Органосохраняющее хирургическое лечение пациента с синхронным двусторонним морфологически бивариантным почечно-клеточным раком с опухолевым тромбозом нижней полой вены и конкрементом лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента: клиническое наблюдение

Рак почки занимает 3-е место в структуре онкоурологических заболеваний. В 4–10 % случаев определяется опухолевый венозный тромбоз нижней полой вены. Описаны единичные случаи органосохраняющего хирургического лечения больных раком почки, осложненным опухолевым венозным тромбозом. В статье представлен редкий клинический случай синхронного двустороннего морфологически бивариантного рака почек с опухолевым тромбозом левой почечной вены, периренального отдела нижней полой вены, конкрементом пиелоуретрального сегмента правого мочеточника.

1. Globocan (IARC) 2020. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/29-Kidney-fact-sheet.pdf.

2. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2021 году. Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2022. 239 с.

3. Zhang C., Li X., Hao H. et al. The correlation between size of renal cell carcinoma and its histopathological characteristics: a single center study of 1867 renal cell carcinoma cases. BJU Int 2012; 110(11 Pt B):E481–5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11173.x

4. Van Poppel H., Da Pozzo L., Albrecht W. et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011;59(4):543–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013

5. Scosyrev E., Messing E.M., Sylvester R. et al. Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904. Eur Urol 2014;65(2):372–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.044

6. Fergany A.F., Hafez K.S., Novick A.C. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol 2000;163(2):442–5.

7. Patel S.H., Uzzo R.G., Larcher A. et al. Oncologic and functional outcomes of radical and partial nephrectomy in pt3a pathologically upstaged renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. Clin Ge-nitourin Cancer 2020;18(6):e723–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.05.002

8. Kolla S.B., Ercole C., Spiess P.E. et al. Nephron-sparing surgery for pathological stage T3b renal cell carcinoma confined to the renal vein. BJU Int 2010;106(10):1494–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09293.x

9. Yim K., Aron M., Rha K.H. et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for clinical T3a renal masses: a multicenter analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2021;7(5):1107–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.011

10. Woldu S.L., Barlow L.J., Patel T. et al. Single institutional experience with nephron-sparing surgery for pathologic stage T3bNxM0 renal cell carcinoma confined to the renal vein. Urology 2010;76(3):639–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.073

11. Marra G., Gontero P., Brattoli M. et al. Is imperative partial nephrectomy feasible for kidney cancer with venous thrombus involvement? Outcomes of 42 cases and matched pair analysis with a large radical nephrectomy cohort. Urol Oncol 2018;36(7):339.e1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.04.007

12. Morgan T.N., Dai J.C., Kusin S. et al. Clinical outcomes of robotic assisted partial nephrectomy for pathologic T3a renal masses with venous tumor thrombus. Urology 2022;159:120–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.054

13. Zisman A., Pantuck A.J., Wieder J. et al. Risk group assessment and clinical outcome algorithm to predict the natural history of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(23):4559–66. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.05.111

14. Leibovich B.C., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C. et al. Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer 2003;97(7):1663–71. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11234

15. Eisen T., Frangou E., Oza B. et al. Adjuvant sorafenib for renal cell carcinoma at intermediate or high risk of relapse: results from the SORCE randomized phase III intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:4064–75. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.01800

16. Gross-Goupil M., Kwon T., Eto M. et al. Axitinib versus placebo as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase III, randomized ATLAS trial. Ann Oncol 2018;29(12):2371–8. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy454

17. Haas N.B., Manola J., Uzzo R.G. et al. Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016;387(10032):2008–16. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00559-6

18. Motzer R.J., Haas N.B., Donskov F. et al. Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant pazopanib versus placebo after nephrectomy in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(35):3916–23. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.5324

19. Staehler M., Motzer R.J., George D.J. et al. Adjuvant sunitinib in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma: safety, therapy management, and patient-reported outcomes in the S-TRAC trial. Ann Oncol 2018;29(10):2098–104. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy329

20. Powles T., Tomczak P., Park S.H. et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as post-nephrectomy adjuvant therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-564): 30-month follow-up analysis of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022;23(9):1133–44. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00487-9