Intestinal plastic repair for urinary bladder cancer
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2006-2-4-25-29
Abstract
The results of surgical treatment of 79 patients with invasive bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy with continent urinary diversion (ileal neobladder) between 1997 and 2005 were analyzed. The incidence of early and late complications was 12.7 and 15.5%, respectively; postoperative mortality was 2.5%. The reservoir volume was 250—300, 400—450, and 500—600 ml 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, respectively. Spontaneous urination and day time continence was restored in 100%; partial nocturnal incontinence was noted in 11.7% of the patients. In the vast majority of cases, renal function was not impaired or improved. Thus, radical cystectomy with bladder substitution with low-pressure ileal reservoirs with anti-reflux ureteric implantation is the method of choice in treating invasive bladder cancer.
About the Authors
L. V. Shaplygin
N.N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital; A.A. Vishnevsky Central Military Clinical Hospital, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. V. Sitnikov
N.N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital; A.A. Vishnevsky Central Military Clinical Hospital, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. V. Furashov
N.N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital; A.A. Vishnevsky Central Military Clinical Hospital, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. I. Dronov
N.N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital; A.A. Vishnevsky Central Military Clinical Hospital, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. Ye. Segedin
N.N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital; A.A. Vishnevsky Central Military Clinical Hospital, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Sidorov
N.N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital; A.A. Vishnevsky Central Military Clinical Hospital, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Матвеев Б.П., Фигурин К.М., Карякин О.Б. Рак мочевого пузыря. М., Вердана; 2001.
2. Лопаткин Н.А., Даренков С.П., Чернышев И.В. и др. Радикальное лечение инвазивного рака мочевого пузыря. Урология 2003; 4: 3–8.
3. Комяков Б.К., Горелов С.И., Новиков А.И. и др. Ближайшие результаты радикальных цистэктомий. Урология 2003; 4: 15–7.
4. Комяков Б.К., Горелов С.И., Новиков А.И. и др. Ортотопическая пластика мочевого пузыря сегментом желудка. Урология 2004; 3: 32–5.
5. Комяков Б.К., Новиков А.И., Гулиев Б.Г. и др. Восстановление мочевыводящих путей различными отделами желудочно-кишечного тракта. Урология 2005; 5: 12–7.
6. Hautmann R.E., De Pertriconi R., Gottfried H.-W. et al. The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followup. J Urol 1999; 161 (2): 422–8.
7. Stein J.P., Lieskovsky G., Groshen S. et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(3): 666–75.
8. Studer U.E., Zingg E.J. Ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes. What we vave learned from 12 years experience with 200 patients. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 24: 780–93.
9. Studer U.E., Stenzl A., Mansson W., Mills R. Bladder replacement and urinary diversion. Eur Urol 2000; 8: 1–11.
10. Морозов А.В., Антонов М.И., Павленко К.А. Замещение мочевого пузыря сегментом кишечника (ортотопическая реконструкция мочевого пузыря). Урология 2000; 3: 17–22.
11. Шаплыгин Л.В., Ситников Н.В., Фурашов Д.В. и др. Радикальная цистэктомия в лечении инвазивного рака мочевого пузыря. Воен-мед журн 2003; 12: 43–6.
12. Немытин Ю.В., Ситников Н.В., Дронов В.И. и др. Морфо-функциональные особенности кишечного мочевого резервуара. Воен-мед журн 2004; 11: 20–6.
13. Сидоров В.А. Инвазивный рак мочевого пузыря. Хирургическое лечение: Автореф. дис… докт. мед. наук. М., 2004.
14. Сидоров В.А., Шаплыгин Л.В., Ситников Н.В. и др. Функция почек после кишечной пластики при раке мочевого пузыря. Урология 2005; 2: 32–5.
Review
For citations:
Shaplygin L.V., Sitnikov N.V., Furashov D.V., Dronov V.I., Segedin R.Ye., Sidorov V.A. Intestinal plastic repair for urinary bladder cancer. Cancer Urology. 2006;2(4):25-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2006-2-4-25-29
Views:
321
Email this article 