Preview

Онкоурология

Расширенный поиск

Сравнительный анализ функциональных и онкологических результатов радикальной позадилонной простатэктомии, лапароскопической радикальной простатэктомии и робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-3-

Аннотация

Радикальная простатэктомия (РП) является “золотым стандартом” лечения  пациентов с клинически локализованным раком простаты и ожидаемой продолжительностью жизни более 10 лет. Радикальная позадилонная простатэктомия (РПП) до недавнего времени являлась самым распространенным методом радикального лечения рака предстательной железы. За последние десятилетие отмечается прогрессивное развитие минимально инвазивных технологий оперативного лечения рака простаты. В данной статье мы приводим обзор литературы существующих методов оперативного лечения рака простаты, сравнение их функциональных и онкологических результатов

Список литературы

1. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Mottet N, Schmid H, van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F: EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localized disease. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 61–71.

2. Schuessler W, Sculam P, Clayman R, Kavoussi L: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997; 50: 854–857.

3. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000; 163: 1643–1649.

4. Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM: Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy – critical analysis of the results. EurUrol 2006; 49: 612–624.

5. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody J, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002; 168: 945–949.

6. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W: Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 45–56.

7. Artibani W, Cavalleri S, Iafrate M, et al: Learning curve of an experienced open surgeon with da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 2008; 80: 237–244.

8. Bolenz C, Freedland S, Hollenbeck B, Lotan Y, Lowrance W, Nelson J, Hu JC: Costs of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 316–324.

9. Salomon L, Levrel O, de la Taille A, et al: Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 104–111.

10. Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, et al: Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1145–1149.

11. Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385–2389.

12. Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA, et al: A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 170: 1798–1803.

13. Prasad SM, Keating NL, Wang Q, et al: Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72: 647–652.

14. Remzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV, et al: Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 83–89.

15. Jurczok A, Zacharias M, Wagner S, Hamza A, Fornara P: Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response

16. after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2007; 99: 1461–1466.

17. Touijer K, Eastham JA, Secin FP, et al: Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J Urol 2008; 179: 1811–1817.

18. Close A, Robertson C, Rushton S, Shirley M, Vale L, Ramsay C, Pickard R: Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 361–369.

19. Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC: Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 2003; 62: 292–297.

20. Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Hsu TS, Sullivan W, Su LM: Prospective comparison of shortterm convalescence: laparoscopic radical versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61: 612–616.

21. Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, et al: Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World J Urol 2003; 20: 360–366.

22. Artibani W, Grosso G, Novara G, et al: Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of perioperative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 401–406.

23. Egawa S, Kuruma H, Suyama K, Iwamura M, Baba S: Delayed recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2003; 10: 207–212.

24. Atallah F, Khedis M, Seguin P, Fourcade O, Samii K: Postoperative analgesia and recovery after open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1878–1879.

25. Brown JA, Garlitz C, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Diamond SM, Strup SE: Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2004; 22: 102–106.

26. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, de Vries R, Dillenburg W, Becht E: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men older than 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer: comparison of morbidity, reconvalescence, and short-term clinical outcomes between younger and older men. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 1341–1349.

27. Silva E, Ferreira U, Silva GD, et al: Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery. Int Urol Nephrol 2007; 39: 865–869.

28. Terakawa T, Miyake H, Tanaka K, Takenaka A, Inoue TA, Fujisawa M: Surgical margin status of open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy specimens. Int J Urol 2008; 15: 704–707.

29. Fromont G, Guillonneau B, Validire P, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary pathologic evaluation. Urology

30. ; 60: 661–665.

31. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.

32. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T: Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003; 169: 1689–1693.

33. Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Levrel O, et al: Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology 2003; 61: 386–390.

34. Martorana G, Manferrari F, Bertaccini A, et al: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation in the early phase of the learning curve comparing to retropubic approach. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2004; 76: 1–5.

35. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002;

36. : 864–868.

37. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M: A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 205– 210.

38. Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr: Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 360–363.

39. Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, et al: Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 177: 929–931

40. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R, et al: Intra and perioperative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 98–104.

41. Porpiglia F, Morra I, Lucci Chiarissi M, et al: Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 606–614.

42. Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al: Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103: 448–453.

43. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW: Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology 2004; 63: 819–822.

44. Novara G., Ficarra V., D’Elia C. et al. Preoperative criteria to select patients for bilateral nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy // J. Sex Med. – 2012. – Vol.7. – P.839-845


Для цитирования:


Прилепская Е.А. Сравнительный анализ функциональных и онкологических результатов радикальной позадилонной простатэктомии, лапароскопической радикальной простатэктомии и робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Онкоурология. 2015;11(3). https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-3-

For citation:


. . Cancer Urology. 2015;11(3). https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-3-

Просмотров: 294


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X