Preview

Онкоурология

Расширенный поиск

Положительный хирургический край при радикальной позадилонной простатэктомии: частота, прогностические факторы, медикаментозная профилактика

https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2006-2-1-40-44

Полный текст:

Об авторах

С. Б. Петров
Военно-медицинская академия
Россия
Санкт-Петербург


С. А. Ракул
Военно-медицинская академия
Россия
Санкт-Петербург


Список литературы

1. Wingo P.A., Guest J.L., McGinnis L. et al. Patterns of inpatient surgeries for the top four cancers in the United States, National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1988–95 // Cancer Causes Control. — 2000. — V. 11, № 6. — P. 497–512.

2. Epstein J.I. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive // Amer. J. Surg. Path. — 1990. — V. 14, № 7 — P. 626–632.

3. Ackerman D.A., Barry J.M., Wicklund R.A. et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with prostate cancer extension to the surgical margin and pelvic node metastasis at radical prostatectomy // J. Urol. — 1993. — V. 150, № 6. — P. 1845–1850.

4. Ohori M., Wheeler T.M., Kattan M.W. et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens // J. Urol. — 1995. — V. 154, № 5. — P. 1818–1824.

5. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B. et al. An analysis of the time course of postoperative prostate-specific antigen failure in patients with positive surgical margins: implications on the use of adjuvant therapy // Urology. — 1996. — V. 47, № 4 — P. 538–547.

6. Rosen M.A., Goldstone L., Lapin S. et al. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens // J. Urol. — 1992. — V. 148, № 2, Pt. 1. — P. 331–337.

7. Watson R.B, Civantos F., Soloway M.S. Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy: detailed pathological analysis and prognosis // Urology. — 1996. — V. 48, № 1. — P. 80–90.

8. Tigrani V.S., Bhargava V., Shinohara K., Presti J.C.Jr. Number of positive systematic sextant biopsies predicts surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy // Urology. — 1999. — V. 54, № 4. — P. 689–693.

9. Gao X., Mohideen N., Flanigan R.C. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection // J. Urol. — 2000. — V. 164, № 6. — P. 1982–1986.

10. Horsch R., Jung H., G?tz T. et al. Radical perineal prostatectomy – a single institution study on prospectively controlled results in a consecutive series of 1220 cases // Eur. Urol. — 2005. — V. 4, № 3. — P. 102.

11. Patel V. Histopathologic outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy 400 cases // Eur. Urol. — 2005. — V. 4, № 3. — P. 10.

12. Grossfeld G.D., Chang J.J., Broering J.M. et al. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CAPSURE database // J. Urol. — 2000. — V. 163, № 4. — P. 1171–1177.

13. Pettus J.A., Weight C.J., Thompson C.J. et al. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location // J. Urol. — 2004. — V. 171, № 1. — P. 129–132.

14. Epstein J.I., Carmichael M.J., Pizov G., Walsh, P.C. Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term followup // J. Urol. — 1993. — V. 150, № 1. — P. 135–141.

15. Stamey T.A., Villers A.A., McNeal J.E. et al. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection // J. Urol. — 1990. — V. 143, № 6. — P. 1166–1172.

16. Voges G.E., McNeal J.E., Redwine E.A. et al. Morphologic analysis of surgical margins with positive findings in prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate // Cancer. — 1992. — V. 69, № 2. — P. 520–526.

17. Weldon V.E., Tavel F.R., Neuwirth H. et al. Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy // J. Urol. — 1995. — V. 153, № 5. — P. 1565–1569.

18. Stephenson R.A., Middleton R.G., Abbott T.M.: Wide excision (nonnerve sparing) radical retropubic prostatectomy using an initial perirectal dissection // J. Urol. — 1997. — V. 157, № 1. — P. 251–255.

19. Shuford M.D., Cookson M.S., Chang S.S. et al. Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy // J. Urol. — 2004. — V. 172, № 1. — P. 119–123.

20. Iselin C.E., Robertson J.E., Paulson D.F. Radical perineal prostatectomy: oncological outcome during a 20-year period // J. Urol. — 1999. — V. 161, № 1. — P. 163–168.

21. Barocas D.A., Han M., Epstein J.I. et al. Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer? // Urology. — 2001. — V. 58, № 5. — P. 746–751.

22. Swindle P., Eastham J.A., Ohori M. et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens // J. Urol. — 2005. — V. 174, № 3. — P. 903–907.

23. Vallet B.B. Radical perineal prostatectomy subsequent to bilateral orchiectomy // Del. Med. J. — 1944. — V. 6. — P. 19.

24. Polito M., Muzzonigro G., Minardi D. et al. Effects of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy on prostatic cancer // Eur. Urol. — 1996. — V. 30, Suppl. 1. — P. 26–31.

25. Soloway M.S. Role of induction androgen deprivation before radical prostatectomy // Semin. Urol. — 1995. — V. 13, № 2. — P. 142–147.

26. Civantos F., Soloway M.S., Pinto J.E. Histopathological effects of androgen deprivation in prostatic cancer // Semin. Urol. Oncol. — 1996. — V. 14, № 2, Suppl. 2. — P. 22–31.

27. Witjes, W. P., Schulman, C. C., Debruyne, F. M. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study comparing radical prostatectomy versus radical prosta tectomy associated with neoadjuvant hormonal combination therapy in T2-3 N0 M0 prostatic carcinoma // Urology. — 1997. — V. 49, № 3A, Suppl. — P. 65–69.


Для цитирования:


Петров С.Б., Ракул С.А. Положительный хирургический край при радикальной позадилонной простатэктомии: частота, прогностические факторы, медикаментозная профилактика. Онкоурология. 2006;2(1):40-44. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2006-2-1-40-44

For citation:


Petrov S.B., Rakul S.A. Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Incidence and Prognostic Factors. Cancer Urology. 2006;2(1):40-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2006-2-1-40-44

Просмотров: 21


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1726-9776 (Print)
ISSN 1996-1812 (Online)
X