The problem of early continence recovery after radical prostatectomy
- Authors: Kachmazov A.A.1, Keshishev N.G.1, Ognerubova I.N.1, Grigor’eva M.V.1, Kazachenko A.V.1, Alekseev B.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: Vol 13, No 4 (2017)
- Pages: 70-78
- Section: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. PROSTATE CANCER
- Published: 30.12.2017
- URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/768
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2017-13-4-70-78
- ID: 768
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. The highest rate of incontinence after radical prostatectomy (RP) is observed in the first 2–6 months after surgery. In order to decrease the period of incontinence, virous surgical methods aimed at preservation and reconstruction of structures participating in the mechanism of urine retention has been developed and improved.
The study objective is to evaluate effectiveness of an original method of formation of an urethral anastomosis in the early continence recovery.
Materials and methods. Data on 126 patients who underwent retropubic RP were analyzed. Depending on the method of urethral anastomosis formation, patients were divided into 2 groups: in the 1st group (n = 52) the patients underwent PR with urethra suspension m. levator ani, in the 2nd (n = 74) – standard RP. In the 1st group, 6 ligatures were applied to the anterior and posterior urethra walls: at the 12 and 6 hour projections through the mucosa, submucosa, and smooth muscle; at the 10, 2, 4, and 8 hour projections – more laterally with capture of the m. levator ani medial margins. Continence recovery was evaluated on days 1, 7, and 14 after urinary catheter removal and then at days 30, 90, 180, and 365 after RP. The criteria of continence were absence of urine leakage at rest and during physical activity and a necessity of using a safety liner.
Results. There weren’t any significant differences at day 1 after urinary catheter removal between the two groups (р > 0.05). In the 1st group, continence values at days 30, 90, and 180 after RP were significantly higher (57.7, 69.2, and 71.1 %, respectively) compared to the 2nd group (35.1, 41.9, and 51.3 %, respectively) (р <0.05).
Conclusion. Results of this work show significant benefits of RP with urethra suspension m. levator ani compared to standard RP per continence recovery criteria at days 7, 14, 30, 90, and 180 after the surgery. The technique of urethra suspension m. levator ani is easy to perform and ensures early continence recovery after RP.About the authors
A. A. Kachmazov
N.N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: kac.68@mail.ru
Build. 1, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationN. G. Keshishev
N.N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Build. 1, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationI. N. Ognerubova
N.N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Build. 1, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationM. V. Grigor’eva
N.N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Build. 1, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationA. V. Kazachenko
N.N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Build. 1, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationB. Ya. Alekseev
N.N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Build. 1, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationReferences
Supplementary files

