds. Donohue J.H. et al. Blackwell Science 1995: 310–8.
Review
For citations:
Davydov M.I., Odaryuk T.S., Nechushkin M.I., Fainshtein I.A., Trigolosov A.V., Strakhov V.Yu., Gevorkyan T.G. Surgical treatment policy for locally advanced small pelvic tumors involving the bladder. Cancer Urology. 2006;2(2):26-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2006-2-2-26-30