Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

Comparative analysis of the results of laparoscopic and open nephrectomies in renal parenchymal tumors

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2007-3-3-10-15

Abstract

Objective. To compare the immediate and long-term results of laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomies in renal parenchymal tumors.

Subjects and methods. The study covered 195 patients who underwent nephrectomy in 1986 to 2006. Their median age was 54,1 years; male/female ratio was 1,5:1. All the patients were divided into 2 groups. A study group comprised 102 (52,3%) patients with renal tumors, including 93 (91,2%) with renal-cell carcinoma (pT1-3N0-1M0-1) and 9 (8,8%) with benign tumors, who had undergone laparoscopic nephrectomy. Ninety-three (47,7%) patients who had undergone open radical nephrectomy for localized renal cancer were retrospectively selected for a control group. The median follow-up in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups were 19,6±13,2 and 62,3±35,9 months, respectively.

Results. The median time of laparoscopic nephrectomy was significantly more than that of open surgery (170 and 100 min, respectively; p < 0,001). The median blood loss volume did not differ in the groups (280,1 and 283,5 ml, respectively; p = 0,342). In the study and control groups, the frequency of intraoperative complications was 10,9 and 4,3% (p = 0,075) and that of postoperative ones was 10,8 and 7,5%, respectively (p > 0,05). In 8 (7,9%) cases, conversion was required to suture defects of large vessels. In the laparoscopic group, the median length of stay was significantly less than that in the control group (7,0±3,6 and 12,0±3,1 days, respectively; p < 0,001). The differences were insignificant in the average cost of endoscopic and open surgeries. Questionnaire survey revealed a significant improvement in the quality of life after surgery via laparoscopic access. Relapses were detected in 2 (2,2%) patients from the study group: a local recurrence in 1 (1,1%) patient and metastases in 1 (1,1%); and in 5 (5,4%) control patients: metastases in 4 (4,3%), local relapse and distant metastases in 1 (1,1%; p = 0,271). In renal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic and open nephrectomies, overall, specific, and relapse-free 4-year survival rates were 100; 100, and 94,9% and 96,4, 97,5, and 96,2%, respectively (p > 0,05).

Conclusion. Laparoscopic nephrectomy is the method of choice in treating renal cancer — pT1—3aN0M0, which yields the same long-term results as open surgery and provides a better quality of life.

About the Authors

N. N. Romashchenko
Bryansk Municipal Hospital Two
Russian Federation
Unit of Urology


V. B. Matveyev
N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation

Department of Urology

Moscow



M. I. Volkova
N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation

Department of Urology

Moscow



I. G. Komarov
N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation

Department of Urology

Moscow



References

1. Portis A.J., Yan Y., Landman J. et al. Long-term follow0up after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2002;167:1257—62.

2. Chan D.Y., Cadeddu J.A., Jarrer T.W. et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001;166:2095—100.

3. Saika T., Ono Y., Hattori R. et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2003;62:1018—23.

4. Dunn M.D., Portis A.J., Shalhav A.L. et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1153—9.

5. Siquera T.M., Kuo R.L., Gardner T.A. et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol 2002;168:1361—5.

6. Gill I.S., Kavoussi L.R., Clayman R.F.V. et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multiinstitutional review. J Urol 1995;154:479—83.

7. Holzheimer R.G.Laparoscopic procedures as a risk factor of deep venous thrombosis, superficial ascending thrombophlebitis and pulmonary embolism-case report and review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 2004;29:417—22.

8. Catheline J.M., Capelluto E., Gaillard J.L. Thromboembolism prophylaxis and incidence of thromboembolic complications after laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg Investig 2000;2(1):41—7.

9. Kim I.Y., Clayman R.V. Laoparoscopic radical nephrectomy. In: Genitourinary Oncology. 3rd ed. N.J. Vogelzang, P.T. Scarding, W.U. Shipley, D.S. Coffey (eds). USA, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p. 731—9.

10. Tsui K.-H., Svarts O., Smith R.B. et al. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analisys of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol 2000;163:1090—5.

11. Javidan J., Stricker H.J., Tamboli P. et al. Prognostic significance of 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1999;162:1277—81.


Review

For citations:


Romashchenko N.N., Matveyev V.B., Volkova M.I., Komarov I.G. Comparative analysis of the results of laparoscopic and open nephrectomies in renal parenchymal tumors. Cancer Urology. 2007;3(3):10-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2007-3-3-10-15

Views: 260


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X