Повторная трансректальная биопсия предстательной железы у пациентов с простатической интраэпителиальной неоплазией высокой степени: сроки и особенности проведения

1. Ayala A.G., Naya Y., Tamboli P. et al. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and invasive adenocarcinoma: case repot and pre-liminary study of 103 patients with high-grade PIN. Pathol Case Rev 2003;8:61—7.

2. Bishara T., Rammani D.M., Epstein J.I. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:629—33.

3. Bostwick D.G. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol 2004;17:360—79.

4. Bostwick D.G. Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN). Urology 1989;34:16—22.

5. McNeal J.E., Bostwick D.G. Intraductal dysplasia: A premalignant lesion of the prostate. Hum Pathol 1986;17:64—71.

6. Epstein J.I., Grignon D.J., Humphrey P. et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:873—6.

7. Orozco R., O'Dowd G.J., Kunnel B. et al. Observations on pathology trends in 62,537 prostate biopsies obtained from urology private practices in the United States. Urology 1998;51:186—95.

8. Steiner M.S. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer risk reduction. World J Urol 2003;21:15—20.

9. Davidson D., Bostwick D.G., Qian J. et al. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma: predictive accuracy in needle biopsies. J Urol 1995;154:1295—9.

10. Girasole C.R., Cookson M.S., Putzi M.J. et al. Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy. J Urol 2006;175(3):929—33.

11. Joniau S., Goeman L., Pennings J., Van Poppel H. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): importance and clinical management. Eur Urol 2005;48(3):379—85.

12. O`Dowd G.J., Miller G., Orozco R., Veltri R.W. Analysis of repeated biopsy result within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis. Urology 2000;55(4):553—9.

13. Epstein J.I., Herawi M. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol 2006;175(3):820—34.

14. Herawi M., Kahane H., Cavallo C., Epstein J.I. Risk of prostate cancer on first re-biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is related to the number of cores sampled. J Urol 2006;175(1):121—4.

15. Moore C.K., Karikehallis S., Nazeer T. et al. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. J Urol 2005;173(1):70—2.

16. Lefkowitz G.K., Taneja S.S., Brown J. et al. Followup interval prostate biopsy 3 years after diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with high likelihood of prostate cancer, independent of change in prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol 2002;168(4):1415—8.

17. Ковылина М.В. Клиникоморфологическая характеристика предраковых заболеваний и рака предстательной железы. Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М.; 2006.

18. McNeal J.E., Villers A., Redwine E.A. et al. Microcarcinoma of the prostate: its association with duct-acinar dysplasia. Hum Pathol 1991;22:644.

19. Srodom M., Epstein J.I. Central zone histology of the prostate: a mimicker of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum Pathol 2002;33:518—23.