Prerequisites for lithogenesis after radical cystectomy: literature review
- Authors: Prosyannikov M.Y.1, Kaprin A.D.2,3, Apolikhin O.I.1, Alekseev B.Y.2,4, Sivkov A.V.1, Shevchuk I.M.1, Voytko D.A.1, Anokhin N.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
- National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
- Medical Institute of Continuing Education, Moscow State University of Food Production
- Issue: Vol 18, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 190-197
- Section: REVIEWS
- Published: 14.08.2022
- URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1552
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-2-190-197
- ID: 1552
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Recently, there has been a worldwide increase in the incidence of bladder cancer. Improved morphological diagnostics, increased surgical activity and availability of chemotherapy allowed reducing the one-year mortality rate and increasing the five-year survival rate. However, at the same time, there was a struggle with complications arising after the treatment. According to the world and domestic literature, it is noted that with an increase in life expectancy in patients who underwent radical cystectomy with intestinal urine derivation, an almost twofold increase in the frequency of complications, including the formation of urinary stones, is recorded. Previous studies have shown that about 60 % of the stones identified in this category of patients are infectious, and 40 % formed because of metabolic disorders, which have their own characteristics with different types of urine derivation. In this work, we present an overview of the predisposition for stone formation in patients who underwent cystectomy for musculoinvasive bladder cancer, taking into account the type of urine derivation.
Keywords
About the authors
M. Yu. Prosyannikov
N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: prosyannikov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3635-5244
Mihail Yur’evich Prosyannikov
Russian FederationA. D. Kaprin
National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8784-8415
3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284; 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198
Russian FederationO. I. Apolikhin
N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0206-043X
Build. 4, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationB. Ya. Alekseev
National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Medical Institute of Continuing Education, Moscow State University of Food Production
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3398-4128
3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284; 11 Volokolamskoe Shosse, Moscow 125080
Russian FederationA. V. Sivkov
N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8852-6485
Build. 4, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationI. M. Shevchuk
N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6877-0437
Build. 4, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationD. A. Voytko
N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1292-1651
Build. 4, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationN. V. Anokhin
N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4341-4276
Build. 4, 51 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow 105425
Russian FederationReferences
- Clinical guidelines of the European Society of Urologists. Urolithiasis. Available at: http://uroweb.org/guideline/ urolithiasis. (In Russ.)].
- Clinical guidelines of the American Society of Urologists. Urolithiasis. Available at: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/guidelines/kidney-stones-surgicalmanagement-guideline. (In Russ.).
- Petrov S.B., Levkovsky N.S., Korol V.D., Parshin A.G. Radical cystectomy as the main method of treatment of bladder cancer. Prakticheskaya onkologiya = Practical Oncology 2003;4(4):225–30. (In Russ.).
- State of oncological care in Russia in 2019. Eds.: А.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, A.О. Shachzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2020. 239 p. (In Russ.).
- Vasilyev O.N., Perepechay V.A., Ryzhkin A.V. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: early and late postoperative complications. Vestnik urologii = Urology Herald 2019;7(2):24–50. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2019-7-2-24-50
- Madersbacher S., Schmidt J., Eberle J.M. et al. Long-term outcome of ileal conduit diversion. J Urol 2003;69(3):985–90. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000051462.45388.14
- Holmes D.G., Thrasher J.B., Park G.Y. et al. Long-term complications related to the modified Indiana pouch. Urology 2002;60(4):603–6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01945-3
- Atduev V.A., Abramov D.V., Stroganov A.B. et al. Stone formation in intestinal uric reservoirs. Meditsinskiy al’manakh = Medical Almanac 2008;(5):120–1. (In Russ.).
- Turk T.M., Koleski F.C., Albala D.M. Incidence of urolithiasis in cystectomy patients after intestinal conduitor continent urinary diversion. World J Urol 1999;17(5):305–7. doi: 10.1007/s003450050151
- Gonzalez M.I., Zubieta M.E., Jaunarena J. et al. Functional and objective results of urinary undiversions in oncologic patients. Urology 2018;120:244–7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.030
- Clinical recommendations of the Ministry of Health of Russia. Bladder cancer, 2020. Available at: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/rak_mochevogo_puzyrja.pdf. (In Russ.).
- Urine bladder – cancer formation. Electronic resource. Available at: https://medbe.ru/materials/mochevoy-puzyr-onkologiya-i-rak/. (In Russ.).
- Besancenez A., Bagros P., Jankowski J.M., Lanson Y. Recto-sigmoid carcinoma after uretero-sigmoidostomy. One case, with a review of the literature (author’ transl). J Urol Nephrol (Paris) 1976;82(6): 447–58.
- Khokhlov M.A. Ureterocutaneostomy and its relevance in the 21st century. Daydzhest urologii = Digest of Urology 2019;(4). Available at: https://www.uroweb.ru/news/ureterokutaneostomiya-i-ee-aktualnost-v21-veke. (In Russ.).
- Clark P.E., Stein J.P., Groshen S.G. et al. Radical cystectomy in the elderly: comparison of clinical outcomes between younger and older patients. Cancer 2005;104(1):36–43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21126
- Stein R., Hohenfellner M., Pahernik S. et al. Urinary diversion – approaches and consequences. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012;109(38):617–22. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0617
- Morgan T.M., Keegan K.A., Barocas D.A. et al. Predicting the probability of 90-day survival of elderly patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. J Urol 2011;186(3):829–34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.089
- Proskokov A.A., Darenkov S.P., Agabekyan A.A., Trofimchuk A.D. Current trends in the choice of urine derivation method in patients after radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Urologiya = Urology 2019;(6):120–4. (In Russ.).
- Lughezzani G., Sun M., Shariat S.F. et al. A population-based competing-risks analysis of the survival of patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 2011;117(1):103–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25345
- Froehner M., Brausi M.A., Herr H.W. et al. Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol 2009;56(3):443–54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.008
- Atduev V.A., Berezkina G.A., Stroganov A.B. et al. Derivation of urine into a heterotopic bladder. Indications and results. Meditsinskiy al’manakh = Medical Almanac 2008;(Special Issue):109–12. (In Russ.).
- Spitsyn I.M., Perepechai V.A., Kogan M.I. Heterotopic continental forms of urine derivation. Vestnik urologii = Urology Herald 2017;(1):63–70. (In Russ.).
- Matosyan S.R. Method of orthotopic small intestine plastic surgery of the bladder. Dis. ... candidate of medical sciences. Moscow, 2015. 156 p. (In Russ.).
- Bolenz C., Ho R., Nuss G.R. et al. Management of elderly patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: guideline concordance and predictors of overall survival. BJU Int 2010;106(9):1324–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09417.x
- Nam J.K., Kim T.N., Park S.W. et al. The Studer orthotopic neobladder: longterm (more than 10 years) functional outcomes, urodynamic features, and complications. Yonsei Med J 2013;54(3):690–5. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.3.690
- Sitdykova M.E., Zubkov A.Yu., Sitdykov E.N., Zubkov E.A. Long-term complications of enterocystoplasty, their prevention and treatment in patients after cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Kazan Medical Journal 2006;87(5):323–31. (In Russ.).
- Stier D.M., Greenfield S., Lubeck D.P. et al. Quantifying comorbidity in a diseasespecific cohort: adaptation of the total illness burden index to prostate cancer. Urology 1999;54(3):424–9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00203-4
- Semenyakin I.V. Surgical optimization of urine derivation after cystectomy. Dis. ... candidate of medical sciences. Moscow, 2014. 43 p. (In Russ.).
- Lagutin G.V. Endovideosurgery in the treatment of hydronephrosis in children. Dis. ... candidate of medical sciences. Moscow, 2019. 177 p. (In Russ.).
- Van der Aa F., Joniau S., van den Branden M., van Poppel H. Metabolic changes after urinary diversion. Adv Urol 2011; 2011:764325. doi: 10.1155/2011/764325
- Nazarov T.Kh. Modern aspects of pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis. Dis. ... doctor of medical sciences. Saint Petersburg, 2009. Available at: http://androurolog.com/sovremennye-aspekty-patogeneza-diag. (In Russ.).
- Bissada N.K., Herschorn S., Elzawahri A. et al. Urinary conduit formation using retubularized bowel from continent urinary diversion or intestinal augmentations: I. A multi-institutional experience. Urology 2004;64(3):485–7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.076
- Kamidono S., Oda Y., Ogawa T. Clinical study of urinary diversion. II: review of 41 ileocolic conduit cases, their complications and long term (6~9 years) follow-up Nishinihon. J Urol 1985;47(2):415–42.
- Vasdev N., Moon A., Thorpe A.C. Metabolic complications of urinary intestinal diversion. Indian J Urol 2013;29(4):310–5. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.120112
- Kawakita M., Arai Y., Shigeno C. et al. Bone demineralization following urinary intestinal diversion assessed by urinary Pyridium cross-links and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Urol 1996;156(2 Pt 1):355–9. doi: 10.1097/00005392-19960800000006
- Lim S. Metabolic acidosis. Acta Med Indones 2007;39(3):145–50.
- Kim K.H., Yoon H.S., Yoon H. et al. Risk factors for developing metabolic acidosis after radical cystectomy and ileal neobladder. PLoS One 2016; 11(7):e0158220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158220
- Cherniy V.I., Shlapak I.P., Georgiyants M.A. et al. Etiology, pathogenesis and intensive therapy of metabolic acidosis. Meditsina neotlozhnykh sostoyaniy = Emergency Medicine 2016;6(77):153–66. (In Russ.).
- Fujisawa M., Gotoh A., Hara I. et al. Diverse patterns of acid-base abnormalities associated with a modified sigmoid neobladder. Urol Res 2002;30(3):153–8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-002-0257-2
- Studer U.E., Danuser H., Merz V.W. et al. Experience in 100 patients with an ileal low pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment. J Urol 1995;154(1):49–56.
- Stroganov A.B. Clinical and experimental substantiation of the choice of the method of urine derivation and reconstruction of the urinary reservoir. Dis. ... doctor of medical sciences. Saratov, 2010. 34 p. (In Russ.).
- Fadeev V.A. The artificial bladder. Dis. ... doctor of medical sciences. Saint Petersburg, 2011. 46 p. (In Russ.).
- Kristjansson A., Davidsson T., Mansson W. Metabolic alterations at different levels of renal function following continent urinary diversion through colonic segments. J Urol 1997;157(6):2099–103.
- Qin S., Wang S., Wang X., Wang J. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the risk of urolithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97(35):e12092. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012092
- Krajewski W., Piszczek R., Krajewska M. et al. Urinary diversion metabolic complications underestimated problem. Adv Clin Exp Med 2014;23(4):633–8. doi: 10.17219/acem/28251
- Furrer M.A., Kiss B., Wüthrich P.Y. et al. Long-term outcwith an afferent tubular segment for heterotopic continent continent urinary diversion: a longitudinal single-centre study. Eur Urol Focus 2021;7(3):629–37. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.009
- Terai A., Ueda T., Kakehi Y. et al. Urinary calculi as a late complication of the Indiana continent urinary diversion: comparison with the Kock pouch procedure. J Urol 199;155(1):66–8.
Supplementary files

