Changing paradigm of immunooncology in advanced kidney cancer: nivolumab and ipilimumab combination in the first line therapy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Until now selection of the 1st line therapy for advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma was determined by patients distribution into favorable/ intermediate or poor prognosis groups. In the favorable/ intermediate prognostic groups agents of choice included antiangiogenic substances such as bevacizumab (in combination with interferon-alpha), sunitinib, andpazopanib, which had demonstrated only progression-free survival benefit comparing with interferon-alpha in registration studies; in the poor prognosis group the only treatment option was mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor temsirolimus which had improved overall survival comparing with interferon-alpha. However about 75 % of advanced renal cell carcinoma patients have intermediate or poor prognosis. Only 2 randomized trials investigated systemic therapy in this cohort of patients, CABOSUN and CheckMate 214. The results of the randomized phase III study CheckMate 214 have demonstrated a significant advantage of overall survival and objective response rate in previously untreated patients of intermediate/poor prognostic groups who were randomizedfor combined immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab comparing with sunitinib independently of PD-L1 expression level. Owing to the achieved data combined immunotherapy became a new standard of the first-line therapy in advanced renal-cell carcinoma patients with intermediate and poor prognosis.

About the authors

V. B. Matveev

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: vsevolodmatveev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7748-9527

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478

Russian Federation

M. I. Volkova

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: mivolkova6@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7754-6624

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478

Russian Federation

A. S. Olshanskaya

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia ; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: anny9191@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0389-564X

Department of Oncology

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997

Russian Federation

References

  1. Antonia SJ, López-Martin JA, Bendell J, et al. Nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:883-95.
  2. Cella, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib (CheckMate 214): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb; 20(2): 297-310.
  3. Choueiri TK, Figueroa DJ, Fay AP, et al. Correlation of PD-L1 tumor expression and treatment outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib or pazopanib: results from COMPARZ, a randomized controlled trial. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:1071-7.
  4. Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P, et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet 2007;370:2103-11.
  5. Escudier B, Szczylik C, Hutson TE, et al. Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27: 1280-9.
  6. Escudier, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019 Feb 21. pii: mdz056. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz056. [Epub ahead of print].
  7. Hammers HJ, Plimack ER, Infante JR, et al. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3851-8.
  8. Hellmann MD, Rizvi NA, Goldman JW, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 012): results of an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:31-41.
  9. Hodi FS, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:1558-68.
  10. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, et al. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2271-81.
  11. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015;373:23-34.
  12. Mc Dermott, et al.,Treatment-free survival (TFS) after discontinuation of first-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) or sunitinib (SUN) in intention-to-treat (ITT) and IMDC favorable-risk patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from CheckMate 214 Journal of Clinical Oncology 37, no. 7_suppl (March 1 2019) 564-564.Published online February 26, 2019.
  13. Motzer et al. N Engl J Med 2018.
  14. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1803-13.
  15. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, et al. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007;356:115-24.
  16. Motzer, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 5; 378(14): 1277-1290.
  17. Rothrock N.E., Jensen S.E., Beaumont J., Abernethy A., Jacobsen P.B., Syrjala K.L., Cella D. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) –Kidney Symptom Index 19 (NCCN-FACT FKSI-19), 2013 Jul-Aug; 16 (5):789-96.
  18. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Kidney Cancer, version 3.2019.
  19. Opdivo Prescribing Information. Opdivo U.S. Product Information. Last updated: January 27, 2017. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
  20. Rini BI, Halabi S, Rosenberg JE, et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa compared with interferon alfa monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: CALGB 90206. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:5422-8.
  21. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J, et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1061-8.
  22. Tannir , et al. Outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) who discontinued (DC) first-line nivolumab + ipilimumab (N+I) or sunitinib (S) due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in CheckMate 214, Journal of Clinical Oncology 37, no. 7_suppl (March 1 2019) 581-581.Published online February 26, 2019.
  23. Tannir, et al. Thirty-month follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial of first-line nivolumab + ipilimumab (N+I) or sunitinib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl.7S; abstr.547).
  24. Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:122-33.
  25. Yang JC, Hughes M, Kammula U, et al. Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4 antibody) causes regression of metastatic renal cell cancer associated with enteritis and hypophysitis. J Immunother 2007;30:825-30.
  26. Yervoy (ipilimumab) injection for intravenous use (prescribing information). Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2017.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-36986 от  21.07.2009.