<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Cancer Urology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Cancer Urology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онкоурология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1726-9776</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1996-1812</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">624</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1726-9776-2017-13-2-174-188</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. PROSTATE CANCER</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ДИАГНОСТИКА И ЛЕЧЕНИЕ ОПУХОЛЕЙ МОЧЕПОЛОВОЙ СИСТЕМЫ. Рак предстательной железы</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Salvage lymphadenectomy in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy A.O. Vasil’ev, A.V. Govorov, D.Yu. Pushkar’</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Сальважная лимфаденэктомия у пациентов с рецидивом рака предстательной жедезы после радикальной простатэктомии</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vasil’ev</surname><given-names>A. O.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Васильев</surname><given-names>А. О.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Urology Department </p><p><italic>Build. 1, 20 Delegatskaya St., Moscow 127473</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Васильев Александр Олегович - ассистент кафедры урологии </p><p><italic>127473 Москва, ул. Делегатская, 20</italic></p></bio><email>doctormma@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Govorov</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Говоров</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Urology Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Говоров Александр Викторович</p><p><italic>Кафедра урологии</italic></p></bio><email>alexgovorov@newmail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pushkar’</surname><given-names>D. Yu.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пушкарь</surname><given-names>Д. Ю.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Urology Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Пушкарь Дмитрий Юрьевич</p><p><italic>Кафедра урологии</italic></p></bio><email>doctormma@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет им. А.И. Евдокимова» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2017-06-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-10-29"><day>29</day><month>10</month><year>2016</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2017-01-11"><day>11</day><month>01</month><year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/624">https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/624</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>A separate group of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, make patients with isolated recurrence of cancer in the lymph nodes, limited by regional and / or retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Alternatively, treatment of this patient group can be used open or laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (robot-assisted). The analysis of literature indicate an increase in disease-free survival of these patients during lymphadenectomy. Imaging techniques such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, allow more accurately identify lymph nodes in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Отдельную группу больных, перенесших радикальную простатэктомию, составляют пациенты с изолированным рецидивом рака в лимфатических узлах, ограниченных регионарными и / или забрюшинными лимфатическими узлами. В качестве одного из вариантов лечения данной группы пациентов может быть применена лимфаденэктомия открытым или лапароскопическим (робот-ассистированным) доступами. Проведенный анализ литературных источников указывает на увеличение общей выживаемости данной группы пациентов при проведении лимфаденэктомии. Доступные методы визуализации, такие как мультипараметрическая магнитно-резонансная томография и позитронно-эмиссионная томография, позволяют более точно идентифицировать поражение лимфатических узлов у пациентов с биохимическим рецидивом рака простаты после радикальной простатэктомии. </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>prostate cancer</kwd><kwd>recurrence</kwd><kwd>lymph node dissection</kwd><kwd>multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging</kwd><kwd>positron emission tomography</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак предстательной железы</kwd><kwd>рецидив</kwd><kwd>лимфаденэктомия</kwd><kwd>мультипараметрическая магнитно-резонансная томография</kwd><kwd>позитронно-эмиссионная томография</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Президент Российской Федерации (грант МД-5594.2016.7 )</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Abdollah F., Briganti A., Montorsi F. et al. Contemporary role of salvage lymphadenectomy in patients with recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2015;67(5):839–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.019. PMID: 24698524.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abdollah F., Briganti A., Montorsi F. et al. Contemporary role of salvage lymphadenectomy in patients with recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2015;67(5):839–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.019. PMID: 24698524.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Briers E. et al. Netherlands: European Association of Urology, 2017. 146 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Briers E. et al. Netherlands: European Association of Urology, 2017. 146 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Giovacchini G., Picchio M., GraciaParra R. et al. 11C-choline PET/CT predicts prostate cancer-specific survival in patients with biochemical failure during androgen deprivation therapy. J Nucl Med 2014;55(2): 233–41. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123380. PMID: 24408897.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giovacchini G., Picchio M., GraciaParra R. et al. 11C-choline PET/CT predicts prostate cancer-specific survival in patients with biochemical failure during androgen deprivation therapy. J Nucl Med 2014;55(2): 233–41. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123380. PMID: 24408897.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Suardi N., Porter C.R., Reuther A.M. et al. A nomogram predicting long-term biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2008;112(6):1254–63. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23293. PMID: 18286530.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Suardi N., Porter C.R., Reuther A.M. et al. A nomogram predicting long-term biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2008;112(6):1254–63. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23293. PMID: 18286530.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. de Jong I.J., Pruim P., Elsinga W. et al. C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003;44(1):32–9. PMID: 12814672.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">de Jong I.J., Pruim P., Elsinga W. et al. C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003;44(1):32–9. PMID: 12814672.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Giovacchini G., Picchio M., Briganti A. et al. 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to restage prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and no disease evidence on conventional imaging. J Urol 2010;184(3):938–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.084. PMID: 20643445.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giovacchini G., Picchio M., Briganti A. et al. 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to restage prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and no disease evidence on conventional imaging. J Urol 2010;184(3):938–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.084. PMID: 20643445.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Krause B.J., Souvatzoglou M., Tuncel M. et al. The detection rate of 11C-cholinePET/CT depends on the serum PSAvalue in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35(1):18–23. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0581-4. PMID: 17891394.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krause B.J., Souvatzoglou M., Tuncel M. et al. The detection rate of 11C-cholinePET/CT depends on the serum PSAvalue in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35(1):18–23. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0581-4. PMID: 17891394.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Heesakkers R.A., Hovels A.M., Jager G.J. et al. MRI with a lymph-node-specific contrast agent as an alternative to CT scan and lymph-node dissection in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective multicohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008;9(9):850–6. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70203-1. PMID: 18708295.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Heesakkers R.A., Hovels A.M., Jager G.J. et al. MRI with a lymph-node-specific contrast agent as an alternative to CT scan and lymph-node dissection in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective multicohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008;9(9):850–6. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70203-1. PMID: 18708295.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Lecouvet F.E., El Mouedden J., Collette L. et al. Can whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusionweighted imaging replace Tc 99m bone scanning and computed tomography for single-step detection of metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer? Eur Urol 2012;62(1):68–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.020. PMID: 22366187.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lecouvet F.E., El Mouedden J., Collette L. et al. Can whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusionweighted imaging replace Tc 99m bone scanning and computed tomography for single-step detection of metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer? Eur Urol 2012;62(1):68–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.020. PMID: 22366187.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Harisinghani M.G., Barentsz J., Hahn P.F. et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. New Engl J Med 2003;348(25):2491–9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022749. PMID: 12815134.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harisinghani M.G., Barentsz J., Hahn P.F. et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. New Engl J Med 2003;348(25):2491–9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022749. PMID: 12815134.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Wang L., Hricak H., Kattan M.W. Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(3):743–8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1682. PMID: 16498101.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang L., Hricak H., Kattan M.W. Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(3):743–8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1682. PMID: 16498101.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. Schilling D., Schlemmer H.P., Wagner P.H. et al. Histological verification of 11Ccholine-positron emission/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in patients with biochemical failure after treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008;102(4):446–51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07592.x. PMID: 18410442.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schilling D., Schlemmer H.P., Wagner P.H. et al. Histological verification of 11Ccholine-positron emission/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in patients with biochemical failure after treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008;102(4):446–51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07592.x. PMID: 18410442.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Winter A., Uphoff J., Henke R.P., Wawroschek F. First results of 11Ccholine PET/CT-guided secondary lymph node surgery in patients with PSA failure and single lymph node recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Int 2010;84(4):418–23. PMID: 20299773. DOI: 10.1159/000296298.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Winter A., Uphoff J., Henke R.P., Wawroschek F. First results of 11Ccholine PET/CT-guided secondary lymph node surgery in patients with PSA failure and single lymph node recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Int 2010;84(4):418–23. PMID: 20299773. DOI: 10.1159/000296298.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Rinnab L., Mottaghy F.M., Simon J. 11C-Choline PET/CT for targeted salvage lymph node dissection in patients with biochemical recurrence after primary curative therapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results of a prospective study. Urol Int 2008;81(2): 191–7. DOI: 10.1159/000144059. PMID: 18758218.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rinnab L., Mottaghy F.M., Simon J. 11C-Choline PET/CT for targeted salvage lymph node dissection in patients with biochemical recurrence after primary curative therapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results of a prospective study. Urol Int 2008;81(2): 191–7. DOI: 10.1159/000144059. PMID: 18758218.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Castellucci P., Fuccio C., Rubello D. et al. Is there a role for 11C-choline PET/ CT in the early detection of metastatic disease in surgically treated prostate cancer patients with a mild PSA increase &lt; 1.5 ng/ml? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38(1):55–63. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1604-0. PMID: 20848281.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Castellucci P., Fuccio C., Rubello D. et al. Is there a role for 11C-choline PET/ CT in the early detection of metastatic disease in surgically treated prostate cancer patients with a mild PSA increase &lt; 1.5 ng/ml? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38(1):55–63. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1604-0. PMID: 20848281.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Mamede M., Ceci F., Castellucci P. et al. The role of 11C-choline PET imaging in the early detection of recurrence in surgically treated prostate cancer patients with very low PSA level &lt; 0.5 ng/ mL. Clin Nucl Med 2013;38(9):e342–5. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31829af913. PMID: 23797218.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mamede M., Ceci F., Castellucci P. et al. The role of 11C-choline PET imaging in the early detection of recurrence in surgically treated prostate cancer patients with very low PSA level &lt; 0.5 ng/ mL. Clin Nucl Med 2013;38(9):e342–5. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31829af913. PMID: 23797218.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17. Tilki D., Reich O., Graser A. et al. 18FFluoroethylcholine PET/CT identifies lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy but underestimates its extent. Eur Urol 2013;63(5):792–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.003. PMID: 22902037.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tilki D., Reich O., Graser A. et al. 18FFluoroethylcholine PET/CT identifies lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy but underestimates its extent. Eur Urol 2013;63(5):792–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.003. PMID: 22902037.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18. Rigatti P., Suardi N., Briganti A. et al. Pelvic/retroperitoneal salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence detected by 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Urol 2011;60:935–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.060.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rigatti P., Suardi N., Briganti A. et al. Pelvic/retroperitoneal salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence detected by 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Urol 2011;60:935–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.060.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19. Jilg C.A., Rischke H.C., Reske S.N. et al. Salvage lymph node dissection with adjuvant radiotherapy for nodal recurrence of prostate cancer. J Urol 2012;188(6):2190–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.041. PMID: 23083862.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jilg C.A., Rischke H.C., Reske S.N. et al. Salvage lymph node dissection with adjuvant radiotherapy for nodal recurrence of prostate cancer. J Urol 2012;188(6):2190–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.041. PMID: 23083862.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20. Suardi N., Karnes J., Joniau S. et al. Salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and imaging-detected nodal metastases. J Urol 2013;189:317–8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Suardi N., Karnes J., Joniau S. et al. Salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and imaging-detected nodal metastases. J Urol 2013;189:317–8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21. Suardi N., Gandaglia G., Gallina A. et al. Long-term outcomes of salvage lymph node dissection for clinically recurrent prostate cancer: results of a single-institution series with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Eur Urol 2015;67(2):299–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.011. PMID: 24571959.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Suardi N., Gandaglia G., Gallina A. et al. Long-term outcomes of salvage lymph node dissection for clinically recurrent prostate cancer: results of a single-institution series with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Eur Urol 2015;67(2):299–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.011. PMID: 24571959.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">22. Coelho R.F., Palmer K.J., Moniz R.R. et al. Early complication rates in a singlesurgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 2010;57(6):945–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.001. PMID: 20181424.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coelho R.F., Palmer K.J., Moniz R.R. et al. Early complication rates in a singlesurgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 2010;57(6):945–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.001. PMID: 20181424.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
