THE ROLE OF BONE SCINTIGRAPHY IN DETECTION OF BONE METASTASES OF PROSTATE CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-4-70-76
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the relationship between serum PSA and other variables to eliminate bone scanning (BS) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) having a low probability of bone metastasis.
Material and methods. The study included 110 patients with BR after RPE between 2008 and 2012. Bone metastasis was studied for its correlation with various clinical and pathological variables in these patients.
Results. According to multivariate regression analysis the trigger PSA level, PSA doubling time and Gleason sum were independent predictors of detecting of bone metastases using scintigraphy. The frequency of bone metastases was 0 % (95% CI 0,0−14,3) in patients with PSA 5 ng/mL, PSA doubling time 6 month and Gleason sum after RP 6.
Conclusion. For patients with trigger PSA levels of 5 ng/ml or lower, PSA doubling time 6 month or less and Gleason sum 6 or less, BS may be eliminated because of the negligible risk of bone metastases.
About the Authors
P. D. DemeshkoBelarus
O. G. Sukonko
Belarus
S. A. Krasny
Belarus
References
1. Partin A.W., Mangold L.A., Lamm D.M. et al. Contemporary update of the prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001; 58(6):843−48.
2. Bill-Axelson A., Holmberg L., Ruutu M., et al. Scandinavian prostate cancer group study No. 4. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1977−84.
3. Dillioglugil O., Leibman B.D., Kattan M.W. et al. Hazard rates for progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 1997;50:93−9.
4. Han M., Partin A.W., Zahurak M. et al. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;169:517−23.
5. Roberts S.G., Blute M.L., Bergstralh E.J. et al. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;76:576−81.
6. Pound C.R., Partin A.W., Eisenberger M.A. et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1999;281:1591−97.
7. Guidelines on prostate cancer [Electronic resource]. A. Heidenreich [et al.]. European Association of Urology – 2012. Mode of access: http://www.uroweb.org/fileadmin/tx_eauguidelines/2009/Full/Prostate_Cancer.pdf. Date of access: 29.07.2012.
8. Chybowski F.M. Keller J.J., Bergstralh E.J., Oesterling J.E. Predicting radionuclide bone scan findings in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer: prostate specific antigen is superior to all other clinical parameters. J Urol 1991;145:313−18.
9. Rhoden E.L., Torres O., Ramos G.Z. et al. Value of prostate specific antigen in predicting the existence of bone metastasis in scintigraphy. Int. Braz. J Urol 2003;29:121−26.
10. Warren K.S., Chodak G.W., See W.A. Are bone scans necessary in men with low prostate specific antigen levels following localized therapy? J Urol 2006;176(1):70−3.
11. Hirobe M., Takahashi A., Hisasue Shin-ichi et al. Bone scanning–who needs it among patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer? Jpn J Clin Oncol 2007;37(10): 788−92.
12. Oesterling J.E., Martin S.K., Bergstralh E.J., Lowe F.C. The use of prostate specific antigen in staging patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. JAMA 1993; 269(1):57−60.
13. Oesterling J.E. Prostate specific antigen. Its role in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Cancer 1995;75:1795−804.
14. Lee C.T., Oesterling J.E. Using prostatespecific antigen to eliminate the staging radionuclide bone scan. Urol Clin North Am 1997;24:389−94.
15. Akin O., Hricak H. Imaging of prostate cancer. Radiol Clin N Am 2007;45:207−22.
16. Dotan Z.A., Bianco F.J. Jr., Rabbani F. et al. Pattern of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure dictates the probability of a positive bone scan in patients with an increasing PSA after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1962−68.
17. Алгоритмы диагностики и лечения злокачественных новообразований. Под ред. О.Г. Суконко, С.А. Красного. Минск, 2012.
18. Pound Ch.R., Partin A.W., Eisenberger M.A. et al. natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1999;281(17):1591−97.
19. Terris M.K., Klonecke A.S., McDougall I.R. et al. Utilization of bone scans in conjunction with prostate-specific antigen levels in the surveillance for recurrence of adenocarcinoma after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med 1991;32:1713−17.
20. Cher M.L., Bianco F.J. Jr., Lam J.S., et al. Limited role of radionuclide bone scintigraphy in patients with prostate specific antigen elevations after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1998;160:1387−91.
21. Kane C.J., Amling C.L., Johnstone P.A. et al. Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:607−11.
22. Warren K.S., Chodak G.W., See W.A. et al. Are bone scans necessary in men with low prostate specific antigen levels following localized therapy? J Urol 2006;176(1):70−4.
23. D’Amico A.V., Chen M.H., Roehl K.A. et al. Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 2004;351: 125−35.
24. Stephenson A.J., Scardino P.T., Kattan M.W. et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(15):2035−41.
25. Халилов Э.Ш., Красный С.А. Непосредственные и отдаленные результаты хирургического лечения локализованного и местно-распространенного рака простаты. Онкол журн 2011;4:76−85.
Review
For citations:
Demeshko P.D., Sukonko O.G., Krasny S.A. THE ROLE OF BONE SCINTIGRAPHY IN DETECTION OF BONE METASTASES OF PROSTATE CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. Cancer Urology. 2012;8(4):70-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-4-70-76