Cancer UrologyCancer UrologyОнкоурология1726-97761996-1812Publishing House ABV Press5610.17650/1726-9776-2014-10-2-38-45PROSTATE CANCERРАК ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫSURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER AT HIGH RISK OF PROGRESSIONХИРУРГИЧЕСКОЕ ЛЕЧЕНИЕ БОЛЬНЫХ РАКОМ ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ С ВЫСОКИМ РИСКОМ ПРОГРЕССИРОВАНИЯNyushkoK. M.НюшкоК. М.
Russian Federation
kirandja@yandex.ruAlekseevB. Ya.АлексеевБ. Я.
Russian Federation
kirandja@yandex.ruKrasheninnikovA. A.КрашенинниковА. А.
Russian Federation
kirandja@yandex.ruKaprinA. D.КапринА. Д.
Russian Federation
kirandja@yandex.ruP.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research InstituteМНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена3006201410238452507201425072014https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/56

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most burning problems of modern urologic oncology. Patients at its high risk are characterized by a more aggressive course of the disease and significantly lower tumor-specific and relapse-free survival rates. Hormone therapy and radiotherapy are one of the conventional treatments in patients with PC at high risk of progression. Nonetheless, more and more publications demonstrating the efficiency and safety of surgical therapy in this contingent of patients are recently appearing. This paper presents the results of surgical treat-ment in 499 patients with PC at high risk of progression, who have undergone radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Department of Urologic Oncology, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute.

 

Рак предстательной железы (РПЖ) является актуальной проблемой современной онкоурологии. Больные подгруппы высокого риска характеризуются более агрессивным течением заболевания и достоверно меньшими показателями опухолевоспецифической и безрецидивной выживаемости. Одним из общепринятых методов терапии больных РПЖ с высоким риском прогрессирования является гормонолучевое лечение. Тем не менее в последнее время появляется все больше работ, демонстрирующих эффективность и безопасность хирургического метода терапии данного контингента больных. В статье представлены результаты хирургиче-ского лечения 499 больных РПЖ с высоким риском прогрессирования, которым выполнена радикальная простатэктомия с расши-ренной тазовой лимфаденэктомией в отделении онкоурологии МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена.

 

high-risk prostate cancerlymph node metastasessurgical treatmentradical prostatectomypelvic lymphadenectomyрак предстательной железы высокого рискаметастазы в лимфатических узлаххирургическое лечениерадикальная простатэктомиятазовая лимфаденэктомия1. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2011 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. В.И. Чиссова, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М., 2013.Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2011 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. В.И. Чиссова, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М., 2013.2. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B. et al. Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17(1):168–72.D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B. et al. Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17(1):168–72.3. Heidenreich A., Bastian P.J., Bellmunt J. et al. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. 2012.Heidenreich A., Bastian P.J., Bellmunt J. et al. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. 2012.4. Shao Y.H., Demissie K., Shih W. et al. Contemporary risk profile of prostate cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101(18):1280–3.Shao Y.H., Demissie K., Shih W. et al. Contemporary risk profile of prostate cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101(18):1280–3.5. Yossepowitch O., Eggener S.E., Bianco F.J. Jr et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods. J Urol 2007;178(2):493–9.Yossepowitch O., Eggener S.E., Bianco F.J. Jr et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods. J Urol 2007;178(2):493–9.6. Messing E.M., Manola J., Yao J. et al. Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol 2006;7(6):472–9.Messing E.M., Manola J., Yao J. et al. Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol 2006;7(6):472–9.7. Bolla M., Collette L., Blank L. et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360(9327):103–8.Bolla M., Collette L., Blank L. et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360(9327):103–8.8. Pilepich M.V., Winter K., Lawton C.A. et al. Androgen suppression adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in prostate carcinoma – long-term results of phase III RTOG 85-31. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61(5):1285–90.Pilepich M.V., Winter K., Lawton C.A. et al. Androgen suppression adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in prostate carcinoma – long-term results of phase III RTOG 85-31. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61(5):1285–90.9. Tran E., Paquette M., Pickles T. et al. Population-based validation of a policy change to use long-term androgen-deprivation therapy for T3-4 prostate cancer: Impact of the EORTC22863 and RTOG 85-31 and 92-02 trials. Radiother Oncol 2013;107(3):366–77.Tran E., Paquette M., Pickles T. et al. Population-based validation of a policy change to use long-term androgen-deprivation therapy for T3-4 prostate cancer: Impact of the EORTC22863 and RTOG 85-31 and 92-02 trials. Radiother Oncol 2013;107(3):366–77.10. Warde P., Mason M., Ding K. et al. Combined androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy for locally-advanced prostate cancer: a randomized, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011;378(9809):2104–11.Warde P., Mason M., Ding K. et al. Combined androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy for locally-advanced prostate cancer: a randomized, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011;378(9809):2104–11.11. Fallon B., Williams R.D. Current options in the management of clinical stage C prostatic carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 1990;17(4):853–66.Fallon B., Williams R.D. Current options in the management of clinical stage C prostatic carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 1990;17(4):853–66.12. Boccon-Gibod L., Bertaccini A., Bono A.V. et al. Management of locally advanced prostate cancer: a European Consensus. Int J Clin Pract 2003;57(3):187–94.Boccon-Gibod L., Bertaccini A., Bono A.V. et al. Management of locally advanced prostate cancer: a European Consensus. Int J Clin Pract 2003;57(3):187–94.13. Yamada A.H., Lieskovsky G., Petrovich Z. et al. Results of radical prostatectomy and adjuvant therapy in the management of locally advanced, clinical stage TC, prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 1994;17(4):277–85.Yamada A.H., Lieskovsky G., Petrovich Z. et al. Results of radical prostatectomy and adjuvant therapy in the management of locally advanced, clinical stage TC, prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 1994;17(4):277–85.14. Gerber G.S., Thisted R.A., Chodak G.W. et al. Results of radical prostatectomy in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: multi-institutional pooled analysis. Eur Urol 1997;32(4):385–90.Gerber G.S., Thisted R.A., Chodak G.W. et al. Results of radical prostatectomy in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: multi-institutional pooled analysis. Eur Urol 1997;32(4):385–90.15. van den Ouden D., Hop W.C., Schrцder F.H. Progression in and survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (T3) treated with radical prostatectomy as monotherapy. J Urol 1998;160(4):1392–7.van den Ouden D., Hop W.C., Schrцder F.H. Progression in and survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (T3) treated with radical prostatectomy as monotherapy. J Urol 1998;160(4):1392–7.16. Ward J.F., Slezak J.M., Blute M.L. et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome. BJU Int 2005;95(6):751–6.Ward J.F., Slezak J.M., Blute M.L. et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome. BJU Int 2005;95(6):751–6.17. Ghavamian R., Williams S.K., Hakami A.A. High-risk prostate cancer: the role of radical prostatectomy for local therapy. Future Oncol 2011;7(4)543–50.Ghavamian R., Williams S.K., Hakami A.A. High-risk prostate cancer: the role of radical prostatectomy for local therapy. Future Oncol 2011;7(4)543–50.18. Walsh P.C. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: detailed description of the surgical technique. J Urol 2005;173(1):324.Walsh P.C. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: detailed description of the surgical technique. J Urol 2005;173(1):324.19. Hsu C.Y., Joniau S., Oyen R. et al. Outcome of surgery for clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer: a single-institution experience. Eur Urol 2007;51(1):121–8.Hsu C.Y., Joniau S., Oyen R. et al. Outcome of surgery for clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer: a single-institution experience. Eur Urol 2007;51(1):121–8.20. Weingдrtner K., Ramaswamy A., Bittinger A. et al. Anatomical basis for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer: results of an autopsy study and implications for the clinic. J Urol 1996;156(6):1969–71.Weingдrtner K., Ramaswamy A., Bittinger A. et al. Anatomical basis for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer: results of an autopsy study and implications for the clinic. J Urol 1996;156(6):1969–71.21. Schumacher M.C., Burkhard F.C., Thalmann G.N. et al. Good outcome for patients with few lymph node metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008;54:344–52.Schumacher M.C., Burkhard F.C., Thalmann G.N. et al. Good outcome for patients with few lymph node metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008;54:344–52.22. Bader P., Burkhard F.C., Markwalder R. et al. Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? J Urol 2003;169:849–54.Bader P., Burkhard F.C., Markwalder R. et al. Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? J Urol 2003;169:849–54.23. Briganti A., Capitanio U., Chun F.K.-H. et al. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008;54:794–804.Briganti A., Capitanio U., Chun F.K.-H. et al. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008;54:794–804.24. Daneshmand S., Quek M.L., Stein J.P. et al. Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long-term results. J Urol 2004;172:2252–5.Daneshmand S., Quek M.L., Stein J.P. et al. Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long-term results. J Urol 2004;172:2252–5.25. Engel J., Bastian P.J., Baur H. et al. Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in lymph node-positive patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2010;754–61.Engel J., Bastian P.J., Baur H. et al. Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in lymph node-positive patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2010;754–61.