Radical prostatectomy in the Russian Federation: features of perioperative management and nuances of technical execution
- Authors: Gadzhiev N.K.1, Rybalchenko V.A.1, Dzhalilov I.B.1, Shkarupa D.D.1, Shkarupa A.G.1, Semeniakin I.V.2, Petrov S.B.3
-
Affiliations:
- N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint Petersburg State University
- Medsi group
- Scientific Research Center of Urology, I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: Vol 19, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 45-59
- Section: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. PROSTATE CANCER
- Published: 15.11.2023
- URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1681
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2023-19-3-45-59
- ID: 1681
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Despite constant improvements in radical prostatectomy technique, some questions on standardization of both perioperative management stages and surgical intervention itself remain.
We conducted an anonymous online survey of 45 oncological urologists from 15 regions of the Russian Federation who are actively involved in the surgical treatment of patients with prostate cancer.
According to the results of the survey, there is huge variability associated, to a great extent, with equipment availability in clinics and the lack of sufficient evidence-based information in some matters of perioperative management.
A detailed study of each step of surgical treatment, clinical trials, and involvement of professional societies will contribute to the standardization of perioperative management of patients and radical prostatectomy technique.
About the authors
N. K. Gadzhiev
N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: nariman.gadjiev@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6255-0193
Nariman K. Gadzhiev.
154 Naberezhnaya Reki Fontanki, Saint Petersburg 190103
Russian FederationV. A. Rybalchenko
N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint Petersburg State University
Email: vr9650765236@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3086-6457
154 Naberezhnaya Reki Fontanki, Saint Petersburg 190103
Russian FederationI. B. Dzhalilov
N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint Petersburg State University
Email: imrandzhalilov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8899-0798
154 Naberezhnaya Reki Fontanki, Saint Petersburg 190103
Russian FederationD. D. Shkarupa
N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint Petersburg State University
Email: shkarupa.dmitry@mail.ru
154 Naberezhnaya Reki Fontanki, Saint Petersburg 190103
Russian FederationA. G. Shkarupa
N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint Petersburg State University
Email: shag_doc@mail.ru
154 Naberezhnaya Reki Fontanki, Saint Petersburg 190103
Russian FederationI. V. Semeniakin
Medsi group
Email: dr.semeniakin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3246-7337
3A Gruzinskiy Pereulok, Moscow 123056
Russian FederationS. B. Petrov
Scientific Research Center of Urology, I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: petrov-uro@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3460-3427
6-8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022
Russian FederationReferences
- Global Cancer Observatory, 2023. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/.
- State of oncological care in Russia in 2021. Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Sta-rinskiy, A.O. Shachzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena - filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2022. 239 p. (In Russ.).
- NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2023. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/login?ReturnURL = https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physi-cian_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf.
- Young H.H. Conservative perineal prostatectomy. A presentation of new instruments and technic. J Am Med Assoc 1903;41(17):999-1009.
- Young H.H. VIII. Conservative perineal prostatectomy: the results of two years' experience and report of seventy-five cases. Ann Surg 1905;41(4):549-57.
- Young H.H. The Cure of cancer of the prostate by radical perineal prostatectomy (prostato-seminal vesiculectomy): history, literature and statistics of young's operation. J Urol 1945;53(1):188-252.
- Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1948;59(3):267-80. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69374-1
- Reiner W.G., Walsh P.C. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini's plexus during radical retropubic surgery. J Urol 1979;121(2):198-200. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56718-x
- Walsh P.C. Radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostatic carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 1980;7(3):583-91.
- Walsh P.C., Donker P.J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982;128(3):492-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53012-8
- Lange P.H., Reddy P.K. Technical nuances and surgical results of radical retropubic prostatectomy in 150 patients. J Urol 1987;138(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43143-0
- Schuessler W.W., Schulam P.G., Clayman R.V. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997;50(6):854-7. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00543-8
- Guillonneau B., Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 2000;163(2):418-22. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67890-1
- Rassweiler J., Sentker L., Seemann O. et al. Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 2001;40(1):54-64. doi: 10.1159/000049749
- Bollens R., Vanden Bossche M., Roumeguere T. et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 2001;40(1):65-9. doi: 10.1159/000049750
- Menon M., Tewari A., Peabody O.J. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31(4):701-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2004.06.011
- Stolzenburg J.U., Rabenalt R., Do M. et al. Intrafascial nervesparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008;53(5):931-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.047
- Rocco F., Camignani L., Acquati P. et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2006;175(6):2201-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00262-X
- Patel V.R., Coelcho R.F., Kenneth P.J. et al. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 2009;56(3):472-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.007
- Perepechay V.A., Medvedev V.L., Dimitriadi S.N. Optimization of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Onkouro-logiya = Cancer Urology 2010;6(1):39-44. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2010-6-1-39-44
- Perepechay V.A., Dimitriadi S.N., Alekseev B.Ya. Technical characteristics of radical prostatectomy for early continence recovery. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2011;7(1):37-44. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2011-7-1-37-44
- Tolkach Yu.V., Petrov S.B., Schelin S., Rezvancev M.V. A new method of bladder neck reconstruction during the radical prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer. Onko-urologiya = Cancer Urology 2011;7(3):99-106. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2011-7-3-99-106
- Kostyuk I.P., Vasilyev L.A., Krestyaninov S.S., Krasikov D.N. Urethra-sparing prostatectomy: indications, surgical technique, functional and oncologic results. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2014;10(4):62-69. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2014-104-62-69
- Nosov A.K., Reva S.A., Berkut M.V., Petrov S.B. Early recovery program in the radical surgical treatment of patients with prostate cancer: experience of the specialized hospital. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2016;12(4):60-9. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2016-12-4-60-69
- Sikhvardt I.A., Alekseev B.Ya., Leonov O.V. et al. Surgical technique stabilization of urethrovesical anastomosis in order to improve the results of early recovery of urine retention after retropubic prostatectomy. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2018;14(4):68-78. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-4-68-78
- Yurgel Yu.N., Alekseev B.Ya., Kopyltsov E.I. et al. An original surgical method for the formation of fascial duplication in the elimination of damage to the anterior rectal wall during prostatectomy. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2021;17(1):54-61. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-1-54-61
- Costello A.J. Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care. Nat Rev Urol 2020;17(3):177-88. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0287-y
- Axel E.M., Matveev V.B. Statistics of malignant tumors of urinary and male urogenital organs in Russia and the countries of the former USSR. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2019;15(2):15-24. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-2-15-24
- Malignant tumors in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena - filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2018. 250 p. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files

