Preview

Cancer Urology

Advanced search

Safety of enzalutamide in patients with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy: a phase II, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-1-117-125

Abstract

Background. Enzalutamide, an androgen receptor inhibitor that blocks multiple steps in the androgen receptor signaling pathway, is approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Since the phase III (AFFIRM) pivotal trial did not include Russia patients, this phase II study (NCT02124668) was performed to establish the safety of enzalutamide in patients with progressive CRPC previously treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy in the Eastern European patients population, including the Russia.

Objective: to study safety of enzalutamide in patients with progressive CRPC previously treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy from Eastern European, including the Russia.

Materials and methods. This phase II, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study was conducted at 2 sites in Russia and 2 sites in Georgia. Patients had on going androgen deprivation therapy with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (agonist or antagonist) or had a prior surgical or chiectomy. Patients completed visits on day 1, week 5, week 13 and subsequently every 12 weeks until they were discontinued from the study. The safety of enzalutamide was assessed through evaluations of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, blood pressure, heart rate, electrocardiography and laboratory measurements.

Results. Thirty patients were enrolled and received enzalutamide treatment (mean age 67.5 years (59–80 years)). Median treatment duration was 271 days (3–968 days). By the end of the study, a total of 23 (76.7 %) patients experienced 68 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs). The most frequently reported TEAEs (reported in ≥10 % of patients) were fatigue (n = 7 (23.3 %)), asthenia (n = 6 (20.0 %)), bone pain, metastatic pain, prostatic specific antigen increase from baseline (n = 4 (13.3 %) each) and malignant neoplasm progression (n = 3 (10.0 %)). Most TEAEs were Grade 1 or Grade 2 in severity (35 and 14 events respectively, of a total of 68 AEs). The most frequently reported Grade 3 or higher TEAEs were asthenia (n = 5 (16.7 %)) and bone pain (n = 3 (10.0 %)). Enzalutamide-related TEAEs were experienced by 7 (23.3 %) patients and consisted of the following: fatigue in 3 patients; asthenia in 2 patients; and supraventricular extrasystoles, dizziness, headache, insomnia, pollakiuria and alopecia in 1 patient, each. Six (20.0 %) patients experienced 13 serious TEAEs. The most common serious TEAE was malignant neoplasm progression (n = 3 (1 %)) due to disease progression; all others were single events. Three (10.0 %) patients had died due to serious TEAEs that occurred during the study (2 of prostate cancer progression and 1 of cardiopulmonary and liver failure). No patients experienced an enzalutamide-related Grade 3 or higher TEAEs, an enzalutamide-related serious AEs or an enzalutamide-related TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation. No notable changes from baseline in clinical laboratory parameters or clinically meaningful abnormalities in vital signs, physical examinations, or electrocardiography were found. No cases of seizures were reported.

Conclusion. In this study, enzalutamide in the Eastern European patient population, including the Russia, had a safety profile consistent with that reported in previous enzalutamide studies and no new safety signals were observed.

About the Authors

B. Ya. Alekseev
National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284


Competing Interests: Отсутствие конфликта интересов


V. B. Matveev
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478


Competing Interests: Отсутствие конфликта интересов


A. Chkhotua
A. Tsulukidze National Urology Center
Georgia

9 Tsinandali St., Tbilisi


Competing Interests: Отсутствие конфликта интересов


A. S. Markova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478


Competing Interests: Отсутствие конфликта интересов


References

1. Pienta K.J., Bradley D. Mechanisms underlying the development of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12(6):1665–71. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0067. PMID: 16551847.

2. Chen C.D., Welsbie D.S., Tran C. et al. Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy. Nat Med 2004;10(1):33–9. DOI: 10.1038/nm972. PMID: 14702632.

3. Mottet N., De Santis M., Briers E. et al. Updated guidelines for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: abiraterone acetate combined with castration is another standard. Eur Urol 2017;pii: S0302-2838(17)30839-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.029. PMID: 29103760.

4. Stenzl A., Krivoshik A., Baron B. et al. Efficacy and safety of enzalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy vs placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: the ongoing ARCHES trial. Ann Oncol 2016;27(Suppl 6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw372.51.

5. Scher H.I., Fizazi K., Saad F. et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 2012;367(13):1187–97. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207506. PMID: 22894553.

6. Beer T.M., Armstrong A.J., Rathkopf D.E. et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 2014;371(5):424–33. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405095. PMID: 24881730.

7. Lam E.T., Szmulewitz R.Z., Appleman L.J. et al. Safety of continued administration of enzalutamide in patients with prostate cancer who showed benefit from prior exposure: a phase 2 open-label extension study. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(6 suppl):303.

8. Dharmani C., Bonafede M., Krivoshik A. Risk factors for and incidence of seizures in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study. Clin Drug Investig 2017;37(12):1183–90. DOI: 10.1007/s40261-017-0578-0. PMID: 29027610.

9. Slovin S., Clark W., Carles J. et al. Seizure rates in enzalutamide-treated men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and risk of seizure: the UPWARD study. JAMA Oncol 2017. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3361. PMID: 29222530.

10. Hussain M., Fizazi K., Saad F. et al. PROSPER: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study of enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Genitourinary Cancers Symposium of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). San Francisco, CA, USA. 2018.

11. Gravis G., Fizazi K., Joly F. et al. Androgen-deprivation therapy alone or with docetaxel in non-castrate metastatic prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 15): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(2):149–58. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70560-0. PMID: 23306100.

12. Sweeney C.J., Chen Y.H., Carducci M. et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373(8):737–46. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503747.

13. James N.D., Sydes M.R., Clarke N.W. et al. Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, plat form randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387(10024):1163–77. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01037-5. PMID: 26719232.

14. Tan P.S., Haaland B., Montero A.J. et al. Hormonal therapeutics enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) post-docetaxel – an indirect comparison. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2014:8:29–36. DOI: 10.4137/CMO.S13671. PMID: 24678245.

15. Chopra A., Georgieva M., Lopes G. et al. Abiraterone or enzalutamide in advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer: an indirect comparison. Prostate 2017;77(6):639–46. DOI: 10.1002/pros.23309. PMID: 28101887.

16. Richards J., Lim A.C., Hay C.W. et al. Interactions of abiraterone, eplerenone, and prednisolone with wild-type and mutant androgen receptor: a rationale for increasing abiraterone exposure or combining with MDV3100. Cancer Res 2012;72(9):2176–82. DOI: 10.1158/00085472.CAN-11-3980. PMID: 22411952.

17. Scher H.I., Fizazi K., Saad F. et al. Association of baseline corticosteroid with outcomes in a multivariate analysis of the phase 3 affirm study of enzalutamide (ENZA), an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI). In: European Society for Medical Oncology, 2012. Abstract 2887. Vienna.

18. Scher H.I., Fizazi K., Saad F. et al. Impact of on-study corticosteroid use on efficacy and safety in the phase III AFFIRM study of enzalutamide (ENZA), an androgen receptor inhibitor. In: 2013 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. [J Clin Oncol 2013;31(suppl 6):abstr 6.] Orlando, Florida.


Review

For citations:


Alekseev B.Ya., Matveev V.B., Chkhotua A., Markova A.S. Safety of enzalutamide in patients with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy: a phase II, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study. Cancer Urology. 2018;14(1):117-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-1-117-125

Views: 1079


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X