Multicenter non-interventional study of prevalence of homologous recombination gene mutations and approaches to treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Russia (ADAM)
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-2-87-100
Abstract
Background. Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers of men. In 2022, 48,025 new PCa cases and 12,896 deaths from the disease were reported in Russia. Metastatic castration-resistant PCa still is one of the common causes of death in men.
Aim. To evaluate prevalence of homologous recombination repair gene (HRR) mutations in patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa in Russia and to identify differences in clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with these mutations and without them.
Materials and methods. The study included 329 patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa from 20 centers. Patients underwent molecular genetic analysis using next-generation sequencing to identify mutations in 14 HRR genes. The mutation status was determined in 3 routine laboratories and further validated in a central independent laboratory.
Results. The HRR gene mutations were detected in 59 (19.28 %) of 329 patients. The most common were ATM mutations – in 14 (4.57 %), BRCA2 – in 14 (4.57 %), BRCA1 – in 6 (1.96 %). All the patients received first-line therapy, with newgeneration antiandrogens and taxanes being used most frequently. The patients with HRR gene mutations had nearly
1.5 times lower median of progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy: 12.8 months vs. 20.8 months in patients without mutations (p = 0.048). There was statistically significant difference in PFS between the observed groups with first-line therapy depending on the treatment group. In patients of general group having been treated with new-generation antiandrogen therapy, the median of PFS was 22 months, while in patients who had received taxanes it was 8.22 months (p <0.05). In patients with HRR gene mutations having been treated with first-line antiandrogenes of novel generation, the median of PFS was 20.5 months, while in patients without mutations the PFS median was 23.1 months (p = 0.14). In patients with mutations and having been treated with first-line taxanes, the PFS median was 6.15 months, while in patients without mutations it was 8.55 months (p = 0.4).
Conclusion. In our ADAM study in the Russian population, the proportion of carriers of the HRR gene mutations was slightly lower (19.28 %) than that reported in published randomized trials. There is also a different distribution structure and frequency of the most frequent mutations. Patients with the HRR gene mutations exhibited worse PFS rates and more aggressive course of the disease, which requires a special approach to treatment of this group of patients.
Keywords
About the Authors
B. Ya. AlekseevRussian Federation
Build. 1, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425;
11 Volokolamskoe Shosse, Moscow 125080
Yu. V. Anzhiganova
Russian Federation
16 1st Smolenskaya St., Krasnoyarsk 660133
A. V. Sultanbaev
Russian Federation
73/1 Oktyabrya Prospekt, Ufa 450054
A. A. Bystrov
Russian Federation
27 Istra, Moscow Region 143515
A. S. Orlov
Russian Federation
29 Soboleva St., Yekaterinburg 620036
G. V. Gopp
Russian Federation
42 Blyukhera St., Chelyabinsk 454087
A. V. Kopyltsov
Russian Federation
9/1 Zavertyaeva St., Omsk 644013
A. V. Lykov
Russian Federation
12 Shiller St., Tyumen 625048
V. A. Atduev
Russian Federation
2 Nizhne-Volzhskaya Naberezhnaya, Nizhny Novgorod 603001
G. N. Alekseeva
Russian Federation
59 Russkaya St., Vladivostok 690105
L. M. Rodygin
Russian Federation
lit. A, 68A Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy, Saint Petersburg 197758
S. A. Varlamov
Russian Federation
110k Zmeinogorsky Trakt, Barnaul 656045
A. V. Shestakov
Russian Federation
8 Sosenskiy Stan St., Kommunarka, Moscow 108814
M. R. Maturov
Russian Federation
2 Shafiyev St., Ufa 450083
M. F. Urmantsev
Russian Federation
2 Shafiyev St., Ufa 450083
L. V. Lankina
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 1 Novogireevskaya St., Moscow 111123
E. L. Parsadanova
Russian Federation
3 Gorky St., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk 693010
V. Yu. Startsev
Russian Federation
2 Litovskaya St., Saint Petersburg 194100
O. V. Vedrova
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 21 1st Krasnogvardeisky Proezd, Moscow 123112
S. Yu. Andreev
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 21 1st Krasnogvardeisky Proezd, Moscow 123112
A. A. Perevoshchikov
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 21 1st Krasnogvardeisky Proezd, Moscow 123112
O. A. Mailyan
Russian Federation
3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284
A. S. Kalpinskiy
Russian Federation
3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284
References
1. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2022 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: А.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, A.O. Shakhzadova, I.V. Lisichnikova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2023. 275 p. (In Russ.).
2. Achard V., Putora P.M., Omlin A. et al. Metastatic prostate cancer: treatment options. Oncology 2022;100(1):48–59. DOI: 10.1159/000519861
3. Petrylak D.P., Tangen C.M., Hussain M.H. et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351(15):1513–20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041318
4. Tannock I.F., Osoba D., Stockler M.R. Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone for symptomatic hormoneresistant prostate cancer: a Canadian randomized trial with palliative end points. J Clin Oncol 1996;14(6):1756–64. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1756
5. Tannock I.F., de Wit R., Berry W.R. et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351(15):1502–12. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040720
6. De Bono J.S., Oudard S., Ozguroglu M. et al. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomized openlabel trial. Lancet 2010;376(9747):1147–54. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61389X
7. FDA approved enzalutamide. Reference ID 4291091. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/203415s014lbl.pdf
8. Ryan C.J., Smith M.R., de Bono J.S. et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 2013;368(2):138–48. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096
9. FDA approved abiraterone acetate. Reference ID 2939553 Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/202379lbl.pdf
10. Parker C., Nilsson S., Heinrich D. et al. Alpha emitter radium223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;369(3):213–23. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1213755
11. Sartor O., de Bono J., Chi K.N. et al. Lutetium177PSMA617 for metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2021;385(12):1091–103. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107322
12. Hussain M., Mateo J., Fizazi K. et al. Survival with olaparib in metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;383(24):2345–57. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022485
13. De Bono J., Mateo J., Fizazi K. et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382(22):2091–102. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911440
14. Abida W., Campbell D., Patnaik A. et al. Rucaparib for the treatment of metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer associated with a DNA damage repair gene alteration: final results from the phase 2 TRITON2 study. Eur Urol 2023;84(3):321–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.021
15. Chi K.N., Rathkopf D., Smith M.R. et al. Niraparib and abiraterone acetate for metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023;41(18):3339–51. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01649
16. De Bono J.S., Mehra N., Scagliotti G.V. et al. Talazoparib monotherapy in metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer with DNA repair alterations (TALAPRO1): an openlabel, phase 2 trial [published correction appears in Lancet Oncol 2022;23(5):e207] [published correction appears in Lancet Oncol 2022;23(6):e249]. Lancet Oncol 2021;22(9):1250–64. DOI: 10.1016/S14702045(21)003764
17. Agarwal N., Azad A.A., Carles J. et al. Talazoparib plus enzalutamide in men with firstline metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (TALAPRO2): a randomised, placebocontrolled, phase 3 trial [published correction appears in Lancet 2023;402(10398):290]. Lancet 2023;402(10398):291–303. DOI: 10.1016/S01406736(23)010553
18. Castro E., Mateo J., Olmos D., de Bono J.S. Targeting DNA repair: the role of PARP inhibition in the treatment of castrationresistant prostate cancer. Cancer J 2016;22(5):353–6. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000219
19. Chung J.H., Dewal N., Sokol E. et al. Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling of primary and metastatic prostate tumors. JCO Precis Oncol 2019;3: PO.18.00283. DOI: 10.1200/PO.18.00283
20. Cui M., Gao X.S., Gu X. et al. BRCA2 mutations should be screened early and routinely as markers of poor prognosis: evidence from 8,988 patients with prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2017;8(25):40222–32. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16712
21. Maughan B.L., Munlde S., NematianSamani M. et al. Survival outcomes of APA as a starting treatment: impact in realworld patients with mCSPC (OASIS). J Clin Oncol 2024;42(4_suppl):65. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.65
Review
For citations:
Alekseev B.Ya., Anzhiganova Yu.V., Sultanbaev A.V., Bystrov A.A., Orlov A.S., Gopp G.V., Kopyltsov A.V., Lykov A.V., Atduev V.A., Alekseeva G.N., Rodygin L.M., Varlamov S.A., Shestakov A.V., Maturov M.R., Urmantsev M.F., Lankina L.V., Parsadanova E.L., Startsev V.Yu., Vedrova O.V., Andreev S.Yu., Perevoshchikov A.A., Mailyan O.A., Kalpinskiy A.S. Multicenter non-interventional study of prevalence of homologous recombination gene mutations and approaches to treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Russia (ADAM). Cancer Urology. 2024;20(2):87-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-2-87-100