Structure of residual metastases in patients with advanced testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors and incomplete serological and radiological response to chemotherapy
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-1-112-120
Abstract
Objective: to analyze histological structure and identify predictors of detecting malignant non-seminoma in residual tumor masses obtained from patients with testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (TNSGCTs) who had not achieved complete serological and radiological response to chemotherapy (CT).
Materials and methods. This study included 96 out of 703 patients with TNSGCTs (13.7 %) operated on in N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology. The inclusion criteria were as follows: verified advanced TNSGCT, elevated levels of alpha-fetoprotein and/or chorionic gonadotropin at the moment of CT initiation, at least 3 completed courses of first-line or second-line platinum-based CT, residual tumor foci after CT visualized with radiological methods, alpha-fetoprotein >7.29 IU/mL or chorionic gonadotropin >5 mIU/mL 3 weeks after the initiation of the last CT course, and surgery after CT. Histological examination of the primary tumors demonstrated that they contained elements of seminoma (n = 14; 14.6 %), teratoma (n = 29; 30.2 %), choriocarcinoma in (n = 23; 23.9 %), embryonal carcinoma (n = 45; 46.9 %), and yolk sac (n = 18; 18.8 %). All study participants received first-line CT; 58 of them (60.4 %) also received second-line CT. All patients underwent surgery after CT, including retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) (n = 96; 100 %) and excision of extra-retroperitoneal lesions (n = 8; 8.3 %).
Results. Histological examination of excised retroperitoneal masses showed that they contained areas of necrosis and fibrosis (n = 25; 26.0 %), teratoma (n = 29; 30.2 %), and viable malignant non-seminoma (n = 42; 43.8 %). There was a strong positive correlation between the existence of residual malignant non-seminomatous components in retroperitoneal masses and presence of choriocarcinoma (r = 0.300; р = 0.004), as well as the absence of embryonal carcinoma in the primary tumor (r = –0.300; р = 0.004), invasion of retroperitoneal metastases into major vessels and/or adjacent organs (r = 0.243; р = 0.017), and second-line CT prior to RPLND (r = 0.413; р <0.0001). Patients having ≥3 risk factors were significantly more likely to have residual malignant non-seminoma in retroperitoneal masses than patients who had 0–2 risk factors (73.5 % vs 27.3 %; р <0.0001). Excised residual extra-retroperitoneal masses contained areas of necrosis and fibrosis (n = 3; 37.5 %), teratoma (n = 1; 12.5 %), and malignant non-seminoma (n = 4; 62.5 %). Concordant structure of retroperitoneal and extra-retroperitoneal lesions was observed in 4 patients (50.0 %).
Conclusion. Malignant non-seminomas were detected in 43.8 % of retroperitoneal and 62.5 % of extra-retroperitoneal residual tumorsremoved after CT in patients with advanced TNSGCTs and incomplete serological and radiological response. Discordant structure of metastases at different locations was observed in 50 % of patients. Our finding can be used to select candidates for surgical excision of residual tumors among these patients.
About the Authors
M. I. VolkovaRussian Federation
Mariya I. Volkova
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478,
Build. 1, 2/1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993
G. A. Arakelyan
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478,
2 Bol’shaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow 119435
A. V. Klimov
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
I. A. Fainstein
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Yu. S. Sergeev
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
M. Yu. Fedyanin
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
A. A. Rumyantsev
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
A. A. Tryakin
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
A. S. Tyulyandin
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
V. B. Matveev
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
I. S. Stilidi
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
References
1. Steyerberg E.W., Keizer H.J., Fossa S.D. et al. Prediction of residual retroperitoneal mass histology after chemotherapy for metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: multivariate analysis of individual patient data from six study groups. J Clin Oncol 1995;13(5):1177–87. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1177.
2. Eggener S.E., Carver B.S., Loeb S. et al. Pathologic findings and clinical outcome of patients undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after multiple chemotherapy regimens for metastatic testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer 2007;109(3):528–35. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22440.
3. Wood D.P.Jr, Herr H.W., Motzer R.J. et al. Surgical resection of solitary metastases after chemotherapy in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors and elevated serum tumor markers. Cancer 1992;70(9):2354–7. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19921101)70:9<2354::aid-cncr2820700924>3.0.co;2-u.
4. Murphy B.R., Breeden E.S., Donohue J.P. et al. Surgical salvage of chemorefractory germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 1993;11(2):324–9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.2.324.
5. Eastham J.A., Wilson T.G., Russell C. et al. Surgical resection in patients withnonseminomatous germ cell tumor who fail to normalize serum tumor markers after chemotherapy. Urology 1994;43(1):74–80. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80269-6.
6. CooganC.L., Foster R.S., Rowland R.G. et al. Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is effective therapy in selected patients with elevated tumor markers after primary chemotherapy alone. Urology 1997;50(6):957–62. DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00458-5.
7. Ravi R., Ong J., Oliver R.T. et al. Surgery as salvage therapy in chemotherapy-resistant nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. Br J Urol 1998;81(6):884–8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00346.x.
8. Albers P., Ganz A., Hannig E. et al. Salvage surgery of chemorefractory germ cell tumors with elevated tumor markers. J Urol 2000;164(2):381–4.
9. Habuchi T., Kamoto T., Hara I. et al. Factors that influence the results of salvage surgery in patients with chemorefractory germ cell carcinomas with elevated tumor markers. Cancer 2003;98(8):1635–42. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11711.
10. Beck S.D., Foster R.S., Bihrle R. et al. Outcome analysis for patients with elevated serum tumor markers at postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(25):6149–56. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.684.
11. Ong T.A., Winkler M.H., Savage P.M. et al. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after chemotherapy in patients with elevated tumour markers: indications, histopathology and outcome. BJU Int 2008;102(2):198–202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07533.x.
12. Steiner H., Berg B., Stöhr B. et al. Prediction of retroperitoneal histology in metastatic nonseminomatous testicular cancer patients after chemotherapy based on clinical and radiological parameters. Curr Urol 2010;4:142–51. DOI: 10.1159/000253441
13. Dieckmann K.P., Simonsen-Richter H., Kulejewski M. et al. Serum tumour markers in testicular germ cell tumours: frequencies of elevated levels and extents of marker elevation are significantly associated with clinical parameters and with response to treatment. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:5030349. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5030349.
14. Tryakin A.A., Fedyanin M.Yu., Bulanov A.A. et al. Treatment of patients with poor risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors at advanced stages. Zlokachestvennye opuholi = Malignant Tumours 2017;(3):23–9. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2017-3-23-29.
15. Van der Gaast A., Hoekstra J.W., Croles J.J. et al. Elevated serum tumor markers in patients with testicular cancer after induction chemotherapy due to a reservoir of markers in cystic ifferentiated mature teratoma. J Urol 1991;145(4):829–31. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38465-3.
16. Beck S.D., Patel M.I., Sheinfeld J. Tumor marker levels in post-chemotherapy cystic masses: clinical implications for patients with germ cell tumors. J Urol 2004;171(1):168–71. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000099714.16082.78.
17. Hartmann J.T., Candelaria M., Kuczyk M.A. et al. Comparison of histological results from the resection of residual masses at different sites after chemotherapy for metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. Eur J Cancer 1997;33(6):843–7. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00517-5.
Review
For citations:
Volkova M.I., Arakelyan G.A., Klimov A.V., Fainstein I.A., Sergeev Yu.S., Fedyanin M.Yu., Rumyantsev A.A., Tryakin A.A., Tyulyandin A.S., Matveev V.B., Stilidi I.S. Structure of residual metastases in patients with advanced testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors and incomplete serological and radiological response to chemotherapy. Cancer Urology. 2022;18(1):112-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-1-112-120