Диагностические возможности эндоректальной магнитно-резонансной томографии в стадировании рака предстательной железы

1. O'Dowd G.J., Veltri R.W., Orozco R. et al. Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. J Urol 1997;158(3 Pt 1):687—98.

2. Partin A.W., Yoo J., Carter H.B. et al. The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1993;150:110—4.

3. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Schnall M. et al. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer.Cancer 1995;75:2368—72.

4. Song C., Kang T., Ro J.Y. et al. Nomograms for the prediction of pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men. J Korean Med Sci 2005;20(2):262—6.

5. Carver B.S., Bianco F.J. Jr., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy in men with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. J Urol 2006;176(2):564—8.

6. Leewansangtong S., Soontrapa S., Nualyong C. et al. Is radical prostatectomy in thai men a high morbidity surgery for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer? J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88(12):1833—7.

7. Rifkin M.D., Zerhouni E.A., Gatsonis C.A. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer: results of multiinstitutional cooperative trial. N Engl J Med 1990;323(4):621—6.

8. Torricelli P., Cinquantini F., Ligabue G. et al. Comparative evaluation between external phased array coil at 3 T and endorectal coil at 1.5 T: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30(3):355—61.

9. Sala E., Akin O., Moskowitz C.S. et al. Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology 2006;238(3):929—37.

10. Brassell S.A., Krueger W.R., Choi J.H., Taylor J.A. 3rd. Correlation of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with pathologic stage. World J Urol 2004;22(4):289—92.

11. Jager G.J., Ruijter E.T., van de Kaa C.A. et al. Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(4):845—52.

12. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Schnall M. et al. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer. Cancer 1995;75(9):2368—72.

13. Sala E., Eberhardt S.C., Akin O. et al. Endorectal MR imaging before salvage prostatectomy: tumor localization and staging. Radiology 2006;238(1):176—83.

14. Mullerad M., Hricak H., Wang L. et al. Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232(1):140—6.

15. Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education, and Research. 2005. Available from: www.imrser.org; www.mrisafety.com

16. Siegel C. Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging. J Urol 2005;174(2):569.

17. Chen M., Hricak H., Kalbhen C.L. et al. Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(5):1157—63.

18. Mueller-Lisse U.G., Vigneron D.B., Hricak H. et al. Localized prostate cancer: effect of hormone deprivation therapy measured by using combined three-dimensional 1H MR spectroscopy and MR imaging: clinicopathologic case-controlled study. Radiology 2001;221(2): 380—90.

19. Outwater E.K., Petersen R.O., Siegelman E.S. et al. Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 1994;193(2):333—9.

20. Jager G.J., Severens J.L., Thornbury J.R. et al. Prostate cancer staging: should MR imaging be used? A decision analytic approach. Radiology 2000;215(2): 445—51.