Diagnostic capacities of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of prostate cancer

1. O'Dowd G.J., Veltri R.W., Orozco R. et al. Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. J Urol 1997;158(3 Pt 1):687—98.

2. Partin A.W., Yoo J., Carter H.B. et al. The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1993;150:110—4.

3. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Schnall M. et al. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer.Cancer 1995;75:2368—72.

4. Song C., Kang T., Ro J.Y. et al. Nomograms for the prediction of pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men. J Korean Med Sci 2005;20(2):262—6.

5. Carver B.S., Bianco F.J. Jr., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy in men with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. J Urol 2006;176(2):564—8.

6. Leewansangtong S., Soontrapa S., Nualyong C. et al. Is radical prostatectomy in thai men a high morbidity surgery for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer? J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88(12):1833—7.

7. Rifkin M.D., Zerhouni E.A., Gatsonis C.A. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer: results of multiinstitutional cooperative trial. N Engl J Med 1990;323(4):621—6.

8. Torricelli P., Cinquantini F., Ligabue G. et al. Comparative evaluation between external phased array coil at 3 T and endorectal coil at 1.5 T: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30(3):355—61.

9. Sala E., Akin O., Moskowitz C.S. et al. Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology 2006;238(3):929—37.

10. Brassell S.A., Krueger W.R., Choi J.H., Taylor J.A. 3rd. Correlation of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with pathologic stage. World J Urol 2004;22(4):289—92.

11. Jager G.J., Ruijter E.T., van de Kaa C.A. et al. Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(4):845—52.

12. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Schnall M. et al. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer. Cancer 1995;75(9):2368—72.

13. Sala E., Eberhardt S.C., Akin O. et al. Endorectal MR imaging before salvage prostatectomy: tumor localization and staging. Radiology 2006;238(1):176—83.

14. Mullerad M., Hricak H., Wang L. et al. Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232(1):140—6.

15. Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education, and Research. 2005. Available from: www.imrser.org; www.mrisafety.com

16. Siegel C. Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging. J Urol 2005;174(2):569.

17. Chen M., Hricak H., Kalbhen C.L. et al. Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(5):1157—63.

18. Mueller-Lisse U.G., Vigneron D.B., Hricak H. et al. Localized prostate cancer: effect of hormone deprivation therapy measured by using combined three-dimensional 1H MR spectroscopy and MR imaging: clinicopathologic case-controlled study. Radiology 2001;221(2): 380—90.

19. Outwater E.K., Petersen R.O., Siegelman E.S. et al. Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 1994;193(2):333—9.

20. Jager G.J., Severens J.L., Thornbury J.R. et al. Prostate cancer staging: should MR imaging be used? A decision analytic approach. Radiology 2000;215(2): 445—51.