<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Cancer Urology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Cancer Urology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онкоурология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1726-9776</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1996-1812</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">377</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1726-9776-2014-10-3-43-48</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. RENAL CANCER</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ДИАГНОСТИКА И ЛЕЧЕНИЕ ОПУХОЛЕЙ МОЧЕПОЛОВОЙ СИСТЕМЫ. Рак почки</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Metastatic kidney cancer: Choice of first-line therapy</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Метастатический рак почки: выбор терапии первой линии</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alekseev</surname><given-names>B. Ya.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алексеев</surname><given-names>Б. Я.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>byalekseev@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена, кафедра урологии с курсом онкоурологии ФПКМР РУДН, кафедра онкологии МИУВ МГУПП</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff id="aff2"><institution>Department of Urology with Course of Urologic Oncology, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow</institution></aff><aff id="aff3"><institution>Department of Oncology, Medical Institute for Postgraduate Training of Physicians, Moscow State University of Food Productions</institution></aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014-09-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2014-11-07"><day>07</day><month>11</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2014-11-07"><day>07</day><month>11</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/377">https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/377</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The current practice in prescribing targeted agents for patients with metastatic kidney cancer (KC) is based on the results of a few large-scale multicenter randomized trials of the efficacy of different drugs in different clinical situations. Most international and national oncology and urology associations recommend 3 standard treatment options: 1) bevaсizumab in combination with interferon; 2) sunitinib; 3) pazopanib as first-line therapy in patients with good and intermediate risk metastatic KC. The valid choice of a drug for first-line therapy is one of the topical problems of real clinical practice. The criteria for choosing a drug are primarily its efficacy and toxicity profile. In addition, the specific features of a patient’s health status, the presence of different intercurrent diseases, lifestyle, and professional peculiarities also affect the choice of a treatment regimen. The paper comparatively reviews the efficacy and toxicity of bevaсizumab in combination with interferon at different doses, those of sunitinib and pazopanib, on the basis of which the choice of a drug for the therapy of patients with good and intermediate risk metastatic KC may be planned in a specific clinical situation.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Современная практика назначения таргетных агентов у пациентов с метастатическим раком почки (РП) основана на результатах нескольких крупных многоцентровых рандомизированных исследований, в которых изучалась эффективность различных препаратов в различных клинических ситуациях. Большинство международных и национальных онкологических и урологических ассоциаций рекомендуют в качестве терапии первой линии у больных метастатическим РП с хорошим и промежуточным прогнозом 3 стандартных варианта лечения: бевацизумаб в комбинации с интерфероном, сунитиниб и пазопаниб.Одним из актуальных вопросов реальной клинической практики является обоснованный выбор препарата для проведения терапии первой линии. Критериями выбора препарата являются в первую очередь его эффективность и профиль токсичности. Кроме того, особенности статуса здоровья пациента, наличие различных интеркуррентных заболеваний, образ жизни и профессиональные особенности также влияют на выбор схемы лечения. В статье приводится сравнительный обзор эффективности и токсичности бевацизумаба в комбинации с интерфероном в различных дозах, сунитиниба и пазопаниба, на основании которого можно планировать в конкретной клинической ситуации выбор препарата для терапии больных метастатическим РП с хорошим и промежуточным прогнозом.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>kidney carcinoma</kwd><kwd>targeted therapy</kwd><kwd>relapse-free survival</kwd><kwd>adverse events</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак почки</kwd><kwd>таргетная терапия</kwd><kwd>безрецидивная выживаемость</kwd><kwd>нежелательные явления</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Ljungberg B., Bensalah K., Bex A. et al. EAU Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/10%20 Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma_LR.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ljungberg B., Bensalah K., Bex A. et al. EAU Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/10%20 Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma_LR.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Kidney Cancer, V.2.2012. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed March 5, 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Kidney Cancer, V.2.2012. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed March 5, 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Escudier B., Eisen T., Porta C. et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and followup. Ann Oncol 2012;23(Suppl 7): vii65-vii71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Escudier B., Eisen T., Porta C. et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and followup. Ann Oncol 2012;23(Suppl 7): vii65-vii71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Motzer R.J., Hutson T., Tomczak P. et al. Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(22):3584–90.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Motzer R.J., Hutson T., Tomczak P. et al. Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(22):3584–90.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Escudier B., Pluzanska A., Koralewski P. et al. AVOREN Trial investigators. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet 2007;370:2103–11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Escudier B., Pluzanska A., Koralewski P. et al. AVOREN Trial investigators. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet 2007;370:2103–11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Sternberg C.N., Davis I.D., Mardiak J. et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(6):1061–8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sternberg C.N., Davis I.D., Mardiak J. et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(6):1061–8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Motzer R.J., Hutson T.E., Cella D. et al. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2013;369(8):722–31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Motzer R.J., Hutson T.E., Cella D. et al. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2013;369(8):722–31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Negrier S., Gwenaelle G., Peroll D. et al. Temsirolimus and bevacizumab, or sunitinib, or interferon alfa and bevacizumab for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (TORAVA): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:673–80.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Negrier S., Gwenaelle G., Peroll D. et al. Temsirolimus and bevacizumab, or sunitinib, or interferon alfa and bevacizumab for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (TORAVA): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:673–80.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Motzer R.J., Barrios C.H., Kim T.M. et al. Record-3: Phase II randomized trial comparing sequential first-line everolimus (EVE) and second-line sunitinib (SUN) versus first-line SUN and second-line EVE in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). J Clin Oncol 2013;31(suppl);abstr 4504.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Motzer R.J., Barrios C.H., Kim T.M. et al. Record-3: Phase II randomized trial comparing sequential first-line everolimus (EVE) and second-line sunitinib (SUN) versus first-line SUN and second-line EVE in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). J Clin Oncol 2013;31(suppl);abstr 4504.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Melichar B., Bracarda S., Matveev V. et al. A multinational phase II trial of bevacizumab with low-dose interferon-α2a as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: BEVLiN. Ann Oncol 2013;24(9):2396–402.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Melichar B., Bracarda S., Matveev V. et al. A multinational phase II trial of bevacizumab with low-dose interferon-α2a as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: BEVLiN. Ann Oncol 2013;24(9):2396–402.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Patard J.-J., Rioux-Leclercq N., Fergelot P. Understanding the importance of smart drugs in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2006;49:633–43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Patard J.-J., Rioux-Leclercq N., Fergelot P. Understanding the importance of smart drugs in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2006;49:633–43.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. Hurwitz H.I., Saltz L.B., Van Cutsem E. et al. Venous thromboembolic events with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: a pooled analysis of patients in randomized phase II and III studies. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(13):1757–64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hurwitz H.I., Saltz L.B., Van Cutsem E. et al. Venous thromboembolic events with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: a pooled analysis of patients in randomized phase II and III studies. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(13):1757–64.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Melichar B., Koralewski P., Ravaud A. et al. First-line bevacizumab combined with reduced dose interferon-a2a is active in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1470–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Melichar B., Koralewski P., Ravaud A. et al. First-line bevacizumab combined with reduced dose interferon-a2a is active in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1470–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
