Особенности визуализации атипичных почечных ангиомиолипом при компьютерной томографии и ультразвуковом исследовании

1. Руководство по клинической урологии. Пер. с англ. Под ред. Ф.М. Ханко, С.Б. Манивича, А. Дж. Вейна. 3-е изд. М., ООО «Медицинское информационное агентство»; 2006. с. 306.

2. Самсонов В.А. Патоморфология опухолей почек и верхних мочевыводящих путей. М., Медицина; 1981.

3. Attyaoui F., Binous M.Y., Sallami S. et al. Renal angiomyolipoma. Tunis Med 2003;81(1):1–4.

4. Воронин Д.В. Лучевая диагностика ангиомиолипомы почки: Дис. … канд. мед. наук. М.; 1999. 110 с.

5. Справочник по онкологии. Под ред. акад. РАМН Н.Н. Трапезникова и проф. И.В. Поддубной. Онкоцентр РАМН. Справочная библиотека врача. Вып. 4. М., КАППА; 1996.

6. Bulto Monteverde J.A., Talens A., Navalon P. et al. Renal angiomyolipoma. Ultrasonography and computerized tomography findings. Arch Esp Urol 1999;52(10):1043–50.

7. Zebedin D., Kammerhuber F., Uggowitzer M.M. et al. Criteria for ultrasound differentiation of small angiomyolipomas (< or = 3 cm) and renal cell carcinomas. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1998;69(6):627–32.

8. Ascenti G., Zimbaro G., Mazziotti S. et al. Usefulness of power Doppler and contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of hyperechoic renal masses. Abdom Imaging. 2001;26(6):654–60.

9. Ikeda A.K., Korobkin M., Platt J.F. et al. Small echogenic renal masses: how often is computed tomography used to confirm the sonographic suspicion of angiomyolipoma? Urology 1995;46(3):311–5.

10. Nakai M., Nakamura N. A case report of spontaneous rupture of renal cell carcinoma difficult to be distinguished from angiomyolipoma. Hinyokika Kiyo 2003;49(2):99–101.

11. Esparza P.P., Sarasua M.A., de Andoin Barandiaran G.N. et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: a case with a difficult diagnosis. An Esp Pediatr 2002;57(5):495–7.

12. Matveev V.B., Volkova M.I., Kudashev B.V. et al. Diagnostic difficulties in rare variants of renal angiomyolipoma. Urologiia 2000;(4):22–6.

13. Obuz F., Karabay N., Secil M. et al. Various radiological appearances of angiomyolipomas in the same kidney. Eur Radiol 2000;10(6):897–9.

14. Pozzi Mucelli R., Locatelli M. Renal angiomyolipoma: typical and atypical features. Radiol Med 2002;103(5-6):474–87.

15. Pozzi-Mucelli F., Pozzi-Mucelli R.S., Melato M. et al. Renal angiomyolipomas: atypical aspects in ultrasonography and computerized tomography. Radiol Med 1993;86(6):856–64.

16. Bennett W.F., Bova J.G., Vaswani K. Case 2. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(3):881;883–4.

17. Hosokawa Y., Kinouchi T., Sawai Y. et al. Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat. Int J Clin Oncol 2002;7(2):120–3.

18. Jinzaki M., Tanimoto A., Narimatsu Y. et al. Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Radiology 1997;205(2):497–502.

19. Ohkawa M., Kadoya M., Nonomura A. Renal angiomyolipoma composed primarily of smooth muscle element: diagnostic considerations. Urol Int 1995;54(4):230–3.

20. Bernardini S., Chabannes E., Algros M.P. et al. Variants of renal angiomyolipoma closely simulating renal cell carcinoma: difficulties in the histological diagnosis. Urol Int 2002;69(1):78–81.

21. Jimenez R.E., Eble J.N., Reuter V.E. et al. Concurrent angiomyolipoma and renal cell neoplasia: a study of 36 cases. Mod Pathol 2001;14(3):157-63.

22. Tsujimura A., Miki T., Gotoh T. et al. Renal cell carcinoma with a fatty component mimicking angiomyolipoma on CT. Br J Radiol 1998;71(849):977-9.

23. Cibas E.S., Goss G.A., Kulke M.H. et al. Malignant epithelioid angiomyolipoma ('sarcoma ex angiomyolipoma') of the kidney: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25(1):121–6.