Neoadjuvant targeted therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma
- Authors: Alekseev B.Y.1,2, Nyushko K.M.1,2, Kalpinsky A.S.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
- 3, Second Botkinsky Pr., Moscow 125284, Russia
- Issue: Vol 11, No 2 (2015)
- Pages: 23-33
- Section: LECTURE
- Published: 30.06.2015
- URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/450
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-2-23-33
- ID: 450
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Cytoreductive nephrectomy as an independent option in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) cannot be considered as the only effective method, with rare exception, of a few patients with solitary metastases. Cytoreductive nephrectomy is now part of a multimodal approach encompassing surgical treatment and systemic drug therapy. Many retrospective and two prospective studies have demonstrated that it is expedient to perform cytoreductive nephrectomy. Immunotherapy should not be used as preoperatively in the era of cytokine therapy for mRCC due to that fact that it has no impact on primary tumor. In the current targeted therapy era, many investigators have concentrated attention
on the role of neoadjuvant targeted therapy for the treatment of patients with both localized and locally advanced mRCC. The potential benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for localized and locally advanced RCC include to make surgery easier and to increase the possibility of organsparing treatment, by decreasing the stage of primary tumor and the size of tumors. The possible potential advantages of neoadjuvant targeted therapy in patients with mRCC include prompt initiation of necessary systemic therapy; identification of patients with primary refractory tumors; and a preoperative reduction in the stage of primary tumor. Numerous retrospective and some prospective phase II studies have shown that neoadjuvant targeted therapy in patients with localized and locally advanced RCC is possible and tolerable and surgical treatment after neoadjuvant targeted therapy is safe and executable with a low incidence of complications. If neoadjuvant therapy is to be performed, it should be done within 2–4 months before surgery. Sorafenib and sunitinib are now most tested and suitable for neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Sorafenib is a more preferred drug due to its shorter half-life and accordingly to the possibility of discontinuing the drug immediately prior to surgery. Unquestionably, elaboration of precise recommendations for neoadjuvant therapy calls for further larger prospective studies estimating progression and survival rates in high-risk patients with localized and locally advanced RCC and in those with mRCC.
About the authors
B. Ya. Alekseev
P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia;3, Second Botkinsky Pr., Moscow 125284, Russia
Russian Federation
K. M. Nyushko
P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia;3, Second Botkinsky Pr., Moscow 125284, Russia
Russian Federation
A. S. Kalpinsky
P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia;3, Second Botkinsky Pr., Moscow 125284, Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.Kalpinskiy@rambler.ru
Russian Federation
References
Supplementary files

